Wealth creation through corporate diversification – the bondholders’ perspective
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.09
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #4, pp. 94-101
- 742 Views
-
121 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The influence of corporate diversification on firm value is an important field in strategy research. Studies in strategic management and finance research have analyzed value creation through product and geographic diversification from a shareholder’s perspective. This study completes this picture by analyzing the bondholders’ perspective. It is suggested that product diversification creates value for bondholders, while geographic diversification destroys bondholder value. The hypotheses are tested on a sample of S&P 1,200 firms in 2001–2011 using a fixed-effects panel model. Drawing on prior research, bondholder value creation is measured using the Merton model. The empirical results support the hypothesis that bondholders gain value through product diversification but lose value through geographic diversification. Considering prior research results, these results show that product diversification is preferable for bondholders, while geographic diversification is preferable from a shareholder’s perspective. The opposite effects of both diversification strategies on shareholders, respectively, bondholders offer an important new perspective on corporate diversification. The results show that firms with a high level of corporate debt should struggle to justify a strategy involving geographic dispersion of activities and support a more diversified product portfolio strategy. This study also offers several avenues for investigating the bondholder’s perspective on corporate diversification in more detail.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L30, G32
-
References29
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlations
- Table 2. Regression results from fixed and random effects regression models
- Table 3. Regression results from fixed- and random-effects regression models including firms with primary SIC Codes between 6000 and 6999
-
- Amit, R., & Livnat, J. (1989). Efficient Corporate Diversification: Methods and Implications. Management Science, 35(7), 879-897.
- Benner, M. J., & Ranganathan, R. (2012). Offsetting illegitimacy? How pressures from securities analysts influence incumbents in the face of new technologies. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 213-233.
- Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39-65.
- Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1999). Causes and effects of corporate refocusing programs. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 311-345.
- Bettis, R. A., & Mahajan, V. (1985). Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Management Science, 31(7), 785-799.
- Capps, C., Dranove, D., & Satterthwaite, M. (2003). Competition and market power in option demand markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(4), 737-763.
- Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management, 30(4), 509-528.
- Chatterjee, S., & Lubatkin, M. (1990). Corporate mergers, stockholder diversification, and changes in systematic risk. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 255-268.
- Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1951-1979.
- Drucker, S., & Puri, M. (2005). On the benefits of concurrent lending and underwriting. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2763-2799.
- Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2012). Universal banks and corporate control: Evidence from the global syndicated loan market. Review of Financial Studies, 25(9), 2703-2744.
- Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & DaCosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109-119.
- Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51-80.
- Glaser, M., & Müller, S. (2010). Is the diversification discount caused by the book value bias of debt? Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2307-2317.
- Grant, R. M. (1987). Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), 79-89.
- Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (1994). A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20(2), 297-326.
- Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.
- Kim, C. W., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1993). Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4), 275-286.
- Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Science, 40(1), 123-139.
- Lu, J., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598-609.
- Lubatkin, M., & Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply? Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 109-136.
- Lubatkin, M., & Rogers, R. C. (1989). Diversification, systematic risk, and shareholder return: A capital market extension of Rumelt’s 1974 study. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 454-465.
- Mammen, J., Alessandri, T., & Weiss, M. (2019). The risk implication of diversification: Integrating the effects of product and geographic diversification. Long Range Planning.
- Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2002). Corporate diversification: What gets discounted? Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2167-2183.
- Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449-470.
- Miller, K. D., & Reuer, J. J. (1998). Asymmetric corporate exposures to foreign exchange rate changes. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1183-1191.
- Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155-174.
- Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179-196.
- Vassalou, M., & Xing, Y. (2004). Default risk in equity returns. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 831-868.
