An investigation of the financial monitoring policies for microfinance institutions in Ghana
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(4).2017.09
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #4, pp. 90-104
- Cited by
- 1051 Views
-
325 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The need to regulate microfinance institutions (MFIs) was advocated and researched yet lacks purposeful in-depth exploring studies of the formulation process of financial monitoring policies, their implementation and accompanying challenges. Consequently, this study contributes by reviewing the specific financial policies for microfinance in Ghana and assesses factors mitigating effective implementation of such policies. It also introduces implementation theory into the MF research arena, thus shifting MF research focus.
The study revealed that policies formulated for MFIs in Ghana and elsewhere are skewed and policy implementation, monitoring and supervision found to be less effective. The results further identified inadequate support structures and large unlicensed profit-oriented informal microfinance operations in Ghana as major obstacles to efficient implementation of microfinance policies. This paper therefore recommends the creation of a semi-autonomous institution, the National Microfinance Oversight Authority, to license, regulate and supervise the informal microfinance institutions in Ghana.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G28
-
References55
-
Tables1
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Policy implementation process model
- Figure 2. FMP model for MFIs
- Figure 3. Availability of FMPs for MFIs
- Figure 4. Level of cooperation and dialogue
-
- Table 1. KMO and Bartlett’s test
-
- Addae-Korankye, A. (2012). Microfinance and poverty reduction in Ghana. The Case of Central region of Ghana. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2(1), 135-141.
- Bank of Ghana (BoG) (2011). Operating Rules and Guidelines for Microfinance Institutions Notice No BG/GOV/SEC/2011/04/ (Accra: BoG).
- Bank of Ghana (BoG) Notice (2013). Notice to Banks, non-bank financial institutions and the general public.
- Bank of Ghana (BoG) (2015).
- Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American economic journal: Applied economics, 7(1), 22-53.
- Bateman, M. (2015). Policy-makers to address the shortcomings of microfinance; cancel commercialisation and regulate outstanding ones, encourage saving. Why doesn’t microfinance work? The destructive rise of local neoliberalism.
- Cairney, P. (2012). Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review, 1-14.
- CDC Consult Limited (2010). Study on regulation and supervision framework for microfinance institutions in the semi-formal and informal sectors. Accra, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning.
- CGAP (2011). What do we know about the impact of microfinance?
- CGAP (2012). A guide to regulation and supervision of microfinance.
- Cieslik, K., Hudon, M., & Verwimp, P. (2015). Unruly Entrepreneurs – Value Creation and Value Capture by Microfinance Clients in Rural Burundi (CEB Working Paper 15/013).
- Embrett, M. G., & Randall, G. E. (2014). Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory. Social Science & Medicine, 108(2014), 147-155.
- Foss, N. J., & Stea. (2014). Putting a realistic theory of mind into agency theory: Implications for reward design and management in principal-agent relations. European Management Review, 11, 101-116.
- Founanou, M., & Ratsimalahelo, Z. (2016). Regulation of microfinance institutions in developing countries: an incentives theory approach (Working paper No. 2016-3).
- Geyer, R. (2012). Can complexity move UK policy beyond ‘evidence-based policy making’ and the ‘audit culture’? Applying a ‘complexity cascade’ to education and health policy. Political studies, 60(1), 3-19.
- Gong, Y., & Janssen, M. (2012). From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 61-71.
- Guérin, I., Roesch, M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & D’Espallier, B. (2012). Credit from whom and for what? The diversity of borrowing sources and uses in rural southern India. Journal of International Development, 24(1), 122-137.
- Hallsworth, M., & Rutter, J. (2011). Making policy better. Institute for government, London.
- Hill, M. J., & Hupe, P. L. (2015). And the rest is implementation: Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 103-121.
- Ho, R. (2013). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS. CRC Press.
- Hoekstra, F., Alingh, R. A., van der Schans, C. P., Hettinga, F. J., Duijf, M., Dekker R., & van der Woude, L. H. V. (2014). Design of a process evaluation of the implementation of a physical activity and sports stimulation program in Dutch rehabilitation setting: ReSpAct. Implementation Science, 9, 127.
- Khalily, M. A. B., Khaleque, M. A., & Badruddoza, S. (2014). Impact of regulation on the cost efficiency of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Institute of Microfinance (InM) (Working Paper No. 22, 1-32).
- Kinde, B. A. (2012). Financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Ethiopia. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(15), 1-11.
- Kumar, S., & Gupta, K. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(8), 2319-4421.
- Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245-253.
- Little, A. (2012). Political Action, Error and Failure: The Epistemological Limits of Complexity. Political Studies, 60(1), 3-19.
- Llanto, G. M. (2015). Financial inclusion, education, and regulation in the Philippines (ADBI Working Paper 541). Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
- Magali, J. J. (2014). The influence of leadership, corporate governance and regulations on credit risk management: The study of rural SACCOS from Tanzania. Management and Administrative Sciences Review, 3(2), 262-281.
- Mago, S. (2013). Microfinance in Zimbabwe: A historical overview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14).
- Makuyana, T. (2016). Microfinance regulation and supervision in Zimbabwe: A critical overview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 376-385.
- May, C. (2013). Agency and implementation: Understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Social Science Mediterranean, 78, 26-33.
- May, C. (2013). Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science, 8(18), 1-14.
- May, P. J. (2014). Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 277-299.
- Ndambu, J. (2011). Does regulation increase microfinance performance in Sub-Saharan Africa? Technical Note No. 3/2011(1).
- Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013). Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science, 8(63), 1-12.
- Nzaro, R., Njanike K., & Jaravani, E. (2013). The impact of regulation policy on product and service delivery of micro-financial institutions: A case of Zimbabwe. Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2(9), 429-438.
- Ogbulu, O. M., Uruakpa, P. C., & Umezinwa, C. L. (2015). Empirical investigation of the impact of deposit rates on fund mobilization by Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Bank Management, 3(1), 77-89.
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42(5), 533-544.
- Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2012). Looking like a state: Techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation (WIDER Working Paper, No. 2012/63).
- Rahim, H. L., & Mohtar, S. (2015). Social Entrepreneurship: A Different Perspective. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology, 1(1), 9-15.
- Rahman, M. W., & Luo, J. (2012). Regulation of microfinance service provider in China and Bangladesh: An approach to strengthening the regulatory environment. African Journal of Business Management, 6(3), 1019-1033.
- Santos, F. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335-351.
- Santosh, K., Subrahmanyam, S. E. V., & Reddy, T. N. (2016). Microfinance – A holistic approach towards financial inclusion. Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research, 2(9), 1130-1137.
- Sarpong, L. S. (2016). Ghana’s Microfinance’s biggest challenges: Any Hope for the Future?
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers.
- Segun, O., Hussein, A., Daniel, O., & Olajide, A. (2015). Regulation of microfinance institutions in Africa major economies: A comparative analysis. The International Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 77-84.
- Sinclair, H. (2012). Confessions of a Microfinance Heretic: How Microlending Lost Its Way and Betrayed the Poor.
- Smith, K. E., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2012). A glossary of theories for understanding policymaking (JECH 10.1136/jech-2012-200990).
- Stewart, R., van Rooyen, C., Dickson, K., Majoro, M., & de Wet, T. (2010). What is the impact of microfinance on poor people? A systematic review of evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. University of London.
- Traynor, K., & Andrews, J. C. (2015). Factor Analysis: Revisited. In Proceedings of the 1984 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 479-479). Springer International Publishing.
- Turner, N. W. (2012). The financial action task force: international regulatory convergence through soft law. 59 New York Law School. Law Review, 547(2014–2015), 547-559.
- Wierenga, D., Engbers, L. H., Van Empelen, P., Duijts, S., Hildebrandt, V. H., & Van Mechelen, W. (2013). What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13, 1190.
- Wilkinson, J. E., & Frost, H. (2015). Horses for Courses. Comment on “Translating evidence into healthcare policy and practice: Single versus multi-faceted implementation strategies – Is there a simple answer to a complex question? International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4(10), 685-686.
- Winter, J. (2012). A behavorial perspective on corporate law and corporate governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance.
- Zahra, S., Pati, R., & Zhao, L. (2013). How does counterproductive entrepreneurship undermine social wealth creation? In F. Welter (Ed.), RENT Anthology of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
-
Integrated Financial Management Information System: a conceptual framework for Migori County, Kenya
Public and Municipal Finance Volume 6, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 37-45 Views: 2466 Downloads: 2200 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the modern world, developing countries like Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia and several others in the African continent have been encouraged to reform their public expenditure management systems through computerization of the entire public sectors in response to the increasing volume of data or information that need to be processed. There are, however, various factors to be considered prior to the implementation of the public expenditure management information systems. This paper undertakes a theoretical review of the critical success factors that impact on the implementation of an Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) with a view to identify factors applicable to the Migori County of Kenya. The paper, then, identifies the key factors to be incorporated in the proposed IFMS framework. The proposed framework draws from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) and the Work Around Theory (WAT). The paper fuses these theories towards a successful adoption of use of modern technology within the public sector IFMS. The key factors include technical, organizational, environmental, cultural and ethical behavior. These factors could improve efficiency and transparency through direct payments to suppliers and contractors, reduced prices due to gains based on the time value of money, as well as the comparative analysis of market rates and advanced relations across the numerous organizational units within government on execution, reporting, and thoroughness of budget transactions.
-
Regulating Big Data effects in the European insurance market
Donatella Porrini
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ins.08(1).2017.01
Insurance Markets and Companies Volume 8, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 6-15 Views: 2167 Downloads: 379 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe article analyzes the regulatory framework in the insurance market in connection with the advent of Big Data, such as information collected from different sources that can be manipulated by new technologies. The use of Big Data offers significant opportunities to the insurance companies in terms of digitization of the distribution channels and greater knowledge of the customers, which is instrumental to a more effective identification of the individual’s risk profile, as well as improvement of the competitiveness. However, regulatory measures are needed for a proper use of Big Data in terms of respect of the individual privacy, potential discrimination and constraint on competition.
-
SDGs and ESG disclosure regulation: is there an impact? Evidence from Top-50 world economies
Alex Plastun ,
Inna Makarenko ,
Lyudmila Khomutenko ,
Oksana Osetrova ,
Pavlo Shcherbakov
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.20
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 231-245 Views: 1853 Downloads: 364 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper explores the influence of the ESG disclosure regulation (government corporate ESG disclosure and non-government corporate ESG disclosure) on the ranking in 50 largest economies. Applying various statistical methods and techniques, including both parametrical (Student’s t-test, ANOVA analysis) and non-parametrical (Mann-Whitney U test) tests, simple average analysis, OLS with dummy variables method and multiple linear regression analysis, as well as correlation analysis and Granger causality test, several hypotheses are tested. The hypotheses stipulate whether or not ESG disclosure regulation differs in developed and emerging countries and whether or not ESG disclosure regulation influences the country’s SDGI ranking, as well as the ranking of the country among 50 largest economies. According to the results, the differences in ESG disclosure regulation are statistically significant in developed and emerging countries. The level of ESG disclosure compliance is higher in developed countries. ESG disclosure regulation influences the position of the country in SDGI and 50 largest economies rankings. The more country complies with ESG disclosure criteria, the better position in rankings is. Incorporation of ESG criteria is an important evolutionary step in economic development of the country. It allows increasing position of the country in 50 largest economies and SDGI ranking. Thus, ESG disclosure regulation is vital for the development of the country in the modern world.
Acknowledgment
Comments from the Editor and anonymous referees have been gratefully acknowledged. Alex Plastun gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0117U003936). Inna Makarenko gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0117U003933).
