Presidential election polls and stock returns in Taiwan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(3).2022.12
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2022, Issue #3, pp. 139-152
- Cited by
- 395 Views
-
141 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper examines the impacts of 29 opinion polls from three prominent media sources on 825 firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange during the 2020 Taiwan presidential election campaign. In the election, the challenger Han adopted unprecedented election tactics of asking his supporters to mislead pollsters on their voting intentions, separating the sample polls published before and after the start of this election tactic into normal and chaotic periods. This study assumes that stock markets respond positively to the increased incumbent polling leads due to the reduced probability of future changes to economic policy only for the credible normal polls. A standard event study in a 3-day event window, one day before and after the event day, is employed to analyze the short polling effects on stock returns during the sample period. The estimation window is 120 days. The results indicate that market returns are positively associated with the changes in the incumbent’s lead only for the television’s normal polls, and markets react more strongly to decreased polling leads than to increased polling leads for television polls, as presumed by the uncertain information hypothesis. Analysis of the impact of polling during the chaotic period on investor sentiment indicates that the market has positive reactions to both positive and negative polling changes, suggesting the tactic creates confusion in the market. This paper concludes that markets may react differently to opinion polls depending on their source and candidates’ election tactics.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D72, G12, G14
-
References37
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlations
- Table 2. Cumulative abnormal returns for the TVBS polls
- Table 3. Cumulative abnormal returns for the Apple Daily polls
- Table 4. Cumulative abnormal returns for the Liberty Times polls
- Table 5. Cumulative abnormal returns for the TVBS polls by market size
- Table 6. Regressions analyses of cumulative abnormal returns for sample polls
- Table 7. Two alternative testing methods for CAR of the initial polls
- Table A1. Variable definitions
-
- Apple Daily. (n.d.). Politics. (In Chinese).
- Besalú, R., & Pont-Sorribes, C. (2021). Credibility of digital political news in Spain: Comparison between traditional media and social media. Social Science, 10(5), 1-18.
- Bialkowski, J., Gottschalk, K., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1941-1953.
- Brown, K. C., Harlow, W. V., & Tinic, S. M. (1988). Risk aversion, uncertain information, and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(2), 355-385.
- Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
- Chan, Y., & Wei, K. (1996). Political risk and stock price volatility: The case of Hong Kong. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 4(2-3), 259-275.
- Chen, Y., Cho, T., & Pai, S. (2017). The impact of presidential election on Taiwan’s stock market. Journal of Electoral Studies, 24(1), 33-60. (In Chinese).
- Child, T. B., Massoud, N., Schabus, M., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Surprise election for Trump connections. Journal of Financial Economics, 140(2), 676-697.
- Ejara, D. D., Nag, R., & Upadhyaya, K. P. (2012). Opinion polls and the stock market: evidence from the 2008 US presidential election. Applied Financial Economics, 22(6), 437-443.
- Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (2012). Markets vs. polls as election predictors: An historical assessment. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 532-539.
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540.
- Füss, R., & Bechtel, M. M. (2008). Partisan politics and stock market performance: The effect of expected government partisanship on stock returns in the 2002 German federal election. Public Choice, 135(3-4), 131-150.
- Gemmill, G. (1992). Political risk and market efficiency: tests based in British stock and option markets in the 1987 election. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(1), 211-231.
- Goodell, J. W., & Bodey, R. A. (2012). Price-earnings changes during US presidential election cycles: voter uncertainty and other determinants. Public Choice, 150(3-4), 633-650.
- Goodell, J. W., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). US presidential elections and implied volatility: The role of political uncertainty. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(3), 1108-1117.
- Goodell, J. W., McGee, R. J., & McGroarty, F. (2020). Election uncertainty, economic policy uncertainty and financial market uncertainty: a prediction market analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 110, 1-15.
- Gwilym, O. A., & Buckle, M. (1994). The efficiency of stock and options markets: tests based on 1992 UK election polls. Applied Financial Economics, 4(5), 345-354.
- Herold, M., Kanz, A., & Muck, M. (2021). Do opinion polls move stock prices?-Evidence from the US presidential election in 2016. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 665-690.
- Idid, S. A., Ahmed, I. S. Y., & Souket, R. (2017). Examining political efficacy among Malaysian voters: The role of traditional and new media. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 27(1), 43-64.
- Levy, T., & Yagil, J. (2015). The 2012 US presidential election polls and stock returns. Business and Economic Research, 5(2), 66-74.
- Li, J., & Born, J. A. (2006). Presidential election uncertainty and common stock returns in the United States. Journal of Financial Research, 29(4), 609-622.
- Liberty Times Net. (n.d.). Main Page. (In Chinese).
- Malley, J., Philippopoulos, A., & Woitek, U. (2007). Electoral uncertainty, fiscal policy and macroeconomic fluctuations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(3), 1051-1080.
- Mehdian, S., Nas, T., & Perry, M. J. (2008). An examination of investor reaction to unexpected political and economic events in Turkey. Global Finance Journal, 18(3), 337-350.
- Media Agency Association. (2019). Media Book. (In Chinese).
- Mehrabi, D., Hassan, M. B., & Ali, M. S. S. (2009). News Media Credibility of the Internet and Television. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 136-148.
- Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2021). Do opinion polls on government preference influence stock returns? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100493.
- Oehler, A., Walker, T. J., & Wendt, S. (2013). Effects of election results on stock price performance: evidence from 1980 to 2008. Managerial Finance, 39(8), 714-736.
- Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D. A., & Turtle, H. J. (2000). Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: The international evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(10), 1575-1604.
- Peterson, P. P. (1989). Event studies: A review of issues and methodology. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 28(5), 36-66.
- Santa-Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2003). The presidential puzzle: political cycles and the stock market. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1841-1872.
- Shon, J. J. (2010). Do stock returns vary with campaign contributions? Bush vs Gore: the Florida recount. Economics & Politics, 22(3), 257-281.
- Taiwan Media Watch Fund Foundation. (2019). A Study of Taiwan’s Media Credibility in 2019 (In Chinese).
- Thompson, R. S., & Ioannidis, C. (1987). The stock market response to voter opinion polls. Investment Analyst, 83, 19-22.
- TVBS. (n.d.). Poll Center. (In Chinese).
- Wagner, A. F., Zeckhauser, R. J., & Ziegler, A. (2018). Company stock price reactions to the 2016 election shock: Trump, taxes, and trade. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(2), 428-451.
- Welch, R. L. (2002). Polls, polls, and more polls: An evaluation of how public opinion polls are reported in newspapers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(1), 102-114.