An examination of the e-commerce technology drivers in the real estate industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.39
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #4, pp. 468-481
- Cited by
- 1323 Views
-
227 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examined the factors that drive e-commerce technology adoption in the real estate industry in Qatar using the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) and sought to analyze the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, anchor factors, adjustment factors and cognitive instrumental variables and their effect on e-commerce adoption in real estate industry in Qatar. The study adopted a descriptive methodology and quantitative research design utilizing survey strategy. 350 filtered and screened questionnaires that were retrieved from the Quota sample from 59 real estate firms operating in Qatar were analyzed using AMOS. The results indicate that all the dependent variables have significant relationship with e-commerce adoption indicating that the original model used was a good fit, accounting for a large percentage of the variance associated with e-commerce adoption. However, the results also show that only perceived usefulness and anchor variables have positive direct effect on e-commerce adoption; perceived ease of use, adjustment variables and cognitive instrumental factors have notable indirect effect on e-commerce adoption.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L81, R10
-
References36
-
Tables2
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Path analysis diagram
- Figure 2. Unstandardized estimates model
- Figure 3. Standardized estimates model
- Figure 4. Model results
-
- Table 1. Cronbach’s alpha reliability statistics
- Table 2. Demographic characteristics of respondents
-
- Abbasi, M. R., Sarlak, M. A., Ghorbani, A., & Esfanjani, H. A. (2010). CSFs of e-commerce admission in small and medium size enterprises SMEs. African Journal of Business Management, 4(16), 3480-3490.
- Aggorowati, M., Iriawan, N., Suhartono, S., & Gautama, H. (2012). Restructuring and expanding technology Acceptance Model Structural equation model and Bayesian Approach. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 496-504.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Al-Abdallah, G. M. (2013). The Effect of Customer-Company Relationship on Internet Adoption in Jordanian Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 5(4).
- Al-Abdallah, G. M. (2015). The impact of Internet marketing research on achieving competitive advantage. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(1), 619-627.
- Al-Abdallah, G. M., Abdallah, A. B., & Hamdan, B. K. (2014). The impact of supplier relationship management on competitive performance of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), 192-202.
- Al-Abdallah, G. M., Al- Khawaldeh, K. H., & Al-Hadid, A. Y. (2014). Internet Usage and Traditional Distribution Channels: The Moderating Effect of the Firm’s Size in Jordan. International Business Research, 7(3), 81.
- Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2014). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27-50.
- Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143-155.
- Almousa, M. (2013). Barriers to E-Commerce Adoption: Consumers’ Perspectives from a Developing Country. iBusiness, 5(2), 65-71.
- Balnaves, M., & Caputi, P. (2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. London: Sage.
- Barrett, P. (2007). Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824.
- Çelik, H. E., & Yilmaz, E. (2011). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for Adoption Of E-Shopping By Consumers In Turkey. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(2), 152- 164.
- Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions (Working Papers on Information Systems). All Sprouts Content, 290, 1-23.
- Colliers International (2013). Doha, Qatar: Real estate market Overview.
- Cosgun, V., & Dogerlioglu, O. (2012). Critical Success Factors Affecting E-commerce Activities of Small and Medium Enterprises. Information Technology Journal, 11(12), 1664-1676.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- Dholakia, N. (2002). Global E-commerce and Online Marketing: Watching the Evolution. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Dickinger, A., Arami, M., & Meyer, D. (2008). The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 4.
- Edwin, A. M., & Peter, M. J. (2014). Drivers and Inhibitors to E-Commerce Adoption among SMEs in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 5(3), 192-199.
- Ernst, C. H., Wedel, K., & Rothlauf, F. (2014). Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Technologies: Combining the Technology Acceptance Model with the Didactic Circle. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1-7.
- Gregory, S. (2011). The Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior Applied to Business Decisions: A Selective Annotated Bibliography. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 9(1), 43- 50.
- Hussain, T. P. (2011). Research Methodology in Physical Education. New York: Pinnacle technologies.
- Kim, S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information and Management, 45(6), 387-393.
- Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. London: New Age International.
- Lee, S., Ha, S., & Widdows, R. (2011). Consumer responses to high-technology products: Product attributes, cognition, and emotions. Journal of business research, 64(11), 1195-1200.
- Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2013). Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods: From Hypothesis to Results. London: John Wiley and Sons.
- Neale, J., & Strang, J. (2015). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods to optimize patient reported outcome measures. Addiction, 110(8), 1215-1216.
- Novikov, A. M., & Novikov, D. (2013). Research Methodology: from philosophy to Science. London: CRC Press.
- Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325- 366.
- Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999- 1007.
- Priem, R. L., Li, S., & Carr, J. C. (2012). Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management. Research Journal of management, 38(1), 346-374.
- Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2007). Research Methods for Social Work. London: Cengage Learning.
- Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
- Zahra, F. (2015) Qatar is an emerging real estate market backed by a strong government.