Government subsidy, strategic profitability and its impact on financial performance: empirical evidence from Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3).2017.13
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #3, pp. 135-147
- Cited by
- 1512 Views
-
350 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This paper examines the moderating impact of capital structure on the relationship between government subsidy, strategic profitability and financial strength of state-owned enterprises in Indonesia. A purposive sampling is used and data were collected from seven state-owned enterprises over the period of 2005 to 2016. The empirical evidence provided by this paper indicates that government subsidy has a significant negative impact on the financial strength, which means that the state-owned enterprises are difficult to manage the company independently if the government continues to provide subsidies or additional capital. This study also found that strategic profitability has a significant positive impact on the financial strength, which means there are opportunities for management to perform profitability practice of earnings management as strategic to enhance the level of financial strength of the company. However, capital structure is strengthening the relations of ‘government subsidy’ and ‘real earnings management’ with the financial strength. So far, it is still little known how ‘capital structure’ affects the relationship between government subsidy and financial strength, specifically in the case of state-owned enterprises.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G, G3, G320
-
References31
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Operationalization of variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlations matrix (Pearson)
- Table 4. Results of regression analysis (hypotheses testing)
- Table 5. Summary results of the hypotheses testing
-
- Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438-445.
- Altman, E. I. (2000). Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the Z-score and ZETA models. Stern School of Business, New York University, 9-12.
- Assagaf, A. (2014). Influence Policy and Fitness State Electricity Company (PLN) Investment Business Generation. International Journal of Empirical Finance, 3(5), 234-242.
- Assagaf, A. (2015). Analysis of Relevance Concept of Measurement CAPM Return and Risk of Shares. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(10), 194.
- Assagaf, A., Lestari, S. Y., & Hamzah, M. Z. (2016). The Effects of the Implementation of Earning Management and Subsidy Policy: A Case Study of Government Company. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(10), 23-34.
- Aulia, D., Ikhwana, D. (2012). Business Development Strategy Planning Woven Silk with Balanced Scorecard Approach Method (Case Study in Three Men’s Silk Factory). Journal Ssttgarut, 10(1), 1-12.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
- Bercovitz, J., & Mitchell, W. (2007). When is more better? The impact of business scale and scope on long‐term business survival, while controlling for profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 61-79.
- Capon, N., Farley, J. U., & Hoenig, S. (1990). Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis. Management science, 36(10), 1143-1159.
- Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting review, 193-225.
- Dinar, A., & Yaron, D. (1992). Adoption and abandonment of irrigation technologies. Agricultural Economics, 6(4), 315-332.
- González, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, 930-950.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305- 360.
- Hadlock, C. J., & Sonti, R. (2012). Financial strength and product market competition: Evidence from asbestos litigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(1), 179-211.
- Haron, H., Hartadi, B., Ansari, M., & Ismail, I. (2009). Factors influencing auditor’s going concern opinion. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 1-19.
- Hassan, R., Marimuthu, M., & Johl, S. K. (2015a). Ethnic Diversity on Boards and Market Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1099-1103.
- Hassan, R., Marimuthu, M., & Johl, S. K. (2015b, August). Demographic diversity and firm value: A review on large companies using panel data approach. In Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), 2015 International Symposium (pp. 197-201). IEEE.
- Hassan, R., Marimuthu, M., & Johl, S. K. (2015c). Diversity, corporate governance and implication on firm financial performance. Global Business and Management Research, 7(2), 28.
- Hassan, R., Marimuthu, M., & Johl, S. K. (2016d). Women on boards and market performance: An exploratory study on the listed companies. International Business Management, 10(2), 84-91.
- Hassan, R., Marimuthu, M., & Johl, S. K. (2017e). Bridging and Bonding: How Gender Diversity Influence Organizational Performance. Global Business and Management Research, 9(1), 117.
- Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2014a). Gender Diversity on Boards and Market Performance: An Empirical Investigation on Malaysian Listed Companies. PLATFORM-A Journal of Engineering, Science and Society, 10, 17-25.
- Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2015b). Corporate Governance Effect on Ownership and Control in Firms: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 212.
- Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2016c). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value: Examining Large Companies Using Panel Data Approach. Economics Bulletin, 36(3), 1737- 1750.
- Khan, H., Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2017). Diversity on Corporate Boards and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. Humanities, 2(1), 1-8.
- Simpson, R. J. S., & Pearson, K. (1904). Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. The British Medical Journal, 1243-1246.
- Pratheepkanth, P., (2011). Capital Structure and Financial Performance: Evidence from Selected Business Companies in Colombo Stock Exchange Sri Lanka. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 1(2), 171-183.
- Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of accounting and economics, 42(3), 335-370.
- Schreiner, M. J. (1997). A framework for the analysis of the performance and sustainability of subsidized microfinance organizations with application to Bancosol of Bolivia and Grameen Bank of Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
- Schreiner, M. (1997). How to measure the subsidy received by a development finance institution. Rural Finance Program, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ohio State University.
- Schreiner, M., & Yaron, J. (1999). The Subsidy Dependence Index and Recent Attempts to Adjust It/Une Revue De L’indice De Dépendance Aux Subventions Et des Récents Essais De L’ajuster. Savings and Development, 375-405.
- Taco, C., & Ilat, V. (2016). Effect of Earning Power, Independent Commissioner, Board of Directors, Audit Committee and Company Size of Profit Management in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. EMBA Journal, 4(4), 873-884.