New market reforms and stock exchange liquidity: the case of Kuwait
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.04
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #1, pp. 46-64
- 1841 Views
-
185 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In developing markets, new regulations are imposed to protect investors, to assure fairness and to enhance trust through controlling all types of market abuse. In addition, these regulations are imposed to enhance the overall market performance and efficiency. Market liquidity is one of the main pillars used to measure market overall performance. In this paper, the authors attempt to analyze market liquidity before and after the passage of the Capital Market Authority Law of 2010 (CMA), aimed at enhancing investors’ confidence and reinforcing better disclosure quality and accountability for Kuwait public companies. By introducing six liquidity measures that captures market depth, turnover, and volatility, the authors documented highly significant deterioration in all the measures following the CMA Law with more profound effect on smaller firms. The researchers concluded that overstated regulations in developing markets, in spite of its goal of improving market overall performance, structure, enhancing investors’ protection, and market integrity, can have an adverse effect on market efficiency.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G12, G18, G14
-
References36
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the main variables in pre-post CMA Law
- Table 2. Summary statistics of all the liquidity measures in the pre-post CMA Law period
- Table 3. Summary statistics of liquidity measures (trimmed basis) in pre and post CMA period
- Table 4. Mann-Whitney U test of the five liquidity measures and three trimmed measures
- Table 5. Student t-test of the five liquidity measures and three trimmed measures
- Table 6. Results of OSL regression for the liquidity measure PIILL (Model 1)
- Table 7. Results of OLS regression for the liquidity measure TV (Model 2)
- Table 8. Summary of hypotheses results testing of market liquidity in pre and post CMA Law period
-
- Adrian, T., Fleming, M., Shachar, O., & Vogt, E. (2017). Market liquidity after the financial crisis. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 9, 43-83.
- Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross sectional and time series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
- Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249.
- Asare, S., Cunningham L., & Wright, A. (2007). The Sarbanes- Oxley Act: legal implications and research opportunities. Research in Accounting Regulation, 19, 81-105.
- Bessembinder, H., Jacobsen, S., Maxwell, W., & Venkataraman, K. (2018). Capital Commitment and Illiquidity in Corporate Bonds. Journal of Finance, 73(4), 1615- 1661.
- Brennan, M. J., Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A., & Tong, Q. (2012). Sell-order liquidity and cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 523-541.
- Bushee, B. J., & Leuz, C. (2005). Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation: evidence from the OTC bulletin board. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 233-264.
- Campbell, J. Y., Grossman, S. J., & Wang, J. (1993). Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108(4): 905-939.
- Chelikani, S., & D’Souza, F. P. (2011). The impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on market efficiency: evidence from mergers and acquisitions activity. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 5(4), 75-88.
- Choi, W. G., & Cook, D. (2005). Stock market liquidity and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Japan (International Monetary Fund Working Papers (WP/05/6)).
- Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Periods. Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-787.
- Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Li, D. (2011). Exchange trading rules and stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 651-671.
- Daouk, H., Lee, C. M., & Ng, D. T. (2006). Capital market governance: how do securities laws affect market performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 560-593.
- Dick-Nielsen, J., Feldhutter, P., & Lando, D. (2012). Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3), 471-491.
- Downes, J., & Goodman, J. (2006). Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Fong, K. Y., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What are the best liquidity proxies for global research? Review of Finance, 21(4), 1355-1401.
- Garabedian, G., & Inghelbrecht, K. (2015). A unified market liquidity measure (Working Paper).
- Hasbrouck, J. (2003). Trading costs and returns for US equities: The evidence from daily data. Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1445- 1477.
- Heflin, F. L., Shaw, K. W., & Wild, J. J. (2005). Disclosure policy and market liquidity impact of depth quotes and order size. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 829-865.
- Ivanovic, Z. (1997). Financijski menadžment. Sveučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka.
- Jain, P.C., and Joh, G. H. (1988). The dependence between hourly prices and trading volume. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23(3), 269-83.
- Jain, P. K., & Rezaee, Z. (2006). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and capital market behavior: early evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(3), 629-654.
- Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P., & Talley, E. (2009). Going-Private Decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A Cross-Country Analysis. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25(1), 107-133.
- Kim, J., Jain, P. K., & Razaee, Z. (2006). Trends and Determinants of Market Liquidity in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act Periods. Proceedings from 14th AnnualConference on Financial Economics and Accounting (FEA). Bloomington, IN.
- Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6), 1315-1335.
- Lui, W. M., Soo, J., & Warren, G. J. (2016). The impact of broker market structure on stock liquidity (Working Paper). Center for International Finance and Regulation, Australian National University.
- Majnoni, G., & Massa, M. (2001). Stock exchange reforms and market efficiency: the Italian experience. European Financial Management, 7(1), 93-116.
- Prevoo, T., & Weel, B. (2010). The effects of change in market abuse regulation on abnormal returns and volumes: evidence from the Amsterdam stock market. De Economist, 158(3), 237-293.
- Pricewater House Coopers (PWC) (2015). Global Financial Markets Liquidity Study. Institute of International Finance IIF & GFMA, Special Report, 1-156.
- Rezaee, Z., Olibe, K., & Minmier, G. (2003). Improving corporate governance: the role of audit committee. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(6/7), 530-537.
- Ribstein, L. (2005). Sarbanes Oxley after three years (University of Illinois Law and Economic Research Paper (No. LE05-016)).
- Trebbi, F., & Xiao, K. (2016). Regulation and market liquidity (NBER Working Paper No. 21739). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Vayanos, D., & Wang, J. (2012). Market liquidity -theory and empirical evidence (NBER Working Paper No. 18251). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Wallison, P. J. (2015). Is the Dodd-Frank Act responsible for the economy’s slow recovery from the financial crisis and the ensuing recession? American Enterprise Institute.
- Westerfield, J. (1977). An examination of foreign exchange risk under fixed and floating rate regimes. Journal of International Economics, 7(2), 181-200.
- Zhang, I. X. (2007). Economic consequences of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 74-115.