Equity market anomalies in major European economies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.20
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2021, Issue #2, pp. 245-260
- Cited by
- 935 Views
-
410 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper investigates five leading equity market anomalies – size, value, momentum, profitability, and asset growth, for four Western European markets, namely, Germany, France, Italy and Spain, from January 2002 to March 2018. The study tests whether these anomalies reverse under different macro-economic uncertainty conditions, and evaluates if strategies based on time diversification can be formed using these equity market anomalies. Market anomalies were tested using four major asset pricing models – the Capital Asset Pricing Model, the Fama-French three-factor model, the Carhart model, and the Fama-French five-factor model. Macro-economic uncertainty was tested using two proxies, namely VIX and default premiums. Time diversified strategies were examined by estimating Sharpe ratios of combined portfolios formed by combining winner univariate portfolios. Value effect in Germany, Size effect in France and Profitability effect in Italy and Spain provide the highest unadjusted returns on long side strategies. No significant reversal of these anomalies was found under different macroeconomic uncertainties. Asset pricing tests show that CAPM works well for Spain and Italy, while Carhart’s model explains returns in Germany. The Fama-French five factor model does not seem to be a good descriptor of asset pricing for data. No suitable model for explaining asset returns is identified for France. Finally, it is observed that some of the equity market anomalies seem to be countercyclical and therefore provide time diversification opportunities. The study has implications for academicians, investors, and policy makers by providing insights for developing profitable investment strategies and highlighting the efficacy of alternative models as performance benchmarks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C13, C22, G11
-
References38
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Mean unadjusted returns for attribute sorted portfolios
- Table 2. CAPM results
- Table 3. Fama-French three-factor model
- Table 4. Carhart model results
- Table 5. Fama-French five-factor model results
- Table 6. Comparison of the performance of univariate and bivariate strategy winners
- Table 7. Asset pricing tests for bivariate strategies
-
- Alhenawi, Y. (2015). On the Interaction between Momentum Effect and Size Effect. Review of Financial Economics, 26(C), 36-46.
- Asness, C., Frazzini, A., Israel, R., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Size Matters, if You Control Your Junk. Journal of Financial Economics, 129, 479-509.
- Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
- Barroso, P., & Santa-Clara, P. (2015). Momentum Has its Moments. Journal of Financial Economics 116(1), 111-120.
- Blitz, D., Hanauer, M. X., & Vidojevic, M. (2018). The Idiosyncratic Momentum Anomaly. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 932-957.
- Cakici, N., Fabozzi, F. J., & Tan, S. (2013). Size, Value, and Momentum in Emerging Market Stock Returns. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 46-65.
- Cao, Viet Nga, Philip Gray, & Angel Zhong. (2018). Investment-related anomalies in Australia: Evidence and explanations. International Review of Financial Analysis, 61, 97-109.
- Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
- Chan, K. C., & Chen, Nai-Fu. (1991). Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms. The Journal of Finance, 46, 1739-1789.
- Cooper, M., Gulen, H., & Schill, M. (2008). Asset growth and the cross section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 63, 1609-1651.
- Copeland, M., & Copeland, T. (2016). VIX versus Size. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 42(3), 76-83.
- Daniel, K., & Moskowitz, T. J. (2016). Momentum crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 122, 221-247.
- Denis, D., Jarno, T. & Aijo, J. (2016). Magic Formula VS. Traditional Value Investment Strategies in the Finnish Stock Market. NJB, 65(3), 38-54.
- Elliot, B., Docherty, P., Easton, S., & Lee, D. (2018). Profitability and investment-based factor pricing models. Accounting and Finance, 58, 397-421.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-65.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor interpretations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463.
- Fama, E., & French, K. (2006). Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. Review of Financial Studies, 29, 70-103.
- Foye, J. (2018). A comprehensive test of the Fama-French five factor model in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 37(C), 199-222.
- Haugen, R. A., & Nardin, L. Baker. (1996). Commonality in the determinants of expected stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 401-439.
- Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications of stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
- Klaus, G., & Topi, H. (2019). Combining value and momentum: evidence from the Nordic equity market. Applied Economics, 51(26), 2872-2884.
- Linnainmaa, J. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2018). The History of the Cross Section of Stock Returns. Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), 2606-2649.
- Novy-Marx, R. (2012). Is momentum really momentum? Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3), 429-453.
- Novy-Marx, R., & Velikov, M. (2015). A taxonomy of anomalies and their trading costs. Review of Financial Studies, 29(1), 104-147.
- Pandey, A. (2020). Equity Market Anomalies, VIX and Asset Pricing: Trading Strategies for India. Indian Economic Journal.
- Pandey, A., & Sehgal, S. (2016). Explaining Size Effect for Indian Stock. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 23, 45-68.
- Papanastasopoulos, G. A. (2017). Asset growth anomaly in Europe: Do profits and losses matter? Economics Letters, 156, 106-109.
- Pukthuanthong, K., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2019). A protocol for factor identification. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(4), 1573-1607.
- Rouwenhorst, K. (1998). International momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 53, 267-84.
- Schiereck, D., De Bondt, W., & Weber, M. (1999). Contrarian and Momentum Strategies in Germany. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 104-116.
- Sehgal, S., Jain, S., & Morandiere, L. (2012). Short-term prior return patterns in stocks and sector returns: Evidence for BRICKS markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9(1), 93-114.
- Sehgal, S., Gupta, P., & Deisting, F. (2017). Assessing time-varying stock market integration in Economic and Monetary Union for normal and crisis periods. The European Journal of Finance, 23(11), 1025-1058.
- Sharpe, William F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
- Stattman, D. (1980). Book values and stock returns. The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers, 4, 25-45.
- Zaremba, A. (2018). The momentum effect in country-level stock market anomalies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 703-721.
- Zaremba, A., & Czapkiewicz, A. (2017). Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: A comparison of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Review, 31, 1-15.