Formation of the national tourism system of Ukraine

  • Received September 29, 2017;
    Accepted November 2, 2017;
    Published January 31, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Anatoly Mazaraki
    ORCID ,
    Margarita Boiko
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Myroslava Bosovska
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Nadiia Vedmid
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Alla Okhrimenko
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.07
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 68-84
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    15 articles
  • 1865 Views
  • 430 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Tourism is an important factor in the development of the national economy. The share of tourism in the structure of Ukraine’s GDP is 7.8%. Ukraine, having a considerable tourist potential for the formation of tourist flows, is ranked 85th among 139 countries of the world in terms of tourism attractiveness. According to the findings of the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), the concentration of natural and recreational resources, objects of the world cultural and historical heritage can provide an annual increase in tourist flows to Ukraine by 4-6%.
Under the conditions of unstable external environment and unfavorable conditions of the tourism market, an actual scientific task is to develop the theoretical and applied basis for the formation of the national tourism system. Conceptually, this process must be consistent with the strategic understanding of the need to take into account the mental, institutional, cultural and informational influences on the economic interests of entities, which form a functional, sectoral, socio-economic, institutional and environmental subsystem of the national tourism system. This will make it possible to determine target priorities of such activity not only in accordance with the development of destinations, but also taking into account the possibility of obtaining socio-economic effects, in particular, synergistic, multiplicative and cumulative ones.
The goal of the study is to substantiate the essence of the national tourism system (NTS) based on the comparative analysis of the definitions of “tourism”, “tourism system”, “economic system”, “national socio-economic system”, which became a scientific foundation for determining the scientific basis of the national tourism system, its subjects and objects, conditions, goals, and results of formation. For the science development it is also important to obtain results on the structure and evaluation of the national tourism system effectiveness.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Dynamics and forecast indicators of the development of tourist activity in the world according to the number of arrivals (million)
    • Figure 2. Conceptual principles of the functioning and development of the national tourism system
    • Figure 3. The structure of the national tourism system
    • Figure 4. The hierarchy of the levels of tourism systems
    • Figure 5. Economic contribution of the national tourism system to the GDP of Ukraine in 2011–2027 (billion UAH, real prices, 2016)
    • Figure 6. Configuration of the NTS functioning and development
    • Table 1. Identification of the studies of the national socio-economic systems in Ukraine
    • Alexandrova, A. Y. (2002). Territorial organization of the socio-economic system of international tourism. The dissertation author’s abstract doctor of geographical sciences (special: 25.00.24 Economic, social and political geography), Moscow, Moscow State University, 2002.
    • Aleynikova, O. (2010). National Agricultural and Food System as an Object of State Regulation. Investments: Practice and Experience, 9, 90-93.
    • Amosha, O. (2015). National Innovation System of Ukraine in the Context of International Comparisons. Economic Bulletin Donbass, 1, 115-121.
    • Ashley, C., De Brine, P., Lehr, A., & Wilde, H. (2007). The Role of the Tourism Sector in Expanding Economic Opportunity. The Fellows of Harvard College, Overseas Development Institute.
    • Bieger, T. (2004). Tourismuslehre – Ein Grundriss. Haupt, Bern.
    • Bieger, T., & Wittmer, A. (2006). Air transport and tourism – Perspectives and challenges for destinations, airlines and governments. Journal of Air Transport Management, 12, 40-46.
    • Bil, M., Tretyak, G., & Krynik O. (2009). The mechanism of state administration of the tourism industry (regional aspect). Kyiv, NADU, 40.
    • Boiko, M. (2010). Valuably oriented tourism management. Kyiv, KNTEU, 524 р.
    • Boyko, M. (2016). The effect of animation in tourism: constraints and opportunities. Foreign trade: economy, finance, law, 4, 23-32.
    • Bosovskaya, M. V. (2015). Integration processes in tourism. Kyiv, KNTEU, 832 p.
    • Buckley, R., Gretzel. U., Scott, D., Weaver, D., & Becken, S. (2015). Tourism megatrends. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1), 59-70.
    • Butler, R., & Hinch, T. (2007). Tourism and Indigenous Peoples: Issues and Implications. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 400 p.
    • Carrillo-Hidalgo, I., & Pulido Fernandez, J. I. (2012). Tourism funding by international financial institutions. A critical analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9(3), 76-92.
    • Cherevichko, T. V. (2015). Tourism as a system: research methodology, Concept, 7.
    • Cornelissen, S. (2005). The Global Tourism System: Governance, Development and Lessons from South Africa (New Directions in Tourism Analysis). New York: Routledge, 206 p.
    • Dannikov, V. V. (2004). Holdings in the oil and gas business: strategy and management. Moscow: Elvoys-M, 464 p.
    • Danylyshyn, B. (2008). Formation of a homogeneous national economic system: socio-economic aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 7, 3-11.
    • Darbellay, F., & Stock M. (2012). Tourism as complex interdisciplinary research object. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 441-458.
    • Demchyshak, N. B. (2016). National Innovation System as an Object of Financial Regulation. Economics and the State, 10, 9-13.
    • Dodd, J., & Sharma, V. (2012). Leisure and Tourism: Cultural Paradigms. Rawat Publications: Jaipur, pp. 154-156.
    • Dombrovska, S. (2015). State regulation of qualitative development of the national education system of Ukraine. Actual problems of public administration, 1, 82-86.
    • Dredge, D. (2016). Of things to come: Tourism and hospitality education in a post-industrial age. The Business of Tourism, 17, 19-23.
    • Fedulova, L. I. (2007). Financial Component in the National Innovation System. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 14-21.
    • Fletcher, J. E. (1989). Input-Output Analysis and Tourism Impact Studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 16, 514-529.
    • Frechtling, D. (2010). The Tourism Satellite Account – A Primer. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 136-153.
    • Freyer, W. (2001). Tourismus: Einfuhrung in die Fremdenverkehrsokonomie (7 Auflage). Munchen, Oldenburg, 584 р.
    • Gerasymenko, V. G. (2013). Development of the theory of the system approach in relation to the study of tourism. Vestnik National Academy of Tourism, 2(26), 11-15.
    • Gryshova I., Odrekhivsky M., & Safonov, V. (2016). Socio-econommic background and methodological aspects of building a national recreational innovation system. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics, 1(1), 59-67.
    • Gunn, C. (2002). Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts, Cases. T. Var (4th ed.), New York: Routledge, 464 p.
    • Gurovа V. (2015). Methodology and key determinants of building an effective national innovation system. International Economic Policy, 2, 149-169.
    • Hall, C. M. (2005). Systems of surveillance and control: Commentary on an analysis of institutional contributors to three major academic tourism journals: 1992–2001. Tourism Management, 26(5), 653-656.
    • Holden. A. (2006). Tourism Studies and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge, 228 p.
    • Ielenicz, M., & Simoni, S. (2013). The tourism system – main directions in evaluating its operation. Rev. Roum. Geogr./ Rom. Journ. Geogr., 57(1), 25-31.
    • Ilchenko, S. V (2015). Modern forms of development of the national transport system. Economic Innovations, 60(1), 172-178.
    • Jafari, J. (2003). Research and scholarship: the basis of tourism education. Journal of Tourism Studies, 14(1), 6-16.
    • Kaspar, C. (1975). Die Fremdenverkehrslehre im Grundriss. St. Galler Beitrage zum Fremdenverkehr und zur Verkehrswirtschaft. Riehe Tourismus. Bd.1. Haupt, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien.
    • Kozmenko, О., Poluliakhova, О., & Iastremska, О. (2015). Analysis of countries’ investment attractiveness in the field of tourism industry. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(3), 56-63.
    • Kruzhanin, V. I. (2011). Trends in the development of fundamental and applied research in tourism and recreation. Vestnik RMAT, 3, 25-33.
    • Kyrychenko, K. I. (2015). Problems of Integration of the National Education System into the European Educational Space. Aspects of Public Administration, 11-12, 104-108.
    • Lange, L. (2011). Exploring the leakage effect in tourism in developing countries. Diploma thesis, International University of applied sciences, Bonn, 122 p.
    • Lazanski, T. J., & Kljajić, M. (2006). Systems approach to complex systems modelling with special regards to tourism. Kybernetes, 35(7/8), 1048-1058.
    • Leiper, N. (1979). The Framework of Tourism: Towards a Definition of Tourism, Tourist and the Tourist Industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 390-407.
    • Levkovska, L. V. (2011). Functioning of corporations in the national economic system. Effective economy, 6.
    • Lynnyk, S. O. (2012). Modern problems of management of the national health care system and ways to overcome them. Bulletin of social hygiene and health care organizations of Ukraine, 3, 46-52.
    • Lytvyn, Y. O. (2012). The National Agricultural and Food System as an Object of Regulation, Scientific Works of the Black Sea State University named Petro Mohyla. Sir: Public Administration, 194(182), 97-101.
    • Lytvynenko, M. V. (2015). Principles of the National Health Care System in Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2, 198-206.
    • Lyubitseva, O. O. (2002). Market of tourist services (geospatial aspects). Kyiv: AlterPres, 436 p.
    • Macchiavelli, A. (2001). Tourist destinations as integrated systems. Tourism Review, 56(3/4), 6-11.
    • Maik, I. (2012). Analysis of the development of the national legal system of Ukraine through the prism of the synergetic approach in comparative law. Forum of Law, 4, 610-616.
    • Markova, I. C. (2011). National Tourist Economic System. Scientific Notes by Komsom. on the Amur State Technical University, 1-2(5), 106-111.
    • Mazaraki, A., Boiko, M., & Mykhailichenko G. (2013a). National Tourist Brand: Priorities And Formation Resources. Economic Annals–XXI, 9-10(1), 42-46.
    • Mazaraki A., & Vedmid, N. (2013b). Semantic modeling of service management of sanato-rium resort and health enterprises. Еconomic Annals–XXI, 7-8(1), 80-82.
    • Mazhar, L. Y. (2008). Territorial tourism and recreation systems. Smolensk: Universum, 212 p.
    • Mazurenko, O. V. (2013). National Innovation System – Basic Con¬cepts and Definitions. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Tavria State Agrotechnological University (Economic Sciences), 2(3), 220-227.
    • Melnychenko, O. A. (2010). Theoretical and methodological foundations of state regulation of tourism. State construction, 2.
    • Mill, R. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1985). The tourism system: An introductory text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Nesterenko, A. C. (2011). The financial system of Ukraine as a part of the international financial system in the context of the global financial and economic crisis. Actual problems of the state and the law, 3, 152-159.
    • Oliіnyk, A. A. (2016). National currency system in the conditions of globalization. Economic space, 110, 27-38.
    • Oparin, V. (2006). The financial system of Ukraine (theoretical and methodological aspects). Kyiv: KNEU, 240 p.
    • Ostrom, E. (2009). Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, U.S.A. pp. 408-444.
    • Perebeynos, Y. V. (2012). Conceptual framework for the development of the national innovation system: public-management aspect. State construction, 1.
    • Pylypenko, A. A. (2007). Strategic integration of enterprises: the mechanism of management and modeling of development. Kharkiv: INGEC, 380 p.
    • Rusenko, I. Y. (2014). Reforming the National Legal System of Ukraine: Philosophical and Legal Approach. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 1, 67-72.
    • Russo, A. P., & Richards, G. (2016). Reinventing the Local in Tourism: Producing, Consuming and Negotiating Place. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
    • Saprunova, V. B. (1997). Tourism: Evolution, Structure, Marketing, Moscow: Os-89, 160 p.
    • Sarancha, M. A (2010). Territorial tourism and recreation system as a complex socio-natural education. Bulletin of the Udmurt University, 6(3), 58-67.
    • Sardak, S., Dzhyndzhoian, V., & Samoilenko A. (2016). Global innovations in tourism. Innovative Marketing, 12(3), 44-50.
    • Sardak, S. Y. (2014). Global Regulatory System for the Development of Human Resources (Dissertation abstract) (36 p.). The Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Getman. Kyiv.
    • Savenko, M. D. (2016). International law in the national legal system according to the Basic Law of Ukraine. Scientific Notes of NaUKMA. Law Sciences, 181, 11-17.
    • Shaydarov, A. Y. (2006). Economic mechanism of formation, functioning and development of the regional tourist-recreational system: on the example of the Northwest region, author’s abstract. dis ... Candidate econ Sciences, St. Petersburg, 23 p.
    • Solter, M. (2009), Grundlagen der Tourismuslehre, unveroffentlichtes Buchmanuskript.
    • Stukalo, N. V. (2009). Global imperatives for the development of national financial systems (Dissertation abstract) (34 p.). Kiev: Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman.
    • Subbotin, T. V., & Sharygin, M. D. (2011). Territorial socio-ecological-economic systems. Perm: PSU, 269 p.
    • Sychevsky, M. P. (2013). Formation of the national food system: the present and the prospects. Food Resource, 1, 8-21.
    • The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2017). On approval of the Tourism Development and Resorts Development Strategy for the period up to 2026: Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine March 16, 2017, 168-p.
    • Tyshchuk, T. A. (2012). Estimation of interbank effects of stimulating demand for products. Economy and Forecasting, 3, 23-34.
    • Tkachenko, T. I. (2009). Sustainable Tourism Development: Theory, Methodology. Business Realities. Kyiv: KNTEU, 463 p.
    • Vysocan, O. S. (2014). Tourism as a system. Bulletin of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”. Management and entrepreneurship in Ukraine: stages of formation and development problems, 797, 25-38.
    • Wall, G., & Mathieson, A. (2006). Tourism: Change, Impacts and Opportunities. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    • World Economic Forum (2017). The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2017. Paving the way for a more sustainable and inclusive future.
    • World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) (2010). International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2008, New York, 134 p.
    • World Tourism Organization (2017). Tourism Highlights.
    • World Travel & Tourism Council (2017). Travel & Tourism economic impact Ukraine 2017.
    • Yavorskaya, M. (2016). The role of voluntary health insurance in the national health care system and ensuring social protection of citizens. Financial Services, 5.
    • Yukhnovsky, I. V. (2011). Essence, structure and problems of the formation of the national innova¬tion system of Ukraine. Visnyk of Sumy State University, Economics, 4, 169-174.
    • Zapalska, А., Vaidayanathan, G., & Brozik, D. (2012). Factors influencing performance of tourism and hospitality entrepreneurial businesses in West Virginia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 10(2), 8-15.
Related Articles

  • Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement

    Setyo RiyantoORCID , Endri EndriORCID Researcher ID, Novita Herlisha doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 162-174 Views: 9350 Downloads: 7706 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Technological developments are things that must be followed by companies to achieve a competitive advantage to improve performance. To achieve and improve performance, companies need active employee engagement by encouraging motivation and fulfilling their job satisfaction. This study aims to analyze the effect of motivation and job satisfaction on performance with employee engagement as a mediating variable. The research sample is Information Technology (IT) companies located in the cities of Jakarta and Bandung, Indonesia. Research respondents are system developers who handle system development activities for a project or part of an ongoing project. By using the convenience sampling technique 103 responses were obtained from IT developers. The research model analysis method uses Partial Least Square (PLS) with SMART PLS Ver 3.0 software. Empirical findings prove that motivation has a positive effect on the performance of IT employees, while job satisfaction is independent. Employee engagement does not directly affect employee performance, but the effect of mediation through motivation and job satisfaction can have a significant effect on employee performance. The research findings have managerial implications, in increasing high employee involvement, motivation needs to be encouraged to be more active and innovative, and facilitate the achievement of the desired results.

    Acknowledgment
    This study was made possible because of the full support of the Region III Education Service Institute (LL-DIKTI III), the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Research Center at Mercu Buana University, Jakarta.

  • Management of enterprise’s financial sustainability and improvement of its methods

    Galyna AzarenkovaORCID Researcher ID, Olena GolovkoORCID , Kateryna Abrosimova doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.02(1).2018.01
    Accounting and Financial Control Volume 2, 2018-2019         Issue #1         pp. 1-14 Views: 5326 Downloads: 753 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The article is dedicated to the solution of the relevant issue, concerning management of enterprise`s financial sustainability. Financial sustainability assessment is one of the most important principles of enterprise`s activity, which provides information about financial capabilities of the company at the time of its evaluation and for the future. It is a requirement for the enterprise activity, which provides a high level of competitiveness, efficiency and intensity. Thus, the restoration and strengthening of financial sustainability is a priority task for the enterprise, a basic precondition for its effective functioning. The purpose of the research is to analyze financial sustainability and to improve the methods and approaches of its evaluation. The following methods were used in this research: financial and economic analysis, economic and mathematical modeling, analysis and synthesis, comparison. The main results of the study are following: the theoretical and essential characteristics of enterprise financial sustainability has been determined; the financial status of PJSC “Turboatom” has been analyzed; the taxonomic index of financial sustainability has been calculated and the forecast of its significance has been made, the approaches to increase enterprise financial sustainability have been proposed.

  • The resource-based view: a tool of key competency for competitive advantage

    Akwesi Assensoh-KoduaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.12
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #3         pp. 143-152 Views: 4678 Downloads: 1069 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The increasing turmoil in the external organizational setting or business environment has focused attention on capabilities and resources as the primary source of competitive advantage. Obviously, this statement points to the application of the resource-based view (RBV) of organizational management. Nevertheless, what constitutes RBV remains an illusion in many quarters of organizational management, as scholars have managed to put up their personal ideas, and managed to converge on phenomenon-driven theories, in addition to RBV. This paper reviews the concepts of RBV in light of knowledge management to highlight some critical pitfalls that might have eluded the research community on the subject matter of RBV. To this end, this paper’s educational value lies in the fact that it simplifies the concept of RBV to the new researcher in a fashion that is capable of appealing to his or her level. A cross-sectional qualitative research approach was employed in an effort aimed at understanding the role of RBV in creating a sustainable competitive advantage and key competencies. A total of 20 relevant articles were searched from different databases and search engines, including Scopus, EBSCO, ABI Inform, IEEE, PubMed, Science Direct, SABINET, IEEE, Bing, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The findings indicate that RBV plays an important role and assists organizations not only create, nurture, and maintain competitive advantage, but also understand the collective resources needed to compete favorably in a globalized and highly competitive market. With expert knowledge workers at its core to provide support for knowledge creation, sharing, and utilization, the RBV principles discussed in this paper promise to guarantee a methodological step geared towards the achievement of competitive advantage. It, therefore, makes an incremental contribution to the RBV to attain modest improvement in organizational settings.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management