Leverage-induced profitability in Bangladeshi firms: An empirical analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.27
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #1, pp. 356-372
- 288 Views
-
92 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The intent of the inquiry is to extensively examine the impact of leveraged financing on firm performance in Bangladesh, revealing the subtle dynamics of leverage-induced profitability and emphasizing the importance of a balanced debt and equity structure for financial sustainability in emerging markets. To explore how financial leverage in an entity’s capital structure affects a business’s financial sustainability and analyze how it may be used to improve company performance, the study has employed a 22-year data set (2000–2021) from the Dhaka Stock Exchange. To perform Fixed Effect Regression based on the Hausman test, ‘Firm performance’ is used as the regressand, which was further proxied by Earnings per Share, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Basic Earning Power respectively. Alternatively, proxy variables for the regressor ‘Financial leverage’ include Debt-to-Equity, Debt-to-Asset, Current Liability-to-Equity, and Current Liability-to-Asset. The test has shown that leverage in the capital structure could lead to both favorable and unfavorable effects in emerging countries like Bangladesh. Age, along with Debt-to-Asset, has shown a substantial negative impact on Earnings per Share. Also, the Debt-to-Asset and Current Liability-to-Asset negatively affect the Return on Assets. However, Debt-to-Equity, Current Liability-to-Equity and Size have a substantial positive impact, however Age has a negative effect on Return on Equity. Lastly, Debt-to-Asset has shown a positive impact on Basic Earning Power. The findings suggest that balancing debt and equity is crucial to benefit from leverage-induced profitability, and the models can be extended or amended across industries to expand the study on this persistent leverage-induced profitability argument.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, C33, D53, N25
-
References38
-
Tables22
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical structure
-
- Table 1. Identification of the variables employed in the study
- Table 2. Model 1 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: EPS, and independent variable: Debt-to-Equity)
- Table 3. Model 2 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: EPS, and independent variable: Debt-to-Asset)
- Table 4. Model 3 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: EPS, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Equity)
- Table 5. Model 4 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: EPS, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Asset)
- Table 6. Model 5 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROA, and independent variable: Debt-to-Equity)
- Table 7. Model 6 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROA, and independent variable: Debt-to-Asset)
- Table 8. Model 7 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROA, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Equity)
- Table 9. Model 8 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROA, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Asset)
- Table 10. Model 9 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROE, and independent variable: Debt-to-Equity)
- Table 11. Model 10 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROE, and independent variable: Debt-to-Asset)
- Table 12. Model 11 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROE, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Equity)
- Table 13. Model 12 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: ROE, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Asset)
- Table 14. Model 13 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: BEP, and independent variable: Debt-to-Equity)
- Table 15. Model 14 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: BEP, and independent variable: Debt-to-Asset)
- Table 16. Model 15 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: BEP, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Equity)
- Table 17. Model 16 of fixed effect analysis (dependent variable: BEP, and independent variable: Current Liability-to-Asset)
- Table А1. Specification of the models employed in the study
- Table А2. Multicollinearity test keeping the Debt-to-Equity ratio as the independent variable
- Table А3. Multicollinearity test keeping the Debt-to-Asset ratio as the independent variable
- Table А4. Multicollinearity test keeping the Current Debt to Equity ratio as the independent variable
- Table А5. Multicollinearity test keeping the Current Debt to Asset ratio as the independent variable
-
- Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438-445.
- Ahmed, F., Awais, I., & Kashif, M. (2018). Financial leverage and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from KSE-100 Index. Etikonomi, 17(1), 45-56.
- Akbarian, S. (2013). The investigation effect of financial leverage and environment risk on performance firms of listed companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 8(3), 249-255.
- Baxter, N. D. (1967). Leverage, risk of ruin and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 22(3), 395-403.
- Berger, A. N., & Di Patti, E. B. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065-1102.
- Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
- Chen, H. (2020, December). The Impact of Financial Leverage on Firm Performance–Based on the Moderating Role of Operating Leverage. In Fifth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2020) (pp. 464-473). Atlantis Press.
- Das, N.C., Chowdhury, M.A. and Islam, Md. N. (2021). The heterogeneous impact of leverage on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 11(2), 235-252.
- El-Sayed Ebaid, I. (2009). The impact of capital-structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt. The journal of risk Finance, 10(5), 477-487.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-offs and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 1-33.
- Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404.
- Gweyi, M. O., & Karanja, J. (2014). Effect of Financial Leverage on Financial Performance of Deposit Taking Savings and Credit Co-operative in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(2), 176-184.
- Hossain, M. I. (2016). Effects of capital structure and managerial ownership on profitability: Experience from Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(9), 218.
- Islam, H., Rahman, J., Tanchangya, T., & Islam, M. A. (2023). Impact of firms’ size, leverage, and net profit margin on firms’ profitability in the manufacturing sector of Bangladesh: An empirical analysis using GMM estimation. Journal of Ekonomi, 5(1), 1-9.
- Kalash, I. (2023). The financial leverage–financial performance relationship in the emerging market of Turkey: the role of financial distress risk and currency crisis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(1), 1-20.
- Karim, R., Bhadra, H. K., & Chakrobortty, T. (2023). Impact of firm’s leverage on Financial Performance: Evidence from the pharmaceuticals industry of Bangladesh. Khulna University Business Review [Preprint].
- Khatoon, T., & Hossain, Md. M. (2017). Capital structure and firm’s financial performance: Evidence from listed cement companies of Dhaka Stock Exchange of Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Statistical Analysis, 4(1), 29-37.
- Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions. The Journal of Risk Finance, 8(1), 56-71.
- Majumdar, S. K. (1997). The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: some evidence from India. Review of industrial organization, 12, 231-241.
- Mangesti Rahayu, S., Suhadak, Saifi, M. (2019). The reciprocal relationship between profitability and capital structure and its impacts on the corporate values of manufacturing companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(2), 236-251.
- Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1151-1168.
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
- Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
- Oyelade, A. O. (2019). The impact of Firm Size on firm performance in Nigeria: A comparative study of selected firms in the Building Industry in Nigeria. Asian Development Policy Review, 7(1), 1-11.
- Puri, S. (2023). Interactions of leverage and firm performance: The moderating effects of agency costs. Rere Āwhio – Journal of Applied Research and Practice, 3, 86-94.
- Rabeta, M. (2020). Working Capital Management and Firm Performance of Companies in Pharmaceuticals & Chemicals Industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Science and Business, 4(8), 40-75.
- Rahman, M., Saima, F., & Jahan, K. (2020). The Impact of Financial Leverage on Firm’s Profitability: An Empirical Evidence from Listed Textile Firms of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 10(2), 23-31.
- Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
- Salim, M., & Yadav, R. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 156-166.
- Santosa, P. W., Setianingrum, A., & Yusuf, C. (2022). Corporate governance and leverage on firm value: Evidence of Indonesian large firms. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 26(4), 862-873.
- Schulz, T. (2017). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: An investigation of Dutch Unlisted SMEs (Bachelor’s thesis). University of Twente.
- Sharma, L. (2022). Determinants of profitability: a study on ceramic industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 161.
- Shen, W., & Lin, C. (2009). Firm profitability, state ownership, and top management turnover at the listed firms in China: A behavioural perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 443-456.
- Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Palmer, T. B., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 147-167.
- Tao, Q., Zahid, Z., Mughal, A., & Shahzad, F. (2022). Does operating leverage increase a firm’s profitability and bankruptcy risk? Evidence from China’s entry into WTO. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(4), 4705-4721.
- Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19.
- Wald, J. K. (1999). How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Research, 22(2), 161-187.
- Yat Hung, C., Ping Chuen Albert, C., & Chi Man Eddie, H. (2002). Capital structure and profitability of the property and construction sectors in Hong Kong. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 20(6), 434-453.