Application of an intangible asset valuation model using panel data for listed enterprises in Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.26
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #1, pp. 304-316
- Cited by
- 1287 Views
-
590 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Intangible assets play an important role in increasing the value of companies. The performance of companies increasingly depends on ideas, information, and professional services rather than tangible assets. The question of how to accurately measure intangible assets remains a challenge for many scientists. This study aims to measure intangible assets of 396 companies listed on Vietnam’s stock market between 2010 and 2014 using the panel data technique by Yamayuchi (2014). The estimation shows that intangible assets make up a large share of total assets of companies. In addition, construction, steel, building materials, mining, and food are sectors with high intangible assets in Vietnam. The study also finds a positive impact of intangible assets on improving company performance. The findings demonstrate the importance of investing in intangible assets, such as R&D, technology, advertising, and human resources, to increase the value of a company in the future.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G31, M21, O30
-
References51
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Description of variables used in the model
- Table 2. Regression results of equation (6) by using fixed and random effect models
- Table 3. Top 10 industries in Vietnam wwith highest intangible assets in 2014
- Table 4. Top 10 Vietnamese firms by intangible asset value, 2014
- Table 5. The impact of intangible assets on a firm’s value added
- Table 6. The impact of intangible assets on EBIT
- Table 7. The impact of intangible assets on stock prices
-
- Bae, S. C., & Kim, D. (2003). The effect of R&D investments on market value of firms: Evidence from the US, Germany, and Japan. Multinational Business Review.
- Banker, R. D., Huang, R., Natarajan, R., & Zhao, S. (2019). Market Valuation of Intangible Asset: Evidence on SG&A Expenditure. The Accounting Review, 94(6), 61-90.
- Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Bhatia, A., & Aggarwal, K. (2018). Impact of investment in intangible assets on corporate performance in India. International Journal of Law and Management.
- Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (1998). Research and development, Intangible Assets and the performance of Large Australian Companies. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
- Boujelben, S., & Fedhila, H. (2011). The effects of intangible investments on future OCF. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 480-494.
- Chen, T. C., Guo, D. Q., Chen, H. M., & Wei, T. T. (2019). Effects of R&D intensity on firm performance in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 2377-2392.
- Cobb, W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. The American Economic Review, 18(1), 139-165.
- Darabi, R., & Vojohi, V. (2013). The survey of the conservative relationship between the intangible assets and management performance ratio. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(3), 749-757.
- Duqi, A., & Torluccio, G. (2011). Can R&D expenditures affect firm market value? An empirical analysis of a panel of European listed firms. In Bank Performance, Risk and Firm Financing (pp. 215-241). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
- Ehie, I. C., & Olibe, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 127-135.
- Fuss, M. A., & McFadden, D. (1978). Production economics: A dual approach to theory and applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
- Gupta, K., Banerjee, R., & Onur, I. (2017). The effects of R&D and competition on firm value: International evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 51, 391-404.
- IAS 38 Basis for Conclusion. (1997). Exposure draft 60, Intangible Assets, International Accounting Standards Committee.
- Ifeanyi, N., & Caroline, O. (2016). Evaluating the Effect of Intangible Assets on Economic Value added of Selected Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 8, 15.
- Itami, H., (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Jhunjhunwala, S., & Mishra, R. K. (2009). Corporate governance and corporate performance. International Journal of Business Research, 9(2), 62-67.
- Kamal, S. (2011). Entry mode and subsidiary performance in emerging economies. Mustang Journal of Business and Ethics, 2(1), 20-29.
- Kamasak, R. (2017). The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics.
- Kim, W. S., Park, K., Lee, S. H., & Kim, H. (2018). R&D Investments and Firm Value: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(11), 4133.
- Kundu, A., Kulkarni, P., & NK, A. M. (2010). Advertising and firm value: mapping the relationship between advertising, profitability and business strategy in India. Changing Ideas in Strategy (Ed. Arun Sinha), Narosa Publishing.
- Lev, B., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2003). The measurement of firm-specific organization capital (No. w9581). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138.
- Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
- Maysami, R. C., & Koh, T. S. (2000). A vector error correction model of the Singapore stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 9(1), 79-96.
- Min, B. S., & Smyth, R. (2016). How does leverage affect R&D intensity and how does R&D intensity impact on firm value in South Korea? Applied Economics, 48(58), 5667-5675.
- Motohashi, K. (2005). Firm level analysis of information network use and productivity in Japan.
- Nagaoka, S. (2006). R&D and market value of Japanese firms in the 1990s. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20(2), 155-176.
- OECD. (2008). Intellectual Assets and Value Creation: Synthesis Report.
- OECD. (2011). New sources of growth: intangible assets. Washington DC: OECD.
- Osinski, M., Selig, P. M., Matos, F., & Roman, D. J. (2017). Methods of evaluation of intangible assets and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 470-485.
- Pal, K., & Soriya, S. (2012). IC performance of Indian pharmaceutical and textile industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
- Pastor, D., Glova, J., Liptak, F., & Kovac, V. (2017). Intangibles and methods for their valuation in financial terms: Literature review. Intangible Capital, 13(2), 387-410.
- Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95-117.
- Ramirez, P. G., & Hachiya, T. (2006). Measuring firm-specific organizational capital and its impact on value and productivity: Evidence from Japan. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 9(04), 549-574.
- Rao, J., Yu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2013). The effect that R&D has on company performance: comparative analysis based on listed companies of technique intensive industry in China and Japan. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1-8.
- Reilly, R. F., & Schweis, R. P. (1999). Valuing intangible assets. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Ruiwen, Z., & Honghui, G. (2010). An Empirical Test of the Impact of Intangible Assets on Enterprise Performance of Chinese Social Services Listed Companies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation & Management (pp. 1373-1377).
- Sadowski, D., & Ludewig, O. (2003). Organisational capital: The power of an economic metaphor; organisational capital in German establishments (No. 2003/02). IAAEG Discussion Paper Series.
- Salamudin, N., Bakar, R., Ibrahim, M. K., & Hassan, F. H. (2010). Intangible assets valuation in the Malaysian capital market. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
- Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Shah, S. Z. A., Mirza, H. H., & Abbas, Q. (2011). Advertising Effects on Firm Performance. In Proceedings of the 3rd SAICON: International Conference on Management, Business Ethics and Economics, SAICON.
- Su, W. H., & Wells, P. (2015). The association of identifiable intangible assets acquired and recognized in business acquisitions with postacquisition firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), 1171-1199.
- Sveiby, K. E. (2010). Methods for measuring intangible assets.
- Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible resources, Tobin’s Q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 205-230.
- Vithessonthi, C., & Racela, O. C. (2016). Short-and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34, 28-45.
- Wang, M. (2011). Measuring intellectual capital and its effect on financial performance: Evidence from the capital market in Taiwan. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(2), 243-265.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
- Widiantoro, D. M. (2012). Measuring the Impact of Intangible Asset Investment toward Company Financial Health and Company Agency Problem: Empirical Research from Indonesian Companies during World Economic Financial Crisis 2006–2011. Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 1(2).
- Yamaguchi, T. (2014). Intangible asset valuation model using panel data. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 21(2), 175-191.