Integral assessment of business environment security

  • Received October 3, 2017;
    Accepted December 2, 2017;
    Published December 25, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Ganna Blakyta
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Olena Matusova
    ORCID , Halyna Lanovska , Victor Adamenko
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(4-1).2017.12
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #4, pp. 280-292
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    7 articles
  • 994 Views
  • 201 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The methodological approach to the integral assessment of business environment security is developed in the article; the blocks of factors of business environment security are identified and the indices which affect the formation of economic security of entrepreneurship are analyzed. The integral indicator for assessing business environment security is based on 6 indicators, which are the most significant elements of the business environment formation: the availability of basic economic freedoms, the favorable organizational conditions for doing business, the state of political and legal system, the level (quality) of life, resource provision and infrastructure development, innovation development. A comparative analysis of the integral indicator of business environment security of Ukraine with the Baltic countries, Black Sea region countries and the Visegrad Group countries is carried out. The article identifies interdependence between the business environment security and the share of unprofitable enterprises. The functional relationship of the business environment security with the number of bankrupt enterprises and the level of enterprises losses is substantiated as well. The model shows that the increase of environmental security leads to the decrease of a number of bankruptcies exponentially. The negative and positive factors which influence the formation of economic security of entrepreneurship are revealed.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Dynamic of the integral index of business environment security in Ukraine and the countries-leaders of the groups
    • Figure 2. Business environment security in Ukraine and the countries-leaders of groups in 2016
    • Figure 3. Dynamic of the integral indicator of business environment security in Ukraine and “countries-outsiders”
    • Figure 4. Business environment security in Ukraine and “countries-outsiders” in 2016
    • Figure 5. Stability of the level of business environment security, %
    • Figure 6. Relationship between the level of business environment security and the share of unprofitable enterprises in Ukraine
    • Figure 7. Relationship between the level of business environment security and the number of bankrupt enterprises in Ukraine
    • Figure 8. Relationship between the level of business environment security and the volume of enterprise losses
    • Table 1. Elements of the integral index of business environment security
    • Arhipov, A. (1994). Экономическая безопасность: оценки, проблемы, способы обеспечения [Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost: otsenki, problemy, sposoby obespecheniya]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 38-39.
    • Arsić, M., & Krstić, G. (2015). Effects of Formalization of the Shadow Economy. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
    • Bogomolov, V. A. (2009). Экономическая безопасность [Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost]. Moscow: UNITY.
    • Boykevych, O. (2011). Стратегічні пріоритети та засоби зміцнення економічної безпеки торговельного підприємства [Stratehichni priorytety ta zasoby zmitsnennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky torhovelnoho pidpryiemstva] (Ph.D. Thesis). Lviv: Lviv Commercial Academy.
    • Bravo, G. (2013).The human sustainable development index: new calculations and a first critical analysis. Ecological Indicators, 37, Part A, 145-150.
    • Cornell University, INSEAD, and the World Intellectual Property Organization. The Global Innovation Index.
    • Dronov, R. (2001). Подходы к обеспечению экономической безопасности [Podkhody k obespecheniyu ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti]. Ekonomist, 2, 42-45.
    • Gospodarik, Yu. P., & Pashkovskaya, M. V. (2016). Международная экономическая безопасность [Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost]. Moscow: Sinergia Publ.
    • Hrunin, O. (2002). Экономическая безопасность организации [Ekonomicheckaya bezopasnost organizatsii]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
    • Human Technologies. Analytical portal.
    • Iliashenko, S. (2003). Составляющие экономической безопасности предприятия и подходы к их оценке [Sostavly-auschie ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti predpriyatiya i podkhody k ikh otsenke]. Actual Problems of Economics, 21, 12-19.
    • Inglehart, R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336-354.
    • Klopov, I. (2010). Моделювання впливу загроз зовнішнього середовища на економічну безпеку промислового підприємства [Modeliuvannia vplyvu zahroz zovnishnioho seredovyscha na ekonomichnu bezpeku promyslovoho pidpryiem¬stva]. Economics and Management, 4, 109-114.
    • Kozachenko, А. V., Ponomarev, V. P., & Liashenko, A. N. (2003). Экономическая безопасность предприятия: сущность и механизм обеспечения [Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost predpriyatiya: syschnost i mekhanizm obespecheniya] (280 p.). Кiev: Libra.
    • Krivorotov, V. (2011). Экономическая безопасность государства и регионов [Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost gosudarstva i regionov]. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA Publ.
    • Kryveshchenko, V., & Eremenko, M. (2014). Загрози конкурентного середовища в системі економічтої безпеки підприємства [Zahrozy konkurentnoho seredovyshcha v systemi ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidryiemstva]. Marketing in Ukraine, 4, 56-62.
    • Kuratko, Donald F., & Hodgetts, Richard M. (2001). Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach. Harcourt College Publishers.
    • Liutak, O., & Kravchuk, O. (2013). Economic security of enterprises in the context of national safety of the state. Rocznik Bezpieczeсstwa Miкdzynarodowego, 7, 41-49.
    • Mamychev et al. (2016). Economic security and organizational culture: Theoretical approaches and categorical relationship. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(S1), 153-158.
    • Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development – a report to the Balaton group. Hartland: The Sustainability Institute.
    • Milenkovic, N., Vukmirovic, J., Bulajic, M., & Radojicic, Z. (2014). A multivariate approach in measuring socio-economic development of MENA countries. Economic Modelling, 38, 604-608.
    • Moran, Theodore H. (1993). American Economic Policy and National Security. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
    • Murdoch, C. (1977). Economic factors as objects of security. In K. Knorr & F. Trager (Eds.), Economics issuies & national security (pp. 67-98). Lawrence.
    • Neocleous, M. (2006). From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order. Security Dialogue, 37(3), 363-384.
    • Neu, C. R., & Wolf Ch. (1994). The Economic Dimensions of National Security. National Defense Research Division.
    • Nyznyk, V. (2013). Підвищення конкурентного потенціалу та економічної безпеки промислових підприємств за умов розвитку глобалізаційних процесів [Pidvyshchennya konkurentnoho potentsialu ta ekonomichnoi bezpeky promyslovykh pidpryiemstv za umov rozvytku globalizaciinykh protsesiv] (525 p.). Khmelnytskyi.
    • Oleynikov, Y. (1997). Основы экономической безопасности: государство, регион, предприятие, личность [Osnovy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti: gosudarstvo, region, predpriyatiye, lichnost]. Moscow: ZAO “Busines Shkola “ Intel-Sintez”.
    • Oliynyk, O., Adamenko, V., & Oliinyk, L. (2015). The Comparative Analysis of Financial System of Czech Republic, Poland and Ukraine. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 6(225), Vol. 63, 2067-2076.
    • Otenko, I., & Preobrazhenska, O. (2014). Analytical tools of enterprise economic security management. Actual Problems of Economics, 5(155), 203-209.
    • Pankov, V. (2011). Economic Security: Essence and Manifestations. International Affairs [Moscow], 57(1), 192-202.
    • Petrenko, L. M. (2014). Адаптивне управління економічною безпекою підприємства в нестабільному середовищі [Adaptyvne upravlinnia ekonomichnoiu bezpekoiu pidpryiemstva v nestabilnomu seredovyshchi]. Modeling and Information Systems in Economic, 90, 61-73.
    • Ronis, Sheila R. (Ed.). (2011). Economic Security: Neglected Dimension of National Security? Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
    • Sachs, J. D. (2014). What is Sustainable Development?
    • Sarić, R., Jeločnik, M., & Popović, V. (2013). The indexing approach in measuring of sustainable society. Economics of Agriculture, 1, 77-89.
    • Shiffman, Gary M. (2006). Economic Instruments of Security Policy: Influencing Choices of Leaders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Stetsenko, S. (2013). Формування інституційного середовища забезпечення економічної безпеки регіону [Formuvannia instytutsiinoho seredovyshcha zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky rehionu]. Agrosvit, 23, 69-72.
    • Strelcova, S., Rehak, D., & Johnson, D. (2015). Influence of Critical Infrastructure on Enterprise Economic Security. Komunikacie, 17, 105-110.
    • Sudakova, O., Popova, V., & Baditsa, O. (2015). Методичні підходи до оцінки економічної безпеки підприємства при взаємодії із суб’єктами зовнішнього середовища [Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva pry vzaiemodii iz subiektamy zovnishnioho seredovyshcha]. Economic Scope, 99, 201-210.
    • The Heritage Foundation (2017). Index of Economic Freedom.
    • The official website of the Judicial Branch of Ukraine. Judicial statistics.
    • The official website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
    • The Sustainable Society Foundation (2017). Sustainable Society Index.
    • The United Nations Development Program (2017). Human Development Index.
    • The World Bank (2017). World Development Indicators.
    • The World Economic Forum (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report.
    • Tymoshenko, O. (2016). Стратегічні пріоритети створення безпекового економічного середовища в Україні в умовах глобалізації [Stratehichni priorytety stvorennia bezpekovoho ekonomichnoho seredovyshcha v Ukraini v umovakh hlobalizatsii]. Economic Bulletin of the Zaporizhzhya State Engineering Academy, 3(03), 66-71.
    • Van de Kerk, G., Manuel, A. (2007). Contribution to Beyond GDP “Virtual Indicator Expo” – Sustainable Society Index (SSI): a new comprehensive index for world-wide use.
    • Vasyltsiv, T. G. (2008). Економічна безпека підприємництва України: стратегія та механізми зміцнення [Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemnytstva Ukrainy: sratehiia ta mekhanizmy zmitsnennia]. Lviv: Aral.
    • Vasyltsiv, T. G., & Grynkevych, S. S. (2015). Формування середовища економічної безпеки підприємництва в Україні [Formuvannia seredovyshcha ekonomichmoi bezpeky pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini]. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 24-27.
    • Veretennikova, A. (2012). Дослідження зовнішнього середовища як джерела загроз економічній безпеці підприємства [Doslidzhennia zovnishnioho seredovyshcha yak dzherela zahroz ekonomichnii bezpetsi pidpryiemstva]. Business Inform, 11, 182-185.
    • Veselovska, L. (2017). Factors influencing countries on their path to sustainable development: implications for organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management (open-access), 15(2-3), 474- 485.
    • Weller, C., & Logan, A. (2009). Measuring Middle Class Economic Security. J. of Economic Issues, 43(2), 327-336.
    • Zeman, P. et al. (2003). Czech Safety and Security Terminology. Brno: Masaryk University [in Czech].
    • Zerkalov, D. (2011). Экономическая безопасность [Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost]. Kiev: Osnova.
Related Articles

  • Justification of the list of indicators financial stability of the banking system

    Nataliia PohorelenkoORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ed.17(3).2018.01
    Economics of Development Volume 17, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 1-16 Views: 2068 Downloads: 351 TO CITE

    The generalization of scientific approaches to the assessment of the financial stability of the banking system has demonstrated the multivariance of views on structuring and listing of financial stability indicators and has made it possible to distinguish three main ones: on the basis of macroeconomic and macro financial indicators; on the basis of separate indicators; based on synthetic indicators. It is proved that the latter is most effective since the large number and variability of financial ratios used by different authors to assess the level of financial stability of banking systems does not allow for unambiguous results. A hierarchic structure of indicators of the stability of the banking system is proposed, which is characterized by the simultaneous existence of a certain number, not ordered in a heterarchic manner. In accordance with it, the integral index of financial stability of the banking system includes subindices: stability of the NBU, stability of system banks, banks with foreign capital, banks with private capital, financial vulnerability of the banking system. The expediency of accounting for the indicators of financial risk assessment: credit, liquidity risk, interest rate, investment risk, unstable resource base risk, which are characterized by such financial ratios as part of provisions for depreciation of loans in the loan portfolio, is justified in the composition of such a synthetic indicator of the financial stability of the banking system; the norm of instant liquidity; net interest margin; part of the provision for depreciation of securities in the securities portfolio; coefficient of instability of the resource base. Also, indicators for assessing the stability of the central bank were proposed: indicators of the adequacy of reserves; indicators of the effectiveness of monetary policy; indicators of the effectiveness of foreign exchange regulation; indicators of compliance of banking supervision with the main principles of efficiency. This approach will allow taking into account all the structural components of the banking system in the process of assessing financial stability, on the one hand, and in time to identify potential threats to the loss of stability, on the other.

  • Assessment of financial and economic security of the region (based on the relevant statistics of the Donetsk region)

    Bogdan DerevyankoORCID Researcher ID, Liudmyla NikolenkoORCID , Irina SyrmamiikORCID , Yevgen MykytenkoORCID , Iosif Gasparevich doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.23
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 283-295 Views: 1299 Downloads: 150 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In the article, the indicators of financial and economic security of Donetsk region are analyzed. The task of setting statistical estimation of financial and economic security of the region in modern conditions is based on the official materials of the State Statistics Service. For the possibility of further econometric modeling and forecasting, only quantitative indicators are used. This approach limits the number of evaluated indicators, but is considered the most objective. The analysis of financial and economic security is carried out in the context of two spheres of regional development: economic and social. The conducted analysis of the dynamics of the main socio-economic indicators of development of the Donetsk region for the period 2012–2016 allowed to identify the main trends characterizing the development of the region’s economy; provide an assessment of the financial and economic security of the region and identify some “problematic” places of financial and economic security in Donetsk region. Some of the most acute problems were identified in the assessment of financial and economic security and the features of state-legal provision of financial and economic security in the present conditions, as well as the proposed algorithm for monitoring the financial and economic security of the region. The analysis allowed to identify some “bottlenecks” of financial and economic security in the Donetsk region and to demonstrate that close attention and monitoring are required by the level of capital investments, the level of unemployment and the share of households with incomes per month below the legal living wage. The study enables to minimize the risks to form effective directions in assessing the financial and economic security of the region and proposes to optimize on a legal basis the whole mechanism for ensuring the financial and economic security of the region. As a result, the research revealed the most acute problems in assessing the financial and economic security of the region and proposed an appropriate algorithm for monitoring its level.

  • Evaluation of investment environment security in Ukraine

    Ganna BlakytaORCID Researcher ID, Nataliia GuliaievaORCID , Iryna Vavdijchyk , Olena MatusovaORCID , Anastasia KasianovaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.26
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 320-331 Views: 1027 Downloads: 193 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    World economic crises, internal economic and political instability have led to declining the level of investment attractiveness and investment security of Ukraine. The aim of the article is to propose an integral index in order to assess investment environment security and determine factors affecting the investment environment security of Ukraine. The suggested assessment is based on the data of World Bank’s indexes with the following blocks of factors: the availability of economic freedom, favorable organizational conditions for doing business, political and legal freedom, supply of resources and infrastructure development. The assessment of Ukrainian investment environment security and its Western neighbors – the European Union member states – has shown that it has lowest rank and highest volatility in Ukraine. The article identifies a direct statistical relation between the volume of foreign direct investment flows in Ukraine and the indicator of political stability and the absence of violence in the country. The main reasons of investment attractiveness reduction in Ukraine were as follows: conservative attitude of investors towards risks due to political instability, manifestations of violence and terrorism; deterioration of the overall financial situation of enterprises, which are the recipients of investments. The article substantiates that conditions for the investment attraction and secure environment in Ukraine have not been formed yet. The system of indicators and criteria for assessing the level of investment environment security should be expanded.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management