Investor sentiment measurement based on technical analysis indicators affecting stock returns: Empirical evidence on VN100
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.25
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2021, Issue #4, pp. 297-308
- Cited by
- 578 Views
-
172 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment as measured by technical analysis indicators has an impact on stock returns. The research period is from 2015 to mid-2020. 1-year government bond yields, financial data, transaction data of 57 companies in the VN100 basket, and VNIndex are analyzed. The investor sentiment variable is measured by each technical analysis indicator (Relative Strength Index – RSI, Psychological Line Index – PLI), and the general sentiment variable is established based on extracting the principal component from individual indicators. The paper uses two regression methods – Fama-MacBeth and Generalized Least Square (GLS) – for five different research models. The results show that sentiment plays an important role in stock returns in the Vietnamese stock market. Even controlling the factors such as cash flow per share, firm size, market risk premium, and stock price volatility in the studied models, the impact of sentiment is significant in both the model using individual technical indicators and the model using the general sentiment variable. Furthermore, investor sentiment has a stronger power to explain excess stock returns than their trading behavior. The implication from the results shows that the Vietnamese stock market is inefficient, in which psychology is a very important issue and participants need to pay due attention to this factor.
Acknowledgment
This study was funded by the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City (IUH), Vietnam (grant number: 21/1TCNH03).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G12, G14, G17, G41
-
References34
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Correlation results between pairs of variables
- Table 3. Principal component analysis
- Table 4. Regression results according to the Fama-MacBeth method
- Table 5. Regression results according to GLS
-
- Anderson, B., & Li, S. (2015). An investigation of the relative strength index. Banks and Bank Systems, 10(1), 92-96.
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
- Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77-85.
- Bhargavi, R., Gumparthi, S., & Anith, R. (2017). Relative strength index for developing effective trading strategies in constructing optimal portfolio. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(19), 8926-8936.
- Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105.
- Fama, E. F. (2021). Efficient capital markets a review of theory and empirical work. In The Fama Portfolio (pp. 76-121). The University of Chicago Press.
- FiinPro. (n.d.). Main Page.
- Hair, J. F., Black, B., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
- Hsu, C. M. (2011). A hybrid procedure for stock price prediction by integrating self-organizing map and genetic programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14026-14036.
- Irwin, S. H., & Brorsen, B. W. (1987). A note on the factors affecting technical trading system returns. Journal of Futures Markets, 7(5), 591-595.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. N. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
- Kim, T., & Ha, A. (2010). Investor sentiment and market anomalies. 23rd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference.
- Kumar, A., & Lee, C. M. (2006). Retail investor sentiment and return comovements. The Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2451-2486.
- Li, J. (2021). The term structure effects of individual stock investor sentiment on excess returns. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1695-1705.
- Mizuno, H., Kosaka, M., Yajima, H., & Komoda, N. (1998). Application of neural network to technical analysis of stock market prediction. Studies in Informatic and Сontrol, 7(3), 111-120.
- Park, C. H., & Irwin, S. (2004). The profitability of technical analysis: a review (AgMAS Project Research Reports 2004-04). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- Pearson, K. (1896). VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. – III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, containing papers of a mathematical or physical character, 187, 253-318.
- Pearson, K., & Filon, L. N. G. (1898). VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—IV. On the probable errors of frequency constants and on the influence of random selection on variation and correlation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 191, 229-311.
- Phuong, L. C. M. (2020). Investor sentiment by psychological line index and stock return. Accounting, 6(7), 1259-1264.
- Phuong, L. C. M. (2021a). Investor sentiment by relative strength index and stock return: Empirical evidence on Vietnam’s stock market. Accounting, 7(2), 451-456.
- Phuong, L. C. M. (2021b). Investor Sentiment by Money Flow Index and Stock Return. International Journal of Financial Research, 12(4), 33-42.
- Pring, M. J. (1985). Technical Analysis Explained. McGraw-Hill.
- Ryu, D., Kim, H., & Yang, H. (2017). Investor sentiment, trading behavior and stock returns. Applied Economics Letters, 24(12), 826-830.
- Schulmeister, S. (2009). Profitability of technical stock trading: Has it moved from daily to intraday data? Review of Financial Economics, 18(4), 190-201.
- Seok, S. I., Cho, H., & Ryu, D. (2019). Firm-specific investor sentiment and daily stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 50, 100857.
- Shiller, R. J. (1981). Alternative tests of rational expectations models: The case of the term structure. Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 71-87.
- Shiller, R. J. (1983). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? Reply. American Economic Review, 73(1), 236-237.
- Ţăran-Moroşan, A. (2011). The relative strength index revisited. African Journal of Business Management, 5(14), 5855-5862.
- The Nobel Prize. (2002). The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002.
- Wilder, J. W. (1978). New concepts in technical trading systems. Trend Research.
- Wong, W. K., Manzur, M., & Chew, B. K. (2003). How rewarding is technical analysis? Evidence from Singapore stock market. Applied Financial Economics, 13(7), 543-551.
- Working, H. (1949). The investigation of economic expectations. The American Economic Review, 39(3), 150-166.
- Working, H. (1961). New concepts concerning futures markets and prices. The American Economic Review, 51(2), 160-163.