Forecasting the level of earnings management of Russian and Chinese companies

  • 1186 Views
  • 327 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The purpose of the current paper is to elaborate a model to forecast a particular type of earnings management by companies: upward earnings management, downward earnings management or the absence of significant manipulation.
The sample analyzed in the current paper comprises 664 Russian and 2,380 Chinese public companies for the period 2009-2014. The forecast was made for 2014 based on annual accounting data for 2009-2013. Regression analysis, as well as Classification and Regression Tree modelling (CART), were used. The data forecast for 2014 was compared with actual data for that year, and the accuracy of the forecasting model was assessed.
The paper outlines the main conditions under which a particular type of earnings manipulation is expected to take place in a company in the accounting period following the current one. It is shown that the main factor influencing the company’s level of earnings manipulation of the next accounting period for both Russian and Chinese companies is the debt ratio calculated as the ratio of total liabilities to total assets. The other important factors are: the company size, return on equity, earnings persistence, the level of earnings manipulation in the current period and stock emission.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1a. Industrial affiliation of companies
    • Figure 1b. Industrial affiliation of companies
    • Figure 2a. Quantiles of distribution of discretionary accruals of the companies of the sample based on actual data for 2014 (Russia)
    • Figure 2b. Quantiles of distribution of discretionary accruals of the companies of the sample based on actual data for 2014 (China)
    • Figure 3a. Decision tree to determine clusters of earnings management (Russia)
    • Figure 3b. Decision tree to determine clusters of earnings management (China)
    • Table 1. Variables used to forecast companies’ level of earnings manipulation
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics of Russian and Chinese samples of data
    • Table 3. The Jones model parameters estimation for 2014 (Russian and Chinese companies)
    • Table 4. Parameters of company X compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 1 “Earnings decreasing companies”
    • Table 5. Parameters of company Y compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 2 “Insignificant earnings manipulation”
    • Table 6. Parameters of company Z compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 3 “Earnings increasing companies”
    • Table 7. Parameters of company X compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 1 “Earnings decreasing companies”
    • Table 8. Parameters of company YY compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 2 “Insignificant earnings manipulation”
    • Table 9. Parameters of company ZZ compared to the decision tree conditions for Cluster 3 “Earnings increasing companies”
    • Alves, S. (2013). The Association Between Goodwill Impairment and Discretionary Accruals: Portuguese Evidence. Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 20(2), 84-98.
    • Chan, L. H., Chen, K. C. W., Tai, Y. C., & Yangxin, Y. (2015). Substitution between Real and Accruals-Based Earnings Management after Voluntary Adoption of Compensation Clawback Provisions. Accounting Review, 90(1), 147-174.
    • Cohen, D., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities Around Seasoned Equity Offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 2-19.
    • Cohen, D., Dey A., & Lys, T. (2008). Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre-and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Period. Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-787.
    • DeAngelo, L. (1986). Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders. Accounting Review, 61, 400-420.
    • Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. (2000). Earnings Management: Reconciling the Views of Accounting Academics, Practitioners, and Regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235-250.
    • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. Accounting Review, 70, 193-225.
    • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, 1-36.
    • DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt Covenant Violations and Manipulation of Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145-176.
    • Etemadi, H., & Moghadam, H. (2014). The Competition between Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models in Earning Management Prediction. International Review of Business Research Papers, 10(2), 148-159.
    • Gaganis, C. (2009). Classification Techniques for the Identification of Falsified Financial Statements: A Comparative Analysis. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 16, 207-229.
    • Garanina, T., Nikulin, E., & Frangulantc, O. (2016). Earnings Management and R&D Costs Capitalization: Evidence from Russian and German Markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(1), 206-214.
    • Graceffo, A. (2016). State-owned Enterprises Still a Major Force in the Chinese Economy and Abroad.
    • Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3-73.
    • Gridina, O. N., Kosmina, O. I., & Starodubtceva, Yu. V. (2014). Con¬temporary position of the oil and gas industry of Russia. Scientibic and methodical journal “Concept”, 26, 546-550.
    • Guidara, R., & Boujelbene, Y. (2015). R&D Expenditures and Earnings Targets: Evidence from France. Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 2(2), 164-180.
    • Healy, P. M. (1985). The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85-107.
    • Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
    • Iatridis, G. (2010). International Financial Reporting Standards and the Quality of Financial Statements Information. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19, 193-204.
    • Ibrahim, S. (2009). The Usefulness of Measures of Consistency of Discretionary Components of Accruals in the Detection of Earnings Management. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36(9-10), 1087-1116.
    • Jiang, Y. (1998). An Empirical Study on Earnings Management in Listed Companies–An Analysis of Threshold on EPS and ROE. Working Paper, Shanghai University of Economics and Finance.
    • Jones, J. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228.
    • Kim, Y. (2015). Economic transition in Russia and China. Economic Scientific Journal, 1, 355-366.
    • Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. (2005). Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163-197.
    • Li, Y., Liu, J., & Eddie, I. (2011). Share Types and Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(2), 271-284.
    • Loukianova, A., Nikulin, E., & Zinchenko, A. (2016). Forecasting the Level of Company’s Earnings Manipulation. Vestnik of Saint- Petersburg University, Ser. 8. Management, iss. 2, 35-61.
    • Malik, M. (2015). Corporate Governance and Real Earnings Management: The Role of the Board and Institutional Investors. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 8(1), 37-87.
    • Marquardt, C. A., & Wiedman, C. I. (2004). How are Earnings Managed? An Examination of Specific Accruals. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 461-491.
    • Maydew, E. L. (1997). Tax- Induced Earnings Management by Firms with Net Operating Losses. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(1), 83-96.
    • McNichols, M., & Wilson, G. P. (1988). Evidence of Earnings Management from the Provision for Bad Debts. Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 1-31.
    • Nazer, K. (2013). Determinants of Firms Managing EPS Through Share Repurchases. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 17(4), 83-94.
    • Rasmussen, S. (2013). Revenue Recognition, Earnings Management and Earnings Informativeness in the Semiconductor Industry. Accounting Horizons, 27(1), 91-112.
    • Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings Management Through Real Activities Manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
    • Russia – Competition from State- Owned Enterprises.
    • Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary: Earnings Management. Accounting Horizons, 9(4), 91-102.
    • Scott, W. (1997). Financial Accounting Theory. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
    • Shust, E. (2015). Does Research and Development Activity Increase Accrual-Based Earnings Management? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 30(3), 373-401.
    • Song, Y., & Lu, Y. (2015). Decision Tree Methods: Applications for Classification and Prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 27(2), 130-135
    • Stanley, B. W., & Sharma, V. I. (2011). To Cheat or Not to Cheat: How Bank Debt Influences the Decision to Misreport. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(2), 383-414.
    • Strobl, G. (2013). Earnings Manipulation and the Cost of Capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2), 449-473.
    • Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings Management and the Long Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Finance, LIII(6), 1935-1974.
    • Tsai, C., & Chiou, Y. (2009). Earnings Management Prediction: A Pilot Study of Combining Neural Networks and Decision Trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7183-7191.
    • Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2005). Earnings Management under German GAAP vs IFRS. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 155-180.
    • Wu, Y. W. (1997). Management Buyouts and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 12(4), 373-389.
    • Zang, A. (2012). Evidence on The Trade-Off Between Real Activities Manipulation and Accrual- Based Earnings Management. Accounting Review, 87(2), 675-703.
    • Zeng, X. Yuan, S., Li, Y., & Zou, Q. (2014). Decision Based Classification Model for Popularity Forecast of Chinese Colleges. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1-7.
Related Articles

  • The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: accounting for endogeneity

    Hyunjung Choi , Byungchul ChoiORCID , Jungyoon ByunORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.06
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 69-84 Views: 4619 Downloads: 545 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management after controlling for endogeneity of CSR. Using a sample of non-financial firms listed on Korean Securities Market between 2002 and 2010, this study finds that ignoring endogeneity biases the estimated relation between CSR and earnings management. Specifically, the results show that the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and discretionary accruals reported in the previous studies becomes insignificant. However, the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and real activities manipulation remains significant even when the endogeneity of CSR commitment is taken into account. Therefore, this study provides evidence that proactive CSR engagement significantly affects firm’s practice of real activities manipulation, while it does not affect its practice of discretionary accruals. These results indicate that CSR commitment leads managers to be more responsible in management of operational activities than in accruals management.

  • The impact of key audit matter (KAM) disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review

    Patrick VelteORCID Researcher ID, Jakob Issa doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #3         pp. 323-341 Views: 4539 Downloads: 1863 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This article presents a literature review of 49 empirical studies on key audit matter (KAM) disclosure in audit reports. The study involves a structured literature review on KAM disclosure based on the reactions of stakeholders. The limitations of former studies and useful recommendations for research are stressed. Five major streams of empirical research that analyze the impact of KAM disclosure on stakeholders’ reactions are focused: (1) shareholders (e.g. investors’ perceptions of auditors’ responsibility and litigation, value relevance and investors’ decisions); (2) debtholders (e.g. loan contracting terms); (3) external auditors (e.g. audit processes and audit fees); (4) boards of directors (e.g. earnings management); and (5) other stakeholders (e.g. informational value for suppliers and customers). The authors stress that most of the included studies use experimental or archival data and analyze the impact of KAM disclosure on investor reactions in a US-American setting. As the international standard setters assume a positive impact of KAM on stakeholder reactions, mixed empirical results are found. Although there are some indications of decreased earnings management behavior, most studies find no significant changes in auditor behavior. Furthermore, there are many insignificant results with regard to shareholders’ reaction in line with our stakeholder and behavioral agency framework. The literature review is especially useful for management decisions, because firm reputation may be positively or negatively influenced by KAM regulations.

  • The effect of the ownership structure on earnings management practices

    Sanaa MaswadehORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.04
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 48-60 Views: 2272 Downloads: 290 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the ownership structure, which includes concentration ownership, institutional ownership and foreign ownership in the light of the debt ratio and company size as controlling variables in limiting the earnings management practices of the Jordanian industrial companies for the period 2012–2016. The hypotheses of the study were tested using the multiple regression models. Among the most prominent findings of the study are: the explanatory factor (R2) for the independent and control variables accounts for 38% of the change in the earnings management of the Jordanian industrial companies, moreover, a significant effect of the concentration ownership was found in the limitation of earnings management practices; while, there was no significant influence of institutional ownership and foreign ownership on the earnings management practices in Jordanian industrial companies. Major limitation to this study is the only considered listed industrial Jordanian firms. Thus, the generalization of the results to other sectors and diverse economic conditions and regulations may be constrained. Finally, Jordanian policymaker reform policies motivate companies to increase their interest on concentration ownership structure, as the study showed the significant effect of the concentration ownership in the limitation of earnings management practice.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations