Forensic audit of public debt in the financial control system of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.01
-
Article InfoVolume 6 2025, Issue #1, pp. 1-12
- 15 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Forensic audit of public debt is an important tool for ensuring financial transparency and effective public finance management. In the context of Ukraine, given the difficult economic situation and high level of public debt, the use of forensic audit is of particular importance. The study aims to conduct a forensic audit of Ukraine’s public debt by assessing the consistency of financial statements of key government agencies, identifying discrepancies, and evaluating their potential impact on financial stability. The methodology includes a cross-analysis of financial data from the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, the National Bank of Ukraine, the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine, and the State Treasury Service. The study also includes an assessment of compliance with international public sector auditing standards (ISSAI, IPSAS, and OECD principles). The results show discrepancies in key public debt indicators between the different reporting institutions, with variations in total debt, debt service costs, and classification methodologies. Key findings indicate inconsistencies in the timing of data publication, differences in accounting methodology, and gaps in debt transparency. These discrepancies pose risks to the effectiveness of financial policy, external creditworthiness, and overall macroeconomic stability. The study concludes that strengthening coordination between government agencies and integrating forensic audit mechanisms into the system of regular financial oversight is necessary to increase the transparency of public debt and reduce financial risks. The proposed recommendations will help to improve fiscal management and ensure the reliability of financial reporting in Ukraine's public debt management system.
Acknowledgment
Prepared as part of a research project 101127602-EUEPDM-ERASMUS-JMO-2023-HEI-TCH-RSCH – "EU experience in public debt management: conclusions for Ukraine in the war and post-war period". However, the views and opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union or the European Executive Agency for Education and Culture (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M42, H63, H83
-
References38
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Algorithm for conducting a forensic audit of the public debt of Ukraine
-
- Table 1. ISSAI Structure 5400-5499 – Guidelines on Audit of Public Debt
- Table 2. Availability of public debt data in various government agencies
- Table 3. Comparison of public debt indicators according to different institutions: methodological discrepancies, frequency of updating, and accounting features
- Table 4. Recommended actions in case of discrepancies or inaccuracies
-
- Abdul-Baki, Z. (2019). The role of accounting in conflicts resolution: The case of PwC’s forensic audit of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(2), 261-279.
- Accounting Chamber of Ukraine. (n.d.). Official website.
- Adesina, K., Erin, O., Ajetunmobi, O., Ilogho, S., & Asiriuwa, O. (2020). Does forensic audit influence fraud control? Evidence from Nigerian deposit money banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 214-229.
- Aguirre, J. C., & Flores, M. C. (2019). La corrupción en Sudamérica. Una aproximación desde la auditoría forense [The corruption in South America. An approach from the forensic audit]. Espacios, 40(3), 27. (In Spanish).
- Álava, W. J. T., Lindao, M. A., Mena, K. S., & Soriano, G. M. (2021). Auditoría financiera-forense como herramienta de control y detección de fraude en la provincia de Santa Elena [Financial-forensic audit as fraud control and detection tools in the province of Santa Elena]. Universidad y Sociedad – University and Society, 13(4), 267-276. (In Spanish).
- Alrawashedh, N. H. (2023). Factors affecting organizational intention to adopt forensic accounting practices: A case of Jordan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 343-350.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2024). Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.
- Bilan, Y., Yurchyk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Mishchuk, H. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of public finance used for social protection of internally displaced persons. Public and Municipal Finance, 14(1), 23-40.
- Burke, M. P., & Opeskin, K. (2000). Audit in forensic pathology. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 21(3), 230-236.
- Chen, Z., Pan, J., Wang, L., & Shen, X. (2016). Disclosure of government financial information and the cost of local government's debt financing – Empirical evidence from provincial investment bonds for urban construction. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(3), 191-206.
- Deb, R. (2018). Financial audit or forensic audit? Government sector panorama. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 135-158.
- Encarnación, V. R. E. (2023). Auditoría forense: riesgo de auditoría, fraude y materialidad [Forensic audit: Audit risk, fraud and materiality]. Suma de Negocios, 14(31), 122-135. (In Spanish).
- Escolano, J. A. (2010). Practical guide to public debt dynamics, fiscal sustainability, and cyclical adjustment of budgetary aggregates. International Monetary Fund.
- Flores, D. A., & Jhumka, A. (2017). Implementing chain of custody requirements in database audit records for forensic purposes. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, (TrustCom/BigDataSE/ICESS 2017) (pp. 675-682).
- Handoko, B. L., Rosita, A., Ayuanda, N., & Budiarto, A. Y. (2022). The impact of big data analytics and forensic audit in fraud detection. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering (WCSE 2022) (pp. 67-71).
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (n.d.). International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI).
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021a). ISSAI 5410 Guidance for Planning and Conducting an Audit of Internal Controls of Public Debt.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021b). ISSAI 5411 Debt Indicators.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021c). ISSAI 5420 Public Debt Management and Fiscal Vulnerability: Potential Roles for SAIs.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021d). ISSAI 5421 Guidance on Definition and Disclosure of Public Debt.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021e). ISSAI 5422 An Exercise of Reference Terms to Carry Out Performance Audit of Public Debt.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021f). ISSAI 5430 Fiscal Exposures: Implications for Debt Management and the Role for SAIs.
- International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2021g). ISSAI 5440 Guidance for Conducting a Public Debt Audit – The Use of Substantive Tests in Financial Audits.
- International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (n.d.). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS).
- Kampanakis, P., & Yavuz, A. A. (2015). BAFi: A practical cryptographic secure audit logging scheme for digital forensics. Security and Communication Networks, 8(17), 3180-3190.
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.). State Debt and State Guaranteed Debt.
- National Bank of Ukraine. (n.d.). Official website.
- Ningsih, N., Arifuddin, & Usman, A.(2024). The impact of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and organizational commitment on whistleblowing intention: A moderating role of local culture. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(1), 162-173.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). OECD Standards on Transparency and Good Governance.
- Portilla, C. M. E., Zambrano, J. A. R., Quiñonez, L. M. C., & Flores, M. C. B. (2024). Auditoría forense y su impacto en las organizaciones públicas del Ecuador [Forensic audit and its impact on public organizations in Ecuador]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales – Journal of Social Sciences, 30(9), 410-421. (In Spanish).
- Sembiring, F. N. B. R., & Widuri, R. (2023). The effect of auditor experience, big data and forensic audit as mediating variables on fraud detection. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(6), 2324-2337.
- Shkolnyk, І., & Koilo, V. (2018). The relationship between external debt and economic growth: empirical evidence from Ukraine and other emerging economies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(1), 387-400.
- Shonhadji, N., & Irwandi, S.A. (2024). Fraud prevention in the Indonesian banking sector using anti-fraud strategy. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(1), 12-23.
- State Treasury Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Official website.
- Szezyńska, M., Huebner, E., Bem, D., & Ruan, C. (2009). Methodology and tools of IS audit and computer forensics: The common denominator. In Park, J. H., Chen, H. H., Atiquzzaman, M., Lee, C., Kim, Th., Yeo, S. S. (Eds), Advances in Information Security and Assurance. ISA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5576) (pp. 110-121).
- Tušek, B., & Klikovac, A. (2013). Analiza mogućih modela forenzične revizije u Republici Hrvatskoj [Analysis of possible forensic audit models in the Republic of Croatia]. Ekonomski Pregled – Economic Review, 64(2), 101-122. (In Croatian).
- World Bank & International Monetary Fund (IMF). (n.d.). Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy (MTDS) Framework.
- World Bank. (n.d.). Debt Management Performance Assessment (DeMPA). Methodology.