Mobile learning for high-school mathematics as a path to better sustainability in a fast-changing society: an exploratory study from Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.30
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #2, pp. 392-403
- Cited by
- 1521 Views
-
248 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The use of mobile learning, or M-learning, has been increasingly appreciated by educators due to its sustainability potential in different facets such as finance (i.e., affordable cost) and flexibility (i.e., time and pace of learning). However, it may not be effective in all situations. This study explored the feasibility of using M-learning for students’ self-study of mathematics in the context of Vietnamese high schools. Using 542 student and 40 teacher responses to two surveys, the study showed that the use of M-learning might not be feasible for students’ self-study of mathematics due to difficulties related to accessing mathematics websites, the quality of mathematics website content, students’ low level of self-learning ability and learning disengagement. This study suggests that the use of M-learning may contribute to the sustainability of education; adopting it should be based on a critical examination of contextual factors, especially students’ self-learning ability and engagement. M-learning can be promising and beneficial to students due to its capability to equip students to prepare for the fast-changing and technological-driven world. Educators have increasingly appreciated the use of M-learning, because it becomes more affordable and flexible. Nonetheless, there is still a question about near-future adoptions of M-learning due to unavailability of and inaccessibility to quality contents from trusted maths websites. The propensity of student engagements in M-learning is also an important issue for future research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I25, O33, O32, O31
-
References46
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. The number of year 12 students in Thai Nguyen province with a mobile
- Table 2. Students’ use of mobile phones
- Table 3. Students’ motivations of self-study of Mathematics
- Table 4. The amount of time that students spent on self-study of Mathematics
- Table 5. Mathematics self-study activities that students often do after class
- Table 6. Perceived form of effective self-study
- Table 7. Teachers’ evaluation of students’ self-study awareness
- Table 8. Teachers’ evaluation of factors influencing students’ self-study of Mathematics
- Table 9. Teachers’ opinions about the use of M-learning for students’ self-study of Mathematics
-
- Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102.
- Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65-71.
- Alzaza, N. S., & Yaakub, A. R. (2011). Students’ awareness and requirements of mobile learning services in the higher education environment. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 95-100.
- Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions: learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567-581.
- Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation: Learning in a mobile age. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96.
- Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51-63.
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
- Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., St. Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 99-113.
- Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Student engagement in higher education: theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91-99.
- Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. Colloquium. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70.
- Ibrahim, N. A., Salisu, M., Popoola, A. A., & Ibrahim, T. I. (2014). Use of smartphones among medical students in the clinical years at a medical school in Sub-Sahara Africa: A pilot study. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 3(2), 28-34.
- Johnson, G. M. (2005). Student alienation, academic achievement, and WebCT use. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 179-189.
- Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2), 90.
- Konold, T., Cornell, D., Jia, Y., & Malone, M. (2018). School climate, student engagement, and academic achievement: A latent variable, multilevel multi-informant examination. AERA Open, 4(4).
- Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first‐year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505.
- Latchem, C. (2018). Mobile Learning. In C. Latchem (Ed.), Open and Distance Non-formal Education in Developing Countries (pp. 29-35).
- Le, A. V., Do, D. L., Pham, D. Q., Hoang, P. H., Duong, T. H., Nguyen, H. N., Vuong, T. T., Nguyen, H. K. T., Ho, M. T., La, V. P., & Vuong, Q. H. (2019). Exploration of youth’s digital competencies: a dataset in the educational context of Vietnam. Data, 4(2), 69.
- Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring Student Relationships to School: Attachment, Bonding, Connectedness, and Engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274-283.
- Macfarlane, B., & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Critiques of student engagement. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 5-21.
- Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.
- Matias, A., & Wolf, D. F. (2013). Engaging students in online courses through the use of mobile technology. In L. A. Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education (Vol. 6) (pp. 115-142).
- Mcconatha, D., Praul, M., & Lynch, M. J. (2008). Mobile learning in higher education: An empirical assessment of a new educational tool. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3).
- Milošević, I., Živković, D., Manasijević, D., & Nikolić, D. (2015). The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 207-215.
- MOET (2018). Direction 2699/CT-BGDĐT: Education’s core tasks of 2017–2018.
- Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581-596.
- Nghia, T. L. H., Phuong, P. T. N., & Huong, T. L. K. (2018). Implementing the student-centred teaching approach in Vietnamese universities: the influence of leadership and management practices on teacher engagement. Educational Studies, 1-17.
- Nguyen, T. Q. T. (2017). Maintaining teachers’ face in the context of change: results from a study of Vietnamese college lecturers’ perceptions of face. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 78-90.
- Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
- Pham, H.-H., Lai, S. L., & Vuong, Q. H. (2019). The role of subjective task value in forming satisfaction and loyalty among Vietnamese international student: A structural equation model. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11.
- Radloff, A., & Coates, A. (2010). Doing More for Learning: Enhancing Engagement and Outcomes: Australasian Survey of Student Engagement: Australasian Student Engagement Report. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
- Sabah, N. M. (2016). Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 522-533.
- Shane R. Jimerson, Emily Campos, & Jennifer L.Greif (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7-27.
- Statista (2019). Vietnam: number of Facebook users 2017-2023.
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
- Thanh, P. T. H. (2010). Implementing a student-centered learning approach at Vietnamese higher education institutions: Barriers under layers of Casual Layered Analysis (CLA). Journal of Futures Studies, 15, 21-38.
- Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423-442.
- Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Jobs for The Future.
- Tran, T. L., Le, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. N. (2014). Curriculum and Pedagogy. In Tran, L., Marginson, S., Do, H., Le, T., Nguyen, N.T., Vu, T., Pham, T. (Eds.). Higher Education in Vietnam: Flexibility, Mobility, and Practicality in the Global Knowledge Economy (pp. 86-107). London: Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
- Valerie M. Crawford (2007). Creating a powerful learning environment with networked mobile learning devices. Educational Technology, 47(3), 47-50.
- Vietnam News (2017, November 29). Smartphone users cover 84% of VN population.
- Vuong, Q. H. (2018). The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 5.
- Vuong, Q. H. (2019). Computational entrepreneurship: from economic complexities to interdisciplinary research. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(1), 117-129.
- Vuong, Q. H., La, V. P., Vuong, T. T., Nguyen, V. H., Ho, M. T., Nguyen, T. H. K., Bui, Q. K., & Ho, M. T. (2018). Cultural additivity: Behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism in folktales. Palgrave Communications, 4, 143.
- Wang, M.-T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722-737.
- Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.