Demystifying the relationship between ESG and SDG performance: Study of emerging economies
-
Author(s)Tarun Kumar SoniLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-7864
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.01
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #3, pp. 1-12
- Cited by
- 1145 Views
-
313 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Companies and investors in emerging markets have started paying attention to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) issues. There has been a growing demand for aligning ESG disclosure of companies to UN SDGs (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals), so understanding how the firm-level ESG affects the country-level SDG is very important for evaluating the advances in ESG and SDG implementation in emerging markets. This study examines the linkage between firm-level ESG disclosures and their relationship with country-level SDG scores over ten years for three emerging countries: India, China, and Brazil. The analysis of 1,500 top-listed firms in these countries reveals an increasing trend of firms going for ESG disclosures and increased ESG scores over the years in the three markets. Out of the total sample, almost 75% of firms make ESG disclosures in Brazil, followed by 54% in India and 32% in China. Additionally, companies in all these countries tend to emphasize governance-related disclosures more, with Brazil having higher ESG disclosures than India and China. The correlation and causality tests indicate a significant positive correlation between mean ESG scores and country-specific SDG scores. The Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests provide stronger linkages between firm-specific Environment scores and SDG scores, indicating that a firm’s environment disclosures translate into higher SDG scores. However, the same is not valid for Social and Governance factors. These findings have important implications given the global attention on the linkages between ESG disclosure and SDG score.
Acknowledgments
The financial and infrastructure support provided by FORE School of Management, New Delhi in completing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, G38, Q01
-
References41
-
Tables2
-
Figures9
-
- Figure 1. Percentage of firms making ESG disclosures
- Figure 2. Percentage of firms making Environment disclosures
- Figure 3. Percentage of firms making Social disclosures
- Figure 4. Percentage of firms making Governance disclosures
- Figure 5. Average ESG scores of sample firms in three countries (2010–2019)
- Figure 6. Average Environment score of sample firms in three countries (2010–2019)
- Figure 7. Average Social score of sample firms in three countries (2010–2019)
- Figure 8. Average Governance score of sample firms in three countries (2010–2019)
- Figure 9. ESG coefficient of variation of sample firms in three countries (2010–2019)
-
- Table 1. Correlation between ESG and SDG (scores)
- Table 2. Pairwise Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests
-
- Ait Sidhoum, A., & Serra, T. (2018). Corporate sustainable development. Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility dimensions. Sustainable Development, 26(4), 365-378.
- Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910.
- Atan, R., & Razali, A. (2016). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure and Its Effect on Firm’s Performance: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Economics and Management, 10(S2), 355-375.
- Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 419-445.
- Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 79-98.
- Bose, S., & Khan, H. Z. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) reporting and the role of country-level institutional factors: An international evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130290.
- Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.
- Cao, J., Liang, H., & Zhan, X. (2019). Peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Management Science, 65(12), 5487-5503.
- Consolandi, C., Phadke, H., Hawley, J., & Eccles, R. G. (2020). Material ESG outcomes and SDG externalities: Evaluating the health care sector’s contribution to the SDGs. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 511-533.
- dan Perbankan, J. K. (2021). The impact of firm size, leverage, firm age, media visibility and profitability on sustainability report disclosure. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 25(1), 36-47.
- Dong, M., & Stettler, A. (2011). Estimating firm-level and country-level effects in cross-sectional analyses: An application of hierarchical modeling in corporate disclosure studies. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(3), 271-303.
- dos Santos Gaspar, J., Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2017). The traditional energy-growth nexus: A comparison between sustainable development and economic growth approaches. Ecological Indicators, 75, 286-296.
- Farooq, O. (2015). Financial centers and the relationship between ESG disclosure and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(4), 1239-1244.
- Fernández-Kranz, D., & Santaló, J. (2010). When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(2), 453-487.
- Galindo-Martín, M. A., Castaño-Martínez, M. S., & Méndez-Picazo, M. T. (2020). The relationship between green innovation, social entrepreneurship, and sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(11), 4467.
- Giles-Corti, B., Lowe, M., & Arundel, J. (2020). Achieving the SDGs: Evaluating indicators to be used to benchmark and monitor progress towards creating healthy and sustainable cities. Health Policy, 124(6), 581-590.
- Hieu, V. T., & Hai, N. H. (2022). The role of environmental, social, and governance responsibilities and economic development on achieving the SDGs: evidence from BRICS countries. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research, 36(1), 1338-1360.
- Kraay, A., Kaufmann, D., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Papers.
- Lueg, K., Krastev, B., & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organisational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268-277.
- Martins, H. C. (2022). Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102371.
- Matos, P. (2020). ESG and responsible institutional investing around the world: A critical review.
- Meshari Al-Hajri, & Fawaz Al-Enezi (2019). The association between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and accounting-based financial performance: a Kuwaiti evidence. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(1), 1-13.
- Mhlanga, R., Gneiting, U., & Agarwal, N. (2018). Walking the talk: Assessing companies’ progress from SDG rhetoric to action.
- Paramati, S. R., Ummalla, M., & Apergis, N. (2016). The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Economics, 56, 29-41.
- Pasquini-Descomps, H., & Sahut, J. (2015). ESG Impact on a Firms: International Evidence. Management International, 19(2), 40-63.
- Plastun, A., Makarenko, I., Krvchenko, O., Ovcharova, N., & Oleksich, Z. (2019). ESG Disclosure Regulation: In Search of a Relationship with the Countries Competitiveness. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 76-88.
- Plastun, O. L., Makarenko, I. O., Khomutenko, L. I., Osetrova, O., & Shcherbakov, P. (2020). SDGs and ESG disclosure regulation: is there an impact? Evidence from Top-50 world economies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(2), 231-245.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Nekhili, M. (2019). The contribution of financial entities to the sustainable development through the reporting of corporate social responsibility information. Sustainable Development, 27(3), 388-400.
- Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412-1421.
- Rajesh, R., & Rajendran, C. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247-1267.
- Sætra, H. S. (2021). A Framework for Evaluating and Disclosing the ESG Related Impacts of AI with the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(15), 8503.
- Schönherr, N., Findler, F., & Martinuzzi, A. (2017). Exploring the interface of CSR and the sustainable development goals. Transnational Corporations, 24(3), 33-47.
- Sharma, P., Panday, P., & Dangwal, R. C. (2020). Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17, 208-217.
- Simionescu, L. N. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility (csr) and sustainable development (SD). Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 10(2).
- Ullah, M. (2020). The influence of global, country and firm-level governance on social and environmental reporting: Evidence from developing countries (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sheffield.
- Van Brecht, D., Maga, A., Luciani, K., Sahakijpicharn, D., & Semmerling, A. (2015). Exploring the link between environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and market value of the firm: Evidence from Thai listed companies. ASEAN Journal of Management & Innovation, 5(2), 95-106.
- Van Zanten, J. A., & Van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1, 208-233.
- Witt, M. A., Kabbach de Castro, L. R., Amaeshi, K., Mahroum, S., Bohle, D., & Saez, L. (2018). Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research. Socio-economic Review, 16(1), 5-38.
- Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325-333.
- Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
- Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607.
-
The role of accounting in sustainable development
Inna Makarenko 
,
Alex Plastun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 4-12 Views: 7823 Downloads: 4774 TO CITEIdeology of Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals influence the transformation of business processes in the companies. Professional accountants are important part of this transformation. In this paper the role of accounting in Sustainable Development Goals achievement is discussed. Different approaches to structuring the role of professional accountants in Sustainable Development are investigated. Among them are types of roles that perform accountants, their professional functions, skills and competencies in the corporate environment. As the result a holistic vision of the role of accounting in sustainable development in the new economic conditions is provided.
-
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the Indian stock market – A sectoral analysis
Rahul Kumar ,
Prince Bhatia ,
Deeksha Gupta
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.28
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 334-346 Views: 7429 Downloads: 3507 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Indian firms listed on the NSE and analyze its impact on various sectors. In addition, a sub-sample analysis based on market capitalization was performed to understand the effect of size during extreme events. The sample consisted of 1,335 firms listed on the NSE India. A standard event study outlined by Brown and Warner (1985) was employed to analyze the price impact on the COVID-19 outbreak. The event windows from -10 days to +10 days were selected. The estimation window is 250 days. The Nifty 50 has been chosen as a proxy for market return. The sample firms witnessed a negative impact of the COVID-19 outbreak with a negative CAAR in different event windows. In addition, various sectors are classified according their responsiveness towards the COVID-19 outbreak into three groups: highly negatively affected, moderately negatively affected, and slightly negatively affected. The paper also points out that the pandemic substantially affects the above-median market capitalized firms than the below-median market capitalized firms, which contradicts the size effect phenomenon. The results assist shareholders in managing their portfolios and mitigate the systematic risk of their investments during extreme events such as a pandemic, wars, and others. This study is the first comprehensive analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on different sectors in India. It is also the first study to investigate the size effect anomalies during extreme events.
-
Environmental Performance Index: relation between social and economic welfare of the countries
Tetyana Pimonenko ,
Oleksii Lyulyov ,
Olena Chygryn ,
Maksim Palienko
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(3).2018.01
Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 1-11 Views: 3585 Downloads: 549 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe paper deals with the analysis of methodology of Environmental Performance Index. The authors analyzed and systematized the main existing integrated indices, which were used for evaluation of environmental, social and economic situation in the countries. The authors allocated the environmental performance index as a basis for analyzing the environmental policy of the country. In this direction, the authors analysed the main features, structure and indicators of environmental performance index. The authors allocated the world-leader countries with huge level of CO2 emissions. According to the results, the authors aproved that these countries should improve their environmental policy. Accordingly, they occupied less position in environmental performance index. For the purpose to analyze the relation between ecological, social and economic welfare, the authors analyzed score of sustainable development goal index, social progress index and gross domestic product per capita. The comparison analysis of findings showed that countries with good position on environmental performance index have the strong position on sustainable development goal index and social progress index. The authors suggested that Ukraine should orient to the EU countries with purpose to improve the environmental policy.
