The development of methods of calculating the concession fees
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(3-2).2017.11
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #3, pp. 438-444
- 906 Views
-
426 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Developed and advanced way of calculation concession fee than provided by the Government Methodology from 04.02.2016. It based on the critical review of existing legal regulation in Ukraine, considering the inflation factor according to international requirements (UNIDO). This approach provides a reduced risk of members of concession agreement, protection of the project member’s interests and the financial viability of the project. Ukraine should follow international practice and rely on concession fee as an instrument of regulation, not only as a fiscal instrument. During the concession contest, where the criteria for selection of the winner is a concession fee, the Government should provide the object to concession if the amount of the payment will be higher than the maximum profit that can get a monopoly. Fee may take the form of a single or an annual payment. In the latter case, reasonable discount rate must be set to calculate the present value of the stream of payments. Confirmed: the need pre-planning examination of normative documents, the use of sentences of the international experience of evaluation of projects, the revised rate of interest a concession payment, the desirability of calculating asset values using their average annual cost, taking into account the special conditions of the project.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E65, G28, H54, L32
-
References21
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Braley, R., & Myers, C. (1997). Принципы корпоративных финансов [Printsipy korporativnykh finansov] (1120 р.). M.: Olimp-Biznes.
- Budnik V. A. (2013). Обоснование величины концессионных платежей по договорам концессии на строительство [Obosnovanie velichiny kontsessionnykh platezhey po dogovoram kontsessii na stroitelstvo]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, 4(48), 334-337.
- Buxbaum, J., & Ortiz, I. (2007). Protecting the public interest: The role of long-term concession agreements for providing transportation infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 13(2), 126-137.
- Ferrari, C., & Basta, M. (2009). Port concession fees based on the price-cap regulation: A DEA approach Maritime. Economics & Logistics, 11(1), 121-135.
- Hanaoka, S., & Palapus, H. (2012). Reasonable concession period for build-operate-transfer road projects in the Philippines. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 938-949.
- Kifak, A., Kolodiazhnyi, D. (2013). Как улучшить концессионное законодательство [Kak uluchshit kontsessionnoe zakonodatelstvo]. Porty Ukrainy, 1, 62-64.
- Komorita, S. S., & Brenner, A. R. (1968). Bargaining and concession making under bilateral monopoly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(1), 15-20.
- Nasirzadeh, F., Khanzadi, M., & Alipour, M. (2014). Determination of concession period in build-operate-transfer projects using fuzzy logic. Iranian Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 7(2), 423-442.
- Notteboom, T. (2006). Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 437-455.
- Pallis, A. A., Notteboom, T., & De Langen, P. W. (2008). Concession Agreements and Market Entry in the Container Terminal Industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 10(1), 209-228.
- Rye, T., & Scotney, D. (2004). The factors influencing future concessionary bus patronage in Scotland and their implications for elsewhere. Transport Policy Volume, 11(2), 133-140.
- Shen, L. Y., & Wu, Y. Z. (2005). Risk Concession Model for Build/Operate/Transfer Contract Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(2), 211-220.
- Stiller, D. (2010). Assessing the development of airport concession models and financing in times of a financial crisis. Journal of Airport Management, 4(3), 226-234.
- Vassallo, J. M. (2006). Traffic risk mitigation in highway concession projects: the experience of Chile. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 40(3), 359-381.
- Vassallo, J., & Gallego, J. (2005). Risk Sharing in the New Public Works Concession Law in Spain. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1932, 1-8.
- Wyman, M., Barborak, J., Inamdar, N., & Stein, T. (2011). Best Practices for Tourism Concessions in Protected Areas: A Review of the Field. Forests, 2(4), 913-928.
- Zagorodniy, A. G., & Voznyuk, G. L. (2007). Фінансово-еко¬номічний словник [Finansovo-ekonomichnyi slovnyk] (1072 p.). Kyiv: Znannya.
- Методика розрахунку концесійних платежів: Постанова КМ України No 130 [Metodyka rozrakhunku kontsesiynykh platezhiv: Postanova KM Ukrainy No 130]. (2016). Uryadovyy kuryer, 50, 14.
- Методика розрахунку платежів за надання концесії на будівництво та експлуатацію автомобільних доріг: Постанова КМ України No 319 [Metodyka rozrakhunku platezhiv za nadannya kontsesiyi na budivnytstvo ta ekspluatatsiyu avtomobilnykh dorih: Postanova KM Ukrajiny No 319]. (2003). Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, 11.
- Порядок розрахунку платежів за надання в концесію вітрових електростанцій. Постанова КМ України № 868 [Poriadok rozrakhunku platezhiv za nadannia v kontsesiiu vitrovykh elektrostantsii. Postanova Ukrainy No. 868]. (2001). Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, 31.
- Програма діяльності Кабінету Міністрів України [Prohrama diialnosti Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy]. (2016). Uryadovyy kuryer, 75, 4-5.