Patterns of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian companies: clustering and improvement strategies for responsible activities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.28
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #2, pp. 365-375
- Cited by
- 1252 Views
-
117 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The variability of companies stakeholders’ engagement forms, communication channels, approaches to disclosure of companies’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) and strategies for CSR achievement cause the formation of benchmarks – patterns of responsible behavior of these companies. Determination of companies’ CSR patterns plays is a ground of (plays a role or is a ground of) improving their strategies for responsible activities. These patterns were highlighted on the basis of comprehensive three-component indicator that illustrates the combination of parameters: models of companies’ communication with stakeholders, approaches to the disclosure of information on CSR and strategies for incorporating CSR and Sustainable Development Goals. Positioning of 22 Ukrainian companies for the period 2005–2017 was made. Results of positioning allowed to determine such clusters of the companies in accordance with the pattern of responsible behavior as А – innovators, B – leaders, C – pursuer, D – followers, E – starters, F – outsiders; to develop the measures on the improvement of their CSR activity.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, Q16, O13, L66, M14, M40
-
References27
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. The use of the companies’ channels of communication with stakeholders in accordance with the models, levels and strategies of engagement
- Table 2. Map of measures on the improvement of the strategies of responsible behavior by their patterns in quantitative assessment
- Table A1. The positioning of the Ukrainian companies by the parameters of information disclosure and by three-component indicator in 2005–2017
- Table B1. Qualitative characteristics of companies’ responsible behavior patterns by strategic benchmarks in achieving the SDGs, communication with stakeholders and approaches to information disclosure in the CSR reporting
-
- Accountability. (2015). AA1000SES.
- Amor-Esteban, V., Galindo-Villardón, P., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Cultural values on CSR patterns and evolution: A study from the biplot representation. Ecological Indicators, 81, 18-29.
- Amor-Esteban, V., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Galindo-Villardón, P. (2018). Analyzing the Effect of Legal System on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the Country Level, from a Multivariate Perspective. Social Indicators Research, 140(1), 435-452.
- Bilan, Y., Streimikiene, D., Vasylieva, T., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Pavlyk, A. (2019). Linking between renewable energy, CO 2 emissions, and economic growth: Challenges for candidates and potential candidates for the EU membership. Sustainability, 11(6), 1528.
- Chortok, Y., Yevdokymova, A., & Serpeninova, Y. (2018). Formation of the mechanism of corporate social and environmental responsibility of the trading company. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(5), 1011-1018.
- De Villiers, C., & Marques, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 167-195.
- Deloitte. (2011). IIA: The role of internal audit in non-financial and Integrated Reporting.
- Ernst and Young. (2012) Sustainability reporting: meeting stakeholder demand for relevant, credible and reliable information.
- Ernst and Young. (2016) Road to reliable non-financial reporting.
- Everaert, P., Bouten, L., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2009). Discovering patterns in corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: A transparent framework based on the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (Working Papers). Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University.
- Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta‐analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36(3), 221‐249.
- Galbreath, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 6(2), 175-187.
- Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable?: Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10-22.
- Glennie, M., & Lodhia, S. (2013). The influence of internal organizational factors on corporate-community partnership agendas: An Australian case study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(1), 52-67.
- Global Reporting Initiative (2013). Sustainability Topics for Sectors: What do stakeholders want to know?
- Hancock, Н. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategy.
- Jamali, D., Karam, C., Yin, J., & Soundararajan, V. (2017). CSR logics in developing countries: Translation, adaptation and stalled development. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 343-359.
- Khan, N., Kakabadse, A., & Kakabadse, N. (2015). Spirit of corporate social responsibility transforming from corporatism to socialized capitalism. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(1), 85-95.
- Lawrence, S. R., Botes, V., Collins, E., & Roper, J. (2013). Does accounting construct the identity of firms as purely self-interested or as socially responsible? Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(2), 144-160.
- Lubin, D., & Esty, D. (2010). The Sustainability Imperative. Harvard Business Review.
- Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.
- Skouloudis, A., & Evangelinos, K. (2012). A research design for mapping national CSR terrains. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 19(2), 130-143.
- Sukhonos, V., & Makarenko, I. (2017). Sustainability reporting in the light of corporate social responsibility development: economic and legal issues. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(1-1), 166-174.
- Sukhonos, V., Makarenko, I., Serpeninova, Yu., & Qasimova, G. (2018). Classification and prioritization of stakeholders’ information requests according to Sustainable Development Goals: case of cross-sector partnership in Ukrainian food production industry. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4), 126-140.
- Sulphey, M. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility or Corporate Social Irresponsibility: where should be the focus? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 293-301.
- UNCTAD. (2016). Enhancing the role of reporting in attaining the Sustainable Development Goals: Integration of environmental, social and governance information into company reporting. Geneva: UNCTAD secretariat.
- Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR Initiatives in Business: An Organizing Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 75-92.