Does rapid market growth enhance efficiency? An evaluation of the Chinese mutual fund market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.32
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #2, pp. 383-394
- Cited by
- 813 Views
-
144 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In recent years, China’s mutual fund market has grown exponentially. With hundreds of new funds introduced into the market each year, an essential question to ask is whether this voluminous growth promotes funds’ efficiency, as funds compete for investment. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional portfolio performance metrics, this study utilizes a non-parametric model, data envelopment analysis (DEA), to assess the relative efficiency of equity and hybrid funds for 2016–2018. The empirical results show that despite the development in the fund industry, only a small portion of the funds are fully efficient. While efficiency improvement is observed in equity funds, the efficiency in hybrid funds actually deteriorates. On average, equity funds are more efficient and persistent in performance than hybrid funds. The empirical results also indicate that the primary areas of inefficiency are downside risk management and fund fee structures. For hybrid funds, fund size is also related to efficiency performance. The findings of this study offer implications for how to strengthen the development and stability of the Chinese mutual fund market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C14, G11, G14, G15
-
References29
-
Tables5
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Number of open-end funds in the Chinese mutual fund industry
- Figure 2. Total net assets (USD million)
- Figure 3. Number of open-end funds by type in the Chinese mutual fund industry
- Figure 4. The proportion of assets under management by type in the Chinese mutual fund industry
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of Chinese equity and hybrid funds for 2016–2018
- Table 2. Summary of the efficiency scores of equity and hybrid funds
- Table 3. Summary of funds’ persistent efficiency
- Table 4. Mean slacks in the inputs for Chinese equity and hybrid funds
- Table 5. Results from the censored Tobit regression
-
- Alexakis, P., & Tsolas, I. (2011). Appraisal of mutual equity fund performance using data envelopment analysis. Multinational Finance Journal, 15(3/4), 273-296.
- Babalos, V., Caporale, G. M., & Philippas, N. (2012). Efficiency evaluation of Greek equity funds. Research in International Business and Finance, 26(2), 317-333.
- Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. (1986). The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 32(12), 1613-1627.
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
- Basso, A. & Funari, S. (2016). DEA performance assessment of mutual funds. In J. Zhu (Ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis: A handbook of empirical studies and applications. Springer, New York.
- Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2001). A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(3), 477-492.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C., & Rousseau, J. (1984). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 2(1), 139-156.
- Chaw, C. (2017). China Mutual Funds 2017. China Knowledge Press Pte Ltd.
- Chen, Y. C., Chiu, Y. H., & Li, M. C. (2011). Mutual fund performance evaluation – Application of system BCC model. South African Journal of Economics, 79(1), 1-16.
- Chen, Z., & Lin, R. (2006). Mutual fund performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis with new risk measures. OR Spectrum, 28(3), 375-398.
- Choi, Y., & Murthi, B. (2001). Relative performance evaluation of mutual funds: A non‐parametric approach. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(7‐8), 853-876.
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., & Zhu, J. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, New York.
- Galagedera, D. U. A., & Silvapulle, P. (2002). Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 60-73.
- Galagedera, D. U. A., Roshdi, I., Fukuyama, H., & Zhu, J. (2018). A new network DEA model for mutual fund performance appraisal: An application to U.S. equity mutual funds. Omega, 77, 168-179.
- Galagedera, D. U. A., Watson, J., Premachandra, I. M., & Chen, Y. (2016). Modeling leakage in two-stage DEA models: An application to US mutual fund families. Omega, 61, 62-77.
- Gardijan, M., & Krišto, J. (2017). Efficiency of mutual funds in Croatia: A DEA-based approach applied in the pre-crisis, crisis and post crisis period. Croatian Operational Research Review, 8(1), 77-92.
- Jensen, M. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.
- Li, N., & Lin, C. (2011). Understanding emerging market equity mutual funds: The case of China. Financial Services Review, 20(1), 1-19.
- Makni, R., Benouda, O., & Delhoumi, E. (2015). Large scale analysis of Islamic equity funds using a meta-frontier approach with data envelopment analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 324-337.
- Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K., & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 408-418.
- Premachandra, I. M., Zhu, J., Watson, J., & Galagedera, D. U. A. (2012). Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3302-3317.
- Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21-41.
- Sengupta, J. (2003). Efficiency tests for mutual fund portfolios. Applied Financial Economics, 13(12), 869-876.
- Sharpe, W. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138.
- Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., & Omi, Y. (2010). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing industries after the lost decade. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 724-736.
- The Asset Management Association of China (2018). 2017 China Securities Investment Fund Fact Book. China Financial & Economic Publishing House.
- Tokic, D. (2012). Managed futures for long-term investors: A DEA ranking analysis. Australian Economic Review, 45(4), 422-440.
- Zhao, X., Wang, S., & Lai, K. K. (2011). Mutual funds performance evaluation based on endogenous benchmarks. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3663-3670.