Understanding accounting as a social and institutional practice: possible exit of accounting science from crisis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.03(1).2020.02
-
Article InfoVolume 3 2020-2021, Issue #1, pp. 11-22
- Cited by
- 2439 Views
-
270 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This article highlights the transformation of views on the understanding of accounting as a science in the new conditions for the functioning of enterprises operating in globalized markets in a dynamic competitive environment. The necessity of considering external factors (corporate scandals, financial crisis, etc.) in the development of accounting as a science is emphasized. The reasons for the need to confirm the scientific status of accounting are considered, the hypotheses concerning the gradual crowding out and replacement of accounting by information systems with artificial intelligence are refuted. Accordingly, the study aims to confirm the scientific significance of accounting and justify the need for its further development as a social science aimed at solving social issues and having a deeper social context. Various accounting models and identification of factors affecting their construction, as a result of which the goals of accounting are transformed, make the theoretical basis of this study. It is concluded that accounting is a social science that studies the features of the functioning of the accounting system as a social and institutional practice. Such an understanding of accounting science is considered one of the ways out of the existing crisis. The reasons for the lack of understanding among Ukrainian researchers of accounting as a social science are highlighted, and the ways to overcome them are suggested. It is proved that accounting, on the one hand, is a product of the social environment, an instrument for reflecting the economic reality of an enterprise. On the other hand, it influences the formation of social reality, being an instrument for shaping social processes and relations arising from the functioning of accounting as a separate socio-economic institute.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M410, D02, Z13
-
References40
-
Tables0
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Changing the purpose of the “accounting science”: a traditional approach
-
- Chapman, C. S., Cooper, D. J., & Miller, P. B. (Eds.) (2009). Accounting, Organizations, and Institutions (29 p.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
- Chyzhevska, L. V. (2007). Bukhhalterskyi oblik yak profesiina diialnist: teoriia, orhanizatsiia, prohnoz rozvytku [Accounting as a professional activity: theory, organization, prognosis of development]. Zhytomyr: ZhSTU. (In Ukrainian)
- Dillard, J. (1991). Accounting as a Critical Social Science. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(1), 8-28.
- Gaffikin, M. (2006). The Critique of Accounting Theory (Accounting & Finance Working Papers 06/25). University of Wollongong.
- Hopwood, A. G. (1983). On Trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in Which It Operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2-3), 287-305.
- Hopwood, A. G. (1985). The tale of a committee that never reported: Disagreements on intertwining accounting with the social. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(3), 361-377.
- Hopwood, A. G. (2007). Whither Accounting Research? The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1365-1374.
- Horvat, R., & Korošec, B. (2015). The Role of Accounting in a Society: Only a techn(olog)ical solution for the problem of economic measurement or also a tool of social ideology? Naše Gospodarstvo – Our Economy, 61(4), 32-40
- Ijiri, Yu. (1967). The foundations of accounting measurement: a mathematical, economic and behavioural inquiry. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Kantsurov, O. O. (2014). Instytutsionalnyi aspekt bukhhalterskoho obliku [Institutional aspect of accounting]. Kyiv: IAE Scientific Center. (In Ukrainian)
- Kayne, A., & Baer, J. (2017). Explore the future with Michio Kaku.
- Korol, S. (2017). Oblikove zabezpechennia nefinansovoi zvitnosti [Accounting reflection for non-financial reporting]. Biznes-Inform – Business Inform, 3, 346-352. (In Ukrainian).
- Krugman, P. (2009). The Big Zero.
- Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (1983). The Social Science. Encyclopedia. London and New York: Routledge
- Kuzina, R. W. (2015). Korporatyvnyi oblik i zvitnist v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy rozvytku [Corporate Accounting and Reporting in Ukraine: Current State and Prospects for Development]. Kherson: Grin D.S. (In Ukrainian)
- Lev, B. (2003). Nematerialnye aktivy. Upravlenie, izmerenie, otchetnost [Intangible assets. Management, measurement, reporting]. Moscow: Quinto Consulting. (In Russian)
- Littleton, A. C. (1981). Accounting Evolution to 1900. University of Alabama Press.
- Lowe, T., & Puxty, T. (1990). Accounting as social science: some implications for teaching and research. Directions: Journal of Education Studies, 12(1), 54-72.
- Makarenko, I. O. (2018). Konverhentna model obliku, korporatyvnoi zvitnosti ta audytu v umovakh staloho rozvytku biznesu [A converged accounting, corporate reporting and auditing model in a sustainable business environment]. Sumy: Vinychenko M.D. (In Ukrainian)
- Mennicken, A. (2002). Bringing calculation back in: sociological studies in accounting. Economic Sociology. European Electronic Newsletter, 3(3), 17-27.
- Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice: An Introduction. In A. G. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice (pp. 1-39). Cambridge University Press.
- Moser, D. V. (2012). Is accounting research stagnant? Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 845-850.
- Nesterenko, O. O. (2018). Udoskonalennia oblikovoi polityky dlia tsilei skladannia intehrovanoi zvitnosti v informatsiinii systemi pidpryiemstva [Improvement of accounting policies for the purposes of preparation of integrated reporting in the enterprise information system]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky – Global and national problems of economics, 22, 972-979. (In Ukrainian).
- Potter, B. (2008). Accounting as a social and institutional practice: perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus, 41(3), 265-289.
- Previts, G. (1984). Frameworks of American financial accounting thought: an historical perspective to 1973. The Accounting Historians Journal, 11(2), 1-17.
- Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Accounting theory (5th ed.). Thomson Learning.
- Scott, Dr. (1941). The Basis for Accounting Principles. The Accounting Review, 16(4), 341-349.
- Shortridge, R. T., & Smith, P. A. (2009). Understanding the changes in accounting thought. Research in Accounting Regulation, 21(1), 11-18.
- Stamp, E. (1981). Why Can Accounting Not Become a Science Like Physics? Abacus, 17(1), 13-27.
- Tinker, T. (1991). The accountant as partisan. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(3), 297-310.
- Valuev, B. I. (2002). Teoryia buhgalterskoho ucheta [Accounting theory]. Odesa. (In Ukrainian)
- Vollmer, H. (2009). Management accounting as normal social science. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 141-150.
- Vysocan, O. S., & Lutsyuk, I. V. (2017). Perspektyvy vidrodzhennia bikheviorystychnykh pohliadiv na rozvytok obliku v Ukraini [Prospects for the revival of behaviorist views on accounting development in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Hersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, 24(2), 118-122. (In Ukrainian).
- Vysochan, O. S. (2018). Vplyv stereotypiv na spryimannia oblikovoi informatsii retsypientom [The influence of stereotypes on the perception of accounting information by the recipient]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostroka akademia”– Scientific notes of the Ostroh Academy National University, 8(36), 90-94. (In Ukrainian).
- Walker, S. (2016). Revisiting the roles of accounting in society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49(2), 41-50.
- Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1979). The demand for and supply of accounting theories: the market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54(2), 273-305.
- Weber, M. (1920). Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism]. (In Russian).
- Yukhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2014). Osoblyvosti zastosuvannia profesiinoho sudzhennia bukhhaltera v umovakh formuvannia oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva: instytutsiinyi aspekt [Features of application of professional judgment of the accountant in the conditions of formation of accounting policy of the enterprise: institutional aspect]. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu – Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 2(29), 195-206. (In Ukrainian).
- Yukhymenko-Nazaruk, I. A. (2017). Rozvytok teorii i metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku v konteksti neoinstytutsiinoi teorii [Development of accounting theory and methodology of accounting in the context of new institutional theory]. Zhytomyr: O. O. Jevenok. (In Ukrainian)
- Zhuk, V. M. (2018). Rozvytok teorii bukhhalterskoho obliku: instytutsionalnyi aspekt [Development of accounting theory: an institutional aspect]. Kyiv: IAE Scientific Center. (In Ukrainian)