Do the organization types of audit firms matter to earnings conservatism? Evidence from China

  • Received February 15, 2017;
    Accepted May 4, 2017;
    Published June 6, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Tzu-Ching Weng
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2).2017.11
  • Article Info
    Volume 14 2017, Issue #2, pp. 116-127
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • 930 Views
  • 206 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

This study explores whether legal liability of audit firms is associated with client’s earnings conservatism. In China, audit firms are allowed to choose between legal forms of general partnership (GP) and limited liability corporation (LLC). Because partner auditor is personally liable for all partners’ service in general partnership form, that will provide an incentive for audit partners to monitor each other’s audit quality. Conversely, personal assets of individual partner, under LLC, are no longer available to pay a partnership’s liability, thus reducing the incentives for intrafirm monitoring by partners within an audit firm. Using several different methods for identifying earnings conservatism, this study finds that LLC audit firms are associated with reduced conservatism.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Sample selection and distribution of audit firm legal forms
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 3. Pearson correlations
    • Table 4. Earnings conservatism and organization type: Earnings return model
    • Table 5. Earnings conservatism and organization type: Accrual based model
    • Table 6. Persistence of price-deflated earnings changes and organization type
    • Ahmed, A., Billings, B., Morton, R., Harris, M. (2002). The role of accounting conservatism in. mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflict over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review, 77, 867-890.
    • Ball, R., and Shivakumar, L. (2002). Earnings quality in UK private firms. Working Paper, London Business School.
    • Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., and Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 1-51.
    • Ball, R., Robin, A., and Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36, 235-270.
    • Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., and Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22, 71-97.
    • Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3-37.
    • Basu, S., Hwang, L. S., and Jan, C. L. (2001). Differences in conservatism between big eight and non-Big eight auditors. Working Paper, City University of New York and California State University-Hayward.
    • Beaver, W. H. (1993). Conservatism. Working paper, Stanford University (presented at the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA).
    • Beaver, W. H., Lambert, R., and Morse, D. (1980). The information content of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2, 3-28.
    • Carcello, J. V., and Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 55-69.
    • Chi, H. Y., and Weng, T. C. (2014). Managerial Legal Liability and Big 4 Auditor Choice. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1857-1869.
    • Chin, C. L., and Chi, H. Y. (2005). The Association between Auditor Independence and Organization Types of Audit Firms in China. The Inaugural Forum on Database and Accounting and Finance Empirical Study. The Guanghua School of Management, Peking University (in China).
    • Choi, J. H., Doogar, R. K., and Ganguly, A. R. (2004). The riskiness of large audit firm client portfolios and changes in audit liability regimes: Evidence from the U. S. audit market. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 747-785.
    • DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183-199.
    • DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., and Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1247-1274.
    • Dye, R. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 75-114.
    • Dye, R. (1993). Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 887-914.
    • Firth, M., Mo, P. L. L., and Wong, R. M. K. (2005). An empirical study on the legal form of CPA firms and auditors’ reporting conservatism. Working paper, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    • Gigler, F. B., and Hemmer, T. (2001). Conservatism, optimal disclosure policy, and the timeliness of financial reports. The Accounting Review, 76, 471-493.
    • Givoly, D., and Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287-320.
    • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Fifth edition, Prentice Hall.
    • Kothari, S. P., and Sloan, R. (1992). Information in prices about future earnings: Implications for earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 143-172.
    • Krishnan, G. V. (2005). The association between big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Economics, 20, 209-228.
    • Li, C., Song, F. M., and Wong, S. M. (2004). Audit firm size effects in China’s emerging audit markets. Working Paper. The University of Hong Kong.
    • Li, Y. (1999). The Reform, Regulation and Opening-up of China’s Accounting Market, in Contemporary Issues in China Accounting and Finance Policy and Practice, edited by G. Chen, X. Chen and J. K. Cheung. Oxford University Press.
    • Matsumoto, D. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77, 483-514.
    • Muzatko, S. R., Johnstone, K. M., Mayhew, B. W., and Rittenberg, L. E. (2004). An empirical investigation of IPO underpricing and the change to the LLP organization of audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 53-67.
    • Narayanan, V. (1994). An analysis of auditor liability rules. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, supplement, 39-64.
    • Penman, S. H., and Zhang, X. J. (2002). Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Return. The Accounting Review, 77, 237-264.
    • Ruddock, C., Taylor, S. J., and Taylor, S. L. (2006). Nonaudit services and earnings conservatism: Is auditor independence impaired? Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 701-746.
    • Schwartz, R. (1997). Legal regimes, audit quality, and investment. The Accounting review, 60, 248-261.
    • Simonetti, G., and Andrew, A. (1994). Limiting accountants’ personal liability won’t solve the country’s liability crisis. Journal of Accountancy, 177, 46-49.
    • Teoh, S. H., and Wong, T. J. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68, 346-367.
    • Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting Part 1: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17, 207-221.
    • Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting Part 2: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17, 287-301.
    • Watts, R. L. (1993). A proposal for research on conservatism. Working paper, University of Rochester.
Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations