The impact of ESG inclusion on price, liquidity and financial performance of Indian stocks: Evidence from stocks listed in BSE and NSE ESG indices
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(4).2022.04
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2022, Issue #4, pp. 40-50
- Cited by
- 990 Views
-
271 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In recent years, investors have perceived that Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices significantly increase the value of companies’ stocks. This study investigates the impact of ESG inclusion on the price, liquidity and financial performance of stocks listed in the Indian ESG indices. Two major Indian benchmark ESG Indices, the BSE100 ESG and Nifty 100 ESG, were considered for the study. A total sample of 64 firms from the BSE100 ESG index and 86 firms from the Nifty100 ESG index were selected. The market model of the event study methodology was employed to measure AAR and CAAR and to demonstrate the effect before and after the inclusion of the stocks in the ESG indices. The empirical results show a highly significant negative AAR on the announcement day, i.e., on (day = 0) for BSE100 ESG index stocks and an insignificant positive AAR for Nifty100 ESG index stocks. In addition, the results also document a significant negative CAAR for BSE 100 ESG stocks and a positive insignificant CAAR for Nifty100 ESG stocks. Moreover, the liquidity test results revealed a considerable liquidity enhancement in the stocks posts their inclusion in the BSE100 ESG. At the same time, there were no significant changes in the liquidity ratio of stocks after being included in the Nifty100 ESG index. This study concludes that there will be a substantial improvement in the companies’ financial performance as indicated by EPS and market capitalization after their inclusion in the ESG indices.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G14, G56
-
References30
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Table exhibiting the variables of the study and its respective acronyms and measurements
- Table 2. Mutual fund schemes tracking NIFTY 100 ESG indices
- Table 3. Firm performance during the pre-and post-inclusion period of the BSE100 ESG Index and NIFTY ESG100 stocks
- Table 4. Average abnormal return (AAR) for the event window
- Table 5. Cumulative average abnormal return of BSE ESG 100 and Nifty ESG 100
- Table 6. Stock liquidity for the pre- and post-event window
-
- Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
- Barardehi, Y. H., Bernhardt, D., Ruchti, T. G., & Weidenmier, M. (2021). The Night and Day of Amihud’s (2002) Liquidity Measure. Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 11(2), 269-308.
- Białkowski, J., & Sławik, A. (2021). Do investors respond to changes in the composition of sustainability indices? Bank and Credit, 52(4), 319-338.
- Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
- Chang, Y. C., Hong, H., & Liskovich, I. (2012). Regression discontinuity and the price effects of stock market indexing. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(1), 212-246.
- Chen, H., Noronha, G., & Singal, V. (2004). The Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions: Evidence of Asymmetry and a New Explanation. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1901-1930.
- Clementino, E., & Perkins, R. (2021). How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 379-397.
- Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., & Vercelli, A. (2008). Global standards and ethical stock indexes: The case of the dow jones sustainability stoxx index. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 185-197.
- Cui, B., & Docherty, P. (2020). Stock Price Overreaction to ESG Controversies.
- Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the Market Respond to an Endorsement of Social Responsibility? The Role of Institutions, Information, and Legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461-1485.
- Erwin, G. R., & Miller, J. M. (1998). The liquidity effects associated with addition of a stock to the S&P 500 index: evidence from bid/ask spreads. The Financial Review, 33(1), 131-146.
- Eurosif. (2020). No Tit.
- Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capita Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
- Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2020). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 0(0), 1-7.
- Hanaeda, H., & Serita, T. (2003). Price and Volume Effects Associated with a Change in the Nikkei 225 Index List: New Evidence from the Big Change on April 2000. J. .J. Choi and T. Hiraki (Eds), The Japanese Finance: Corporate Finance and Capital Markets in Changing Japan (pp. 199-225). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Harris, L., & Gurel, E. (1986). Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: New evidence for the price pressures. The Journal of Finance, 41(4), 815-829.
- Hegde, S. P., & McDermott, J. B. (2003). The liquidity effects of revisions to the S&P 500 index: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Markets, 6(3), 413-459.
- López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285-300.
- Lynch, A. W., & Mendenhall, R. R. (1997). New Evidence on Stock Price Effects Associated with Changes in the S & P 500 Index New Evidence on Stock Price Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 Index. The Journal of Business, 70(3), 351-383.
- Masse, I., Hanrahan, R., Kushner, J., & Martinello, F. (2000). The Effect of Additions to or Deletions from the TSE 300 Index on Canadian Share Prices. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 33(2), 341-359.
- Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483-510.
- Opong, K. K., & Hamill, P. A. (2002). Spot Market Effects Surrounding Compositional Changes to the FTSE 100: Transitory or Permanent?
- Prem C. Jain. (1987). The Effect on Stock Price of Inclusion in or Exclusion from the S&P 500. Financial Analysts Journal, 43(1), 58-65.
- Qiu, M., & Pinfold, J. (2008). Price and trading volume reactions to index constitution changes: The Australian evidence. Managerial Finance, 34(1), 53-69.
- Robinson, M., Kleffner, A., & Bertels, S. (2011). Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 493-505.
- Selvam, M., Indhumathi, G., & Lydia, J. (2012). Impact on stock price by the inclusion to and exclusion from CNX nifty index. Global Business Review, 13(1), 39-50.
- Shleifer, A. (1986). Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down? The Journal of Finance, 41(3), 579-590.
- Torre, M. La, Mango, F., Cafaro, A., & Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability, 12(16), 1-12.
- Vijaya, M. B., & Vedpuriswar. (2003). The dynamics around Sensex reconstitutions. ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 9(4), 5-13.
- Wilkens, S., & Wimschulte, J. (2005). Price and Volume Effects Associated with 2003’s Major Reorganization of German Stock Indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 19(1), 61-98.