Evaluating pedagogical approaches to enhance students’ comprehension in maritime English: The Norwegian case
-
Author(s)Viktoriia KoiloLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-9970
,
Maksym ZaitsevLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1065-9852
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(2).2024.04
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2024, Issue #2, pp. 39-50
- 145 Views
-
23 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to test and evaluate various pedagogical strategies that can improve students’ comprehension of Maritime English course materials and help them confidently participate in English-based assessments. A comparative research methodology was employed, focusing on integrating specific strategies and tools into the curricula of maritime programs. The study focused on the Norwegian case at NTNU in Ålesund, featuring a 3-year Shipping Management program (Bachelor’s degree) with 45-60 students.
The findings from the Norwegian case demonstrate a significant improvement in students’ willingness and ability to engage in English-language assessments, highlighting the effectiveness of the pedagogical approaches implemented. The study results align with existing literature, highlighting the need for continuous innovation in pedagogical approaches to Maritime English education. By the end of the course, 72.2% of students felt comfortable taking the exam in English, compared to only 25.8% at the beginning of the semester. Weekly lectures in English with presentations were identified as the most helpful tool, followed by group work, homework, and vocabulary lists. The use of digital interaction and software tools received a high score – 8.0 out of 10.0. The significant improvement in students’ confidence in English, along with their strong overall ratings of teaching tools, demonstrates the effectiveness of these methods in overcoming initial language barriers. Further recommendations include combining traditional teaching methods with modern digital tools to enhance learning outcomes. By focusing on student-centered approaches and integrating both traditional techniques and technological tools, institutions can foster the development of a more proficient maritime workforce.
view full abstract
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I21, I23, F60, O33
-
References25
-
Tables2
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Mentimeter survey, status identification at the beginning of the course (2021)
- Figure 2. Mentimeter survey, result identification at the end the course (2021)
- Figure 3. Mentimeter survey, status identification at the beginning (left) and the end (right) of the course (2021–2023)
- Figure 4. Average grades for TS200214 Maritime Procurement Course, Autumn 2021 (left – portfolio examination, right – exam)
- Figure 5. Importance of English in the Shipping Management Program, 2023
-
- Table 1. Four perspectives
- Table 2. Summary of reference group reports for TS200214
-
- Alibakhshia, G., Javaherib, R., & Labbafic, A. (2021). Academic and real-life task-based language needs of marine engineering students: Interface between students’ and subject teachers’ perspectives. Helion, 7(2), e05534.
- Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and ed-ucation: a systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7395-7419.
- Block, C. C., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension: Where we’ ve been and where we’re going. In Block, C. C. & Parris, S. R. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 19-37) (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
- Brunton, M. (2009). An account of ESP-with possible future direction. English for Specific Purposes, 3(24), 1-15.
- Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Gaete-Bravo, A. F. (2023). Digital Competence of Higher Education Students as a Predictor of Academic Success. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 683-702.
- Chkoniya, V., Gonçalves, F. C., & Batista, M. (2021). Education for the Digital Industry: Opportunities and Challenges of Experience-Based Expertise and Open Innovation. In Chkoniya, V. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Applied Data Science and Artificial Intelligence in Business and Industry (pp. 506-521). IGI Global.
- Dissanayake, A. K. (2017). A Case for Domain-Specific Research into Seafarers’ Use of English as a Lingua Franca. CINEC Academic Journal, 2, 43-47.
- Firth, J. R. (1951). Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press.
- Hrnić, M. (2022). The Attitudes of Students and Teachers, Future and Former Seafarers, Towards the Importance of Maritime English. Naše more, International Journal of Maritime Science and Technology, 69(1), 30-39.
- IMO. (1978). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978.
- Ismail, M. R. S., Rizani, M. S., & Rauzilan, M. I. M. (2020). A study on improving Maritime English performance among cadets at maritime universities. Maritime Technology and Research, 2(2), 82-89.
- James, A. J., Schriever, U. G., Jahangiri, S., & Girgin, S. C. (2018). Improving maritime English competence as the cornerstone of safety at sea: a focus on teaching practices to improve maritime communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17, 293-310.
- Kaka, A. (2022). Preparing for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Top Skills and Careers. Al-Fanar Media.
- Kulikova, I. (2023). Knowledge of Maritime Vocabulary as a Condition for the Competitiveness of a Maritime Specialist. Physics and Navigation Journal, 61(4), 98-103.
- Limbong, S., Jabu, B., & Basri, M. (2022). The Impact of Synchronous Learning of Marlins in Teaching Maritime English. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 2(3), 06-13.
- NTNU. (n/a). Reference groups - quality assurance of education.
- Oksavik, A., Hildre, H. P., Pan, Y., Jenkinson, I., Kelly, B., Paraskevadakis, D., & Pyne, R. (2020). Future skill and competence needs (SkillSea Project No. 601186).
- Peng, D., & Yu, Z. (2022). A Literature Review of Digital Literacy over Two Decades. Education Research International, 2022(1), 2533413.
- Romanova, O. (2011). The Importance of Multilingual Professional Awareness: Peculiarities of Teaching Maritime Vocabulary. International inter-higher school scientific and educational conference (pp. 25-34). Baltic International Academy: Latvia.
- Saridaki, E. (2023). The necessity of Maritime English for the shipping industry. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(45), 1908-1913.
- Sia T. C., & Said, M. H. (2019). The Importance of Maritime English Proficiency in Others Marine Related Undergraduate Programs. Proceeding of Marine Safety and Maritime Installation (MSMI 2018) (pp. 306-312).
- Şihmantepe, A., Solmaz, M. S., & Aşan, C. (2021). Improving Maritime English Oral Communication Skills in an Online Environment: Engaging Students as Teams. In Xiang, C. (Ed.), Trends and Developments for the Future of Language Education in Higher Education (pp. 272-292). IGI Global.
- Türkistanli, T. T. (2024). Advanced learning methods in maritime education and training: A bibliometric analysis on the digitalization of education and modern trends. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(1).
- Wang, L. (2023). A Study on the Reform of Maritime English Teaching in Higher Vocational Colleges from the Perspective of Linguistics. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 12(3), 30-31.
- Yurzhenko, A., Diahyleva, O., & Kononova, O. (2023). An overview of Maritime English teaching and its principles, with a focus on practical applications and best practices online. Educational Dimension, 9, 42-58.
Related Articles
-
Financial performance under stress: the case of the Norwegian maritime cluster
Viktoriia Koilo
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.08(1).2019.05
Public and Municipal Finance Volume 8, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 54-72 Views: 769 Downloads: 473 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe present study investigates the Norwegian maritime industry in terms of its economic activity during the period 2001–2018. The purpose of the study is to determine the financial state and to conduct the cluster analysis of the companies which belong to the Blue Maritime Cluster of Møre and Romsdal County.
The paper presents a structural analysis of key financial indicators of the maritime industry within four major segments: shipping companies, shipyards, ship equipment manufactures, and maritime design and service providers. The analysis sheds light on the impact of the 2015–2017 offshore crisis on the Norwegian maritime cluster activity, which makes up the essential components of the maritime industry.
The author suggests using Harrington’s desirability function to measure the firms’ financial state of two main segments (shipping companies and shipyards) that belong to the Blue Maritime Cluster of the Norwegian North-Western coast, which remains the most important area in Norway for shipbuilding activities. The obtained results reveal that during the analyzed period (2001–2018), companies had a satisfactory level of financial sustainability (with the peak in 2002 for shipping firms and in 2011 for shipyards). Nevertheless, there were several fluctuations and the most significant troughs were fixed after 2014. Moreover, it was defined that government policy plays an important role in an increase in the productivity, competitiveness of the maritime industry and supports more environmentally friendly shipbuilding.
Close
Knowledge and Performance Management