Corporate hedging theories and usage of foreign currency loans: a logit model approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.31
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #4, pp. 367-377
- Cited by
- 696 Views
-
527 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The present study has attempted to discuss the association between corporate hedging theories and the usage of foreign currency loans by companies listed in India. A total of 349 non-financial companies were selected, and the data for the financial year ending 31st March, 2018 were considered for the analysis. The descriptive statistics indicate that 55% of the sample companies had borrowed funds in foreign currency. The companies were highly levered and maintained adequate short-term assets to honor short-term obligations. A logit model was employed for analyzing the cross-sectional data. The dependent variable being binary (‘0’ for non-user of foreign currency loans and ‘1’ for foreign currency loan user), the study found the variable ‘industry type’ to have a significant association with usage of foreign currency loans. Companies from the manufacturing sector were likely to use foreign currency loans than companies from the services sector. Debt to net worth, export to sales, revenue (log of revenue) were the variables that significantly influenced the likelihood of companies raising foreign currency loans. Interest coverage ratio had a negative influence on the likelihood of companies opting for foreign currency loans. Hosmer and Lemeshow test showed that the model is a good fit indicating 73% accuracy in predicting the users of foreign currency loans as ‘foreign currency loan users’. Theories such as financial distress, size, and extent of international operations explain why companies raise foreign currency loans.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, G39, G30
-
References32
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. No. of companies with/without foreign currency loans
- Figure 2. Classification of companies - industry type
-
- Table 1. Variables for the study
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Results of univariate analysis (difference between means of users vs. non-users of foreign currency loans)
- Table 4. Number of companies with/without foreign currency loans
- Table 5. Classification of companies – industry type
- Table 6. Results of logistic regression
- Table 7. Confusion matrix and statistics
-
- Aabo, T. (2006). The importance of corporate foreign debt as an alternative to currency derivatives in actual management of exchange rate exposures. European Financial Management, 12(4), 633-649.
- Afza, T., & Alam, A. (2011). Determinants of corporate hedging policies: A case of foreign exchange and interest rate derivative usage. African Journal of Business Management, 5(14), 572-579.
- Allayannis, G., & Ofek, E. (2001). Exchange rate exposure, hedging, and the use of foreign currency derivatives. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 273-296.
- Bessembinder, H. (1991). Forward contracts and firm value: Investment incentive and contracting effects. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (December), 519-532.
- Bradley, K., & Moles, P. (2002). Managing strategic exchange rate exposures: evidence from UK firms. Managerial Finance, 28(11), 28-42.
- Charumathi, B., & Kota, H. B. (2012). On the Determinants of Derivative Usage by Large Indian Non-financial Firms. Global Business Review, 13(2), 251-267.
- Clark, E., & Judge, A. P. (2008). The Determinants of Foreign Currency Hedging: Does Foreign Currency Debt Induce a Bias? European Financial Management, 14(3), 445-469.
- Dunne, T. M., Helliar, C., Power, D., Mallin, C. A., Ow-Yong, K. H., & Moir, L. (2004). The introduction of Derivatives Reporting in the UK: A Content Analysis of FRS13 Disclosures. Journal of Derivatives Accounting, 1(2), 205-219.
- El-Masry, A., Abdel-Salam, O., & Alatraby, A. (2007). The Exchange rate exposure of U.K. nonfinancial companies. Managerial Finance, 33(9), 620-641.
- Froot, K., Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. (1993). Risk Management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance, 48, 1629-1658.
- Graham, J. R., & Rogers, D. A. (2002). Do Firms hedge in response to tax incentives? Journal of Finance, 57(2), 815-839.
- Haushalter, G. D. (2000). Financing policy, basis risk, and corporate hedging: Evidence from oil and gas producers. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 107-151.
- Jalilvand, A. (1999). Why firms use derivatives: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(3), 213-228.
- Keloharju, M., & Niskanen, M. (2001). Why do firms raise foreign currency denominated debt? Evidence from Finland. European Financial Management, 7, 481-496.
- Khan, N., Ali, K., Kiran, A., Mubeen, R., Khan, Z. N., & Ali, N. (2017). Factors that Affect the Derivatives Usage of Non-Financial Listed Firms of Pakistan to Hedge Foreign Exchange Exposure.
- Linsley, M. P., & Shrives, J. P. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosures in the annual report of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(4), 387-404.
- Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. Jr. (1982). On the corporate demand for insurance. Journal of Business, 55(2), 281-296.
- Mitra, A. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Foreign Exchange Risk Management Practices among Non Banking Companies in India. Africa Development and Resources Research Institute (ADRRI) Journal, 3(3), 38-51.
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.
- Muff, T., Diacon, S., & Woods, M. (2008). The Management of Currency Risk: Evidence from UK Company Disclosures (Discussion Paper Series). Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies, Nottingham University Business School.
- Naghai, M., Nagahisarchoghaei, M., Solieman, N., & Raed, J. M. (2018). Hedging Strategies of Corporate Houses. Journal of Business Administration Research, 7(1), 6-19.
- Nance, D. R., Smith, C. W., & Smithson, C. W. (1993). On the determinants of corporate hedging. Journal of Finance, (March), 267-284.
- Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2003). Can the use of foreign currency derivatives explain variations in foreign exchange exposure? Evidence from Australian Companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 13(3), 193-215.
- Omar, B., Abdullah, Nisham Kamarun, & Mohammad Taufil (2017). Exposure of foreign Exchange risk- A Review of Empirical Evidences. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 2(5), 79-91.
- Pennings, J. M. (2002). Pulling the Trigger or Not: Factors Affecting Behavior of Initiating a Position in Derivatives Markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(2), 263-278.
- Raghavendra, R. H., & Velmurugan, P. S. (2014). The Determinants of Currency Hedging in Retrieved from Indian IT Firms. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 3, 125-134.
- Smith, C. W., & Stulz, R. M. (1985). The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (December), 391-405.
- Tufano, P. (1996). Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the gold mining industry. The Journal of Finance, 51, 1097-1137.
- Velasco, L. G. (2014). Factors Influencing derivatives usage of Companies in Philippines. Philippine Management Review, 21(1), 1-12.
- Vivel Búa, M., Otero González, L., & Fernandez Lopez, S. (2009). Corporate Hedging Theories and Foreign Currency Debt: A Review of the Evidence.
- Vural-Yavas, C. (2016). Determinants of Corporate Hedging-Evidence from Emerging Markets. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(12), 151-162.
- Whidbee, A. D., & Wohar, M. (1999). Derivative activities and managerial incentives in the banking industry. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 251-276.