Blockchain technologies in accounting: bibliometric analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.04(1).2023.02
-
Article InfoVolume 4 2022-2023, Issue #1, pp. 14-29
- Cited by
- 444 Views
-
110 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of the paper is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on the use of blockchain technologies in accounting for the period 2013–2022 based on the use of a number of special methods and tools, including Scopus and WoS, VOSviewer, Publish or Perish, Google Trends, and Google Books Ngram Viewer. Based on the results of the bibliometric analysis of relevant scientific publications, a map of the relationships between the concepts of «blockchain» and «accounting» with other categories was formed, which allowed identifying seven clusters. Based on the results of the analysis of the evolutionary time block of blockchain technology research, it was possible to identify several main periods during which the main accents in this area changed. It has been proven that it was in 2020–2021 that the interest of researchers was directed to considering blockchains as tools for working with financial and accounting information. An analysis of the space-time dimension of bibliometric analysis in Ukraine showed that the publication activity of research on the use of blockchain technologies in accounting has intensified since the second half of 2021. Analysis using Google Books and Google Trends confirmed the absence of analogies in the dynamics of changes in search queries «blockchain» and «accounting». The use of bibliometric analysis tools allowed identifying the most relevant works by the searched terms. Relevance was mostly determined by the significance of the scientific work and the scientific cluster. On the basis of these works, key theses are presented, which will become the basis for further empirical research on the chosen topic.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, D83
-
References27
-
Tables0
-
Figures14
-
- Figure 1. Dynamics of published articles on the topic “blockchain AND accounting” in the scientometric databases Scopus and WoS for 2013–2022
- Figure 2. Identification of the interrelationship of “blockchain” AND “accounting” with other concepts
- Figure 3. Characterization of bibliographic clusters based on the analysis of “keyword matches” using VOSviewer
- Figure 4. Top 50 key phrases by relevance for “blockchain” AND “accounting”
- Figure 5. Map of the density of links between concepts in the context of the study “blockchain” AND “accounting” based on publications in Scopus
- Figure 6. Visualization map of the contextual-temporal dimension of research on “blockchain” AND “accounting”, published in the editions of Scopus
- Figure 7. Spatial component of the bibliometric analysis of “blockchain” AND “accounting”
- Figure 8. Visualization map of co-authorship of scientists (criterion – the country specified in the affiliation), whose general publications on blockchain AND accounting issues are indexed by the Scopus scientometric database
- Figure 9. Organizations funding research in the Scopus database
- Figure 10. Organizations funding research in the WoS database
- Figure 11. Structural analysis of “blockchain” AND “accounting” by subject areas
- Figure 12. Top 100 topics and thematic clusters in each research area by “blockchain” AND “accounting” categories
- Figure 13. Mention frequency analysis of the blockchain and accounting concepts according to Google Books sources
- Figure 14. Google Trends results of Internet users’ queries about “blockchain” AND “accounting” in the world for 2018–2022.
-
- Afaishat, T.AL, Khraim, H., & Al-Maadhedee, M. (2022). Effect of network strategic capabilities on digital transformation in Jordanian universities. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 247-257.
- Alkafaji, B. K. A., Dashtbayaz, M. L., & Salehi, M. (2023). The Impact of Blockchain on the Quality of Accounting Information: An Iraqi Case Study. Risks, 11(3), 58.
- Blockchain Association of Ukraine. (2019). Overview of the blockchain industry in Ukraine.
- Blockchain Association of Ukraine. (2022). Fintech Without Borders joins forces with Ukrainian financial associations to create a united front.
- Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21.
- Deloitte. (2017). Blockchain Technology and Its Potential Impact on the Audit and Assurance Profession.
- Deloitte. (2020). The blockchain galaxy, a comprehensive research on distributed ledger technologies.
- Deloitte. (2021). Global Blockchain Survey.
- Desplebin, O., Lux, G., & Petit, N. (2021). To be or not to be: Blockchain and the future of accounting and auditing*. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4), 743-769.
- EY. (2020). “Going public”, EY Global Blockchain Summit 2020.
- Fatima, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Javed, A. (2021). Impact of accounting information system on corporate governance: evidence from Pakistani textile sector. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(4), 431-442.
- Garanina, T., Ranta, M., & Dumay, J. (2022). Blockchain in accounting research: Current trends and emerging topics. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(7), 1507-1533.
- Kokina, J., Mancha, R., & Pachamanova, D. (2017). Blockchain: Emergent industry adoption and implications for accounting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2), 91-100.
- KPMG. (2018). Insights Pulse Survey Report.
- Kravchenko, O. V., & Shapoval, O. B. (2021). Blokchein tekhnolohii: stan ta perspectyvy rozvytku v Ukraini [Blockchain technology: state and development prospects in Ukraine]. Bulletin of the Khmelnytskyi National University, 6(2). (In Ukrainian).
- Mishchenko, S., Naumenkova, S., Mishchenko, V., & Dorofeiev, D. (2021). Innovation risk management in financial institutions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(1), 190-202.
- Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
- National Bank of Ukraine. (2021). Strategy of Ukrainian Financial Sector Development until 2025.
- Polinkevych, O., Glonti, V., Baranova, V., Levchenko, V., & Yermoshenko. A. (2021). Change of business models of Ukrainian insurance companies in the conditions of COVID-19. Insurance Markets and Companies, 12(1), 83-98.
- PwC. (2018). Global Blockchain Survey.
- PwC. (2020). Time for trust. The trillion-dollar reasons to rethink blockchain.
- Savchuk, N., Bludova, T., Leonov, D., Murashko, O., & Shelud’ko, N. (2021). Innovation imperatives of global financial innovation and development of their matrix models. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(3), 312-326.
- Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and auditing at the time of blockchain technology: a research agenda. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 335-342.
- Ukrainian Institute of the Future. (2018). Ukraina 2030 Е-kraina z rozvynutoiu tsyfrovoiu ekonomikoiu [Ukraine 2030 is an E-country with a developed digital economy]. (In Ukrainian).
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018). Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky ta suspilstva Ukrainy na 2018–2020 roky ta zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv shchodo yii realizatsii [Approval of the Concept for the Development of the Digital Economy and Society of Ukraine for 2018–2020 and approval of the plan of measures for its implementation]. (In Ukrainian).
- Wang, J. (2023). Research on the construction of accounting information audit quality control system based on blockchain. Security and Privacy, 6(2), e227.
- Xu, Y., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Shen, B., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Blockchain empowered arbitrable data auditing scheme for network storage as a service. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 13(2), 289-300.