Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.13
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #3, pp. 160-174
- Cited by
- 694 Views
-
449 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Ukraine’s European integration requires the involvement of seaports in the international TEN-T network, so it is extremely important to create favorable investment conditions to develop port infrastructure. This study aims to make a comprehensive assessment of the seaports’ investment attractiveness to use it for increasing the efficiency of attracting investment in the development of Ukrainian seaports, which are part of the European transport network. The study was conducted using the Saati method and the method of calculating the integrated indicator of seaports’ investment attractiveness. The integrated indicator includes assessing indicators of business activity in the region and consolidated indicators of financial and property status, logistical attractiveness, and prospects for port development. According to the results of calculations, the seaports of Ukraine were divided into three groups. The ports of Yuzhne, Odesa, Illichivsk, and Mykolaiv have a high level of investment attractiveness. The ratio of investment attractiveness ranges from 3 to 2.6. The ports of Izmail, Mariupol, Oktyabrsk, and Kherson have an average level (ratio from 2.2 to 1), and other ports have a low investment attractiveness (coefficient from 0.9 to 0.7).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L91, R42
-
References28
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Structural and logical scheme for determining the integral indicator of the seaport investment attractiveness
-
- Table 1. Scale of converting the component’s values of the general indicator of the property status into points
- Table 2. Scale of converting the indicator components of the port’s liquidity and solvency into points
- Table 3. Scale of converting the indicators of the port’s business activity and profitability into points
- Table 4. The scale of converting the components of the port’s production indicator in points
- Table 5. Indicators of logistical attractiveness of Ukrainian seaports
- Table 6. Indicators of the development prospects of Ukrainian seaports
- Table 7. Determining the comparative indicator of business activity in the region
- Table 8. Ratio scale of the seaport investment attractiveness
-
- Aerts, G., Grage, T., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Public-Private Partnerships for the Provision of Port Infrastructure: An Explorative Multi-Actor Perspective on Critical Success Factors. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(3), 274-298.
- Asaul, A. (2004). Sistematizatsiya faktorov, kharakterizuyushchikh investitsionnuyu privlekatelnost regionov [Systematization of factors characterizing the investment attractiveness of regions]. Regional Economy, 2, 53-62. (In Russian).
- Banister, D., & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 209-218.
- Bendall, H. B., & Stent, A. F. (2007). Maritime investment strategies with a portfolio of real options. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5), 441-452.
- Deng, T. (2013). Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Productivity and Economic Growth. Recent Advances and Research Challenges Transport Reviews, 33(6), 686-699.
- Evans, J. J. (1984). Some practical aspects of investment appraisal in shipping. Maritime Policy and Management, 11(3), 197-222.
- Garcia-Alonso, L., & Martin-Bofarull, M. (2007). Impact of port investment on efficiency and capacity to attract traffic in Spain: Bilbao versus Valencia. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9(3), 254-267.
- Hawkins, J. E. (1991). Port investment appraisals for the 1990s. Maritime Policy and Management, 18(3), 225-232.
- Hlali, A., & Hammami, S. (2017). Seaport Concept and Services Characteristics: Theoretical Test. The Open Transportation Journal, 11, 120-129.
- Jouili, T. A., & Allouche, M. A. (2016). Impacts of Seaport Investment on Economic Growth. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 28(4), 365-370.
- Karpenko, O., Palyvoda, O., & Bondarenko, O. (2018). Simulation modelling of strategic development of transport and logistics clusters in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 93-98.
- Kharlamova, G. (2014). Investment attractiveness of Ukrainian regions: rating assessment and marketing promotion Journal of International Studies, 7(1), 9-26.
- Kolesnik, I. M. (2016). Osoblyvosti rozvytku morskykh portiv Ukrainy na zasadakh derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva [Features of development of seaports of Ukraine based on public-private partnership]. Economics and Organization of Management, 4(24), 201-208. (In Ukrainian).
- Lagoudis, I. N., Rice, J. B., & Salminen, J. B. (2014). Port Investment Strategies under Uncertainty: The Case of a Southeast Asian Multipurpose Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(3), 299-319.
- Law of Ukraine “On seaports of Ukraine”.
- Lee, P. T., & Lam, J. S. (2013). Fifth generation ports? Competitiveness analysis on major Asian ports. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Port Economics. Singapore.
- Makashyna, E. V. (2010). Sravnitelnyy analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya morskikh portov v raznykh stranakh [Comparative analysis of the current state of seaports in different countries]. Management in Russia and Abroad, 2.
- Munnell, A. H. (1992). Policy Watch: Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(4), 189-198.
- Oblak, R. A., & Bistričić, A. (2013). Jugović: Public-private partnership – management model of Croatian seaports. Management, 18(1), 79-102.
- Palyvoda, O. M., & Karpenko, O. O. (2017). Mechanism of providing economic development of transport and logistics enterprises on the basis of clustering. Scientific Bulletin of Polissya, 4(14), 33-39.
- Rodrigue, J-P., Notteboom, Е., & Pallis, A. A. (2011). The Financialisation of the Terminal and Port Industry: Revisiting Risk and Embeddedness. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(2), 191-213.
- Saati, T. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy [Decision making] (278 p.). Moscow: Radio and communication. (In Russian).
- Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. World Economic Forum.
- Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (Ed.) (2007). Velykyi entsyklopedychnyi yurydychnyi slovnyk [Large encyclopedic legal dictionary for order (992 p.). Кyiv: Legal opinion. (In Ukrainian).
- Tymoshchuk, O. M., & Melnyk, O. M. (2013). Formuvannia mekhanizmu realizatsii lohistychnoi stratehii richkovykh portiv [Formation of the mechanism for the implementation of the logistic strategy of fish ports]. Actual problems of the economy, 3, 146-155. (In Ukrainian).
- Van Ham, Н., & Koppenjan, J. Building. (2001). Public Private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development. Public Management Review, 3(4), 593-616.
- Vigarié, A. (2004). La manutention des conteneurs dans le delta du Rhin, des enjeux européens? Transport, 425, 149-157.
- Vlasova, V. P. (2013). Suchasni naukovi pidkhody shchodo definitsii “morskyi port” [Modern scientific approaches to the definition of a seaport]. Water transport – Vodnyi transport, 3(18), 115-119. (In Ukrainian).