Determinants of agricultural companies’ financial performance: The experience of Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine
-
Author(s)Serhii LehenchukLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3975-1210
,
Lyudmyla ChyzhevskaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-3529
,
Jitka MeluchováLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-3866
,
Nataliya ZdyrkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-3502
,
Volodymyr VoskaloLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-5866
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.10
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #1, pp. 99-111
- Cited by
- 794 Views
-
364 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the determinants affecting the financial performance of agricultural enterprises in Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine. As the main research method, panel data regression analysis was used to analyze data from 34 Polish, 123 Slovak, and 305 Ukrainian agricultural companies for the period 2017–2020. To analyze the links between financial performance measures and its determinants, nine models were developed based on three selected dependent variables (Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Return on Sales) in each of the countries studied. Seven independent variables were used, such as Leverage, Long-Term Debt to Assets, Short-Term Debt to Assets, Debt to Equity, Current Ratio, Asset Tangibility, Capital Intensity, and two control variables such as Size and Dummy variable for legal form. The most significant impact on the financial performance of agricultural enterprises has: for Polish enterprises – Return on Assets – Leverage and Asset Tangibility, Return on Equity – Debt to Equity and Dummy variable for legal form, Return on Sales – Current Ratio, Capital Intensity, and Size; for Slovak enterprises – Return on Assets – Current Ratio, Return on Equity – Debt to Equity, Return on Sales – Current Ratio, and Capital Intensity; for Ukrainian enterprises – Return on Assets – Leverage and Size, Return on Equity – Debt to Equity, and Current Ratio, Return on Sales – Capital Intensity.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G17, Q12, Q14
-
References49
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable definitions, calculation and abbreviations
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics (based on observations: 1:1 – 34:4 (Poland); 1:1 – 123:4 (Slovakia); 1:1 – 305:4 (Ukraine))
- Table 3. Results of panel data estimate parameter selection for each of the models used
- Table A1. Model 1-9 (ROA, ROE, ROS). OLS, FEM, REM, using the observations: 1-136 (Poland); 1-492 (Slovakia); 1-1220 (Ukraine)
-
- Achaku, M. M., Agbeaze, E. K., Ekoja, G. O., & Asortse, S. (2022). Green entrepreneurship and performance of small and medium enterprises in North-Central Nigeria. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 126-140.
- Arfara, C., & Samanta, I. (2022). The impact of internal marketing philosophy on a firm’s strategic orientation. Innovative Marketing, 18(4), 48-61.
- Beyer, D., & Hinke, J. (2020). European benchmarking of determinants of profitability for companies with accrual accounting in the agricultural sector. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 66, 477-488.
- BUREAU van Dijk, A Moody’s Analytics Company. (n.d.). Orbis.
- Burja, V., & Burja, C. (2017). Financial performance and the business risk in agricultural sector of Romania. Annals of the “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu. Economy Series, 3, 75-82.
- Câmpeanu V. (2022). The effects of the war in Ukraine – the global food crisis becomes more real. EUROINFO - Revistă lunară, 6(1), 3-15.
- Davidenko, N., & Wasilewska, N. (2021). Zapewnienie równowagi finansowej przedsiębiorstw rolnych na Ukrainie. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW, Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, 26(75), 40-52.
- Enjolras, G., Sanfilippo, G., & Soliwoda, M. (2021). What determines the capital structure of farms? Empirical evidence from Poland. Baltic Journal of Economics, 21(2). 113-133.
- Fakhrunnas, F., Astuti, R. D., & Anto, M. B. H. (2022). Determinants of non-performing financing in Indonesian Islamic banks: A regional and sectoral analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(4), 72-86.
- Fisun, I., Kucher, M., Stebliuk, N., Saihak, Y., & Prokopenko, O. (2022). Modeling development strategy of tourism companies under the influence of external and internal environment: Evidence from Ukraine. Tourism and Travelling, 4(1), 1-15.
- Gaisani, M. P., Fahmi, I., & Sasongko, H. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on the financial performance of Indonesia’s livestock industry. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 18(3).
- Glauben, T., Svanidze, M., Götz, L., Prehn, S., Jaghdani, T.J., Đurić, I., & Kuhn, L. (2022). The war in Ukraine, agricultural trade and risks to global food security. Intereconomics, 57(3), 157-163.
- Góral, J., & Soliwoda, M. (2021). On the profitability of Polish large agricultural holdings. Acta Oeconomica, 71(1), 137-159.
- Hampl, F. (2020). A statistical analysis of the financial performance of organic and conventional farms in the Czech Republic with respect to their size. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 66, 1-9.
- Hazudin, S. F., Sabri, M. F., Kader, M. A. R. A., Saripin, M. S., & Ridzuan, M. R. (2022). Social capital, entrepreneurial skills, and business performance among rural micro-enterprises in times of crisis. Knowledge and Performance Management, 6(1), 75-86.
- Ievdokymov, V., Ostapchuk, T., Lehenchuk, S., Grytsyshen, D., & Marchuk, G. (2020). Analysis of the impact of intangible assets on the companies’ market value. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 3, 164-170.
- Jusni, J., Aswan, A., Shafiai, M. H. M., Baharuddin, G., & Thaha, R. R. H. (2023). Key competitiveness of Indonesian small wooden furniture business. Innovative Marketing, 19(1), 59-71.
- Kalusova, L., & Badura, P. (2017). Factors determining the financial structure of Czech and Slovak agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 63, 24-33.
- Katchova, A. L., & Enlow, S. J. (2013). Financial performance of publicly-traded agribusinesses. Agricultural Finance Review, 73(1), 58-73.
- Kimetto, J. K., & Kiman, E. M. (2018). Determinants of Financial Performance of Agricultural Cooperative Societies in Baringo County, Kenya. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 5(2), 233-249.
- Knežević, G., Pavlović, V., & Bojičić, R. (2017). Does the board gender diversity impact financial performance in agriculture? Case of Serbian agriculture companies listed on stock exchange. Custos e Agronegocio, 13(3), 2-20.
- Kravčáková Vozárová, I., Kotulič, R., & Vavrek, R. (2019). Disparities in the financial performance of agricultural entities according to the legal form: the case of Slovakia. Applied Economics, 51(56), 5999-6008.
- Kuznyetsova, A., Boiarko, I., Khutorna, M., & Zhezherun, Y. (2022). Development of financial inclusion from the standpoint of ensuring financial stability. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 20-36.
- Lehenchuk, S., Raboshuk, A., Valinkevych, N., Polishchuk, I., & Khodakyvskyy, V. (2022). Analysis of financial performance determinants: evidence from Slovak agricultural companies. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(4), 66-85.
- Liu, L., Xu, J., & Shang, Y. (2020). Determining factors of financial performance of agricultural listed companies in China. Custos e Agronegocio, 16(4), 297-314.
- Mann, R., & Bilyk, A. (2017). Monitoring the factors influencing the efficiency of agricultural enterprises’ working capital of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 161-167.
- Martins, F. S., & Lucato, W. C. (2018). Structural production factors’ impact on the financial performance of agribusiness cooperatives in Brazil. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 606-635.
- Mijić, K., & Jakšić, D. (2017). The determinants of agricultural industry profitability: evidence from southeast Europe. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 13(1), 154-173.
- Mishra, A., Wilson, C., & Williams, R. (2009). Factors Affecting Financial Performance of New and Beginning Farmers. Agricultural Finance Review, 69, 160-179.
- Misiąg, W., Tomasz, S., & Rodzinka, J. (2020). Financial effectiveness and productivity of the agricultural sector in Poland. Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), 16(4), 65-81.
- Msomi, T. S., & Olarewaju, O.M. (2022). Dynamic panel investigation of the determinants of South African commercial banks’ operational efficiency. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(4), 35-49.
- Naushad, M. (2022). SME innovation and employee creativity: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 560-572.
- Novotná, M., & Volek, T. (2015). Efficiency of Production Factors and Financial Performance of Agricultural Enterprises. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(4), 91-99.
- Odalo, S. K., Achoki1, G., & Njuguna, A. (2016). Relating Company Size and Financial Performance in Agricultural Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(9), 34-40.
- Piluso, N., & Heron, E. L. (2022). The macroeconomic effects of climate policy: A Keynesian point of view. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 16-27.
- Pokharel, K. P., Archer, D. W., & Featherstone, A. M. (2020). The Impact of Size and Specialization on the Financial Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 8(2).
- Pronko, L., Furman, I., Kucher, A., & Gontaruk, Y. (2020). Formation of a state support program for agricultural producers in Ukraine considering world experience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 364.
- Serpeninova, Yu., Lehenchuk, S., Mateášová, M., Ostapchuk, T., & Polishchuk, I. (2022). Impact of intellectual capital on profitability: Evidence from software development companies in the Slovak Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 411-425.
- Shubita, M.F. (2022). Intellectual capital and industrial firms’ growth: Evidence from Jordanian manufacturing listed firms. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 325-334.
- Shubravska, O., & Prokopenko, K. (2022). The Agricultural Sector of Ukraine in the Global Food Market: Pre-war State and Post-war Prospects. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 3(4), 693.
- Singh, K., Misra, M., Kumar, M., & Tiwari, V. (2019). A study on the determinants of financial performance of U.S. agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(4), 633-647.
- Sokil, O., Kucherkova, S., Kostyakova, A., Podolchak, N., Sokil, Y., & Shkvyria, N. (2022). The Context of “Globalization Versus Localization” After the World Pandemic and Quarantine. In S. G. Yassen (Ed.), Digital Economy, Business Analytics, and Big Data Analytics Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1010. Springer, Cham.
- Sukhonos, V., Makarenko, I., Serpeninova, Y., & Qasimova, G. (2018). Classification and prioritization of stakeholders’ information requests according to sustainable development goals: Case of cross-sector partnership in Ukrainian food production industry. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4), 126-140.
- Vorobei, R. (2022). Determinants of Ukrainian agro-industrial companies’ stock price movements. Intellectual Economics, 16(1), 24-40.
- Vuković, B., Milutinović, S., Mijić, K., Krsmanović, B., & Jaksic, D. (2022). Analysis of financial performance determinants: evidence from the European agricultural companies. Custos e Agronegocio, 18(1), 285-306.
- Xu, J., & Jin, Z. (2022). Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Firms’ Financial Performance and Cash Holding: New Evidence from China’s Agri-food Sector. Agronomy, 12, 1951.
- Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Does Intellectual Capital Measurement Matter in Financial Performance? An Investigation of Chinese Agricultural Listed Companies. Agronomy, 11, 1872.
- Xu, J., Sun, Zh., & Shang, Y. (2021). Capital structure and financial performance in China’s agricultural sector: a panel data analysis. Custos e Agronegocio, 17(2), 445-463.
- Yavorska, T., Voytovych, L., & Voytovych, D. (2022). The impact of macroeconomic factors on the development of the insurance system in Ukraine. Insurance Markets and Companies, 13(1), 21-35.
-
Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development
Anis Ali
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 23-35 Views: 3087 Downloads: 1043 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIndustrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.
-
Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?
Sarwar Uddin Ahmed ,
Samiul Parvez Ahmed ,
Ikramul Hasan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 71-80 Views: 2863 Downloads: 1146 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhy banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.
-
Integrated reporting and financial performance of South African listed banks
Reon Matemane ,
Rozane Wentzel
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.11
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 128-139 Views: 2800 Downloads: 553 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe recent development of integrated reporting intends to address the limitations associated with corporate reporting practices. This paper aims to examine whether a statistically significant relationship exists between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. Secondary data was used, namely the integrated reports and annual financial statements of South African banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) for 2010–2014. For the period 2005–2009, only the financial statements were used, since integrated reporting was not yet mandatory. The research design was longitudinal and it combined qualitative and quantitative methods. Descriptive statistics and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) were used to explore the relationships between financial performance and integrated reporting quality. The results indicate that there is a positive relationship between integrated reporting quality (IRQ) and earnings per share (EPS). However, there is no significant relationship between IRQ and Tobin’s q (Q-Ratio), IRQ and return on equity (ROE), IRQ and return on assets (ROA) as well as IRQ and economic value added (EVA). Moreover, there are no significant differences on the financial performance of the listed banks before and after the introduction of integrated reporting.
