Relating corporate social investment with financial performance
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2-2).2017.08
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #2 (cont. 2), pp. 367-375
- Cited by
- 1314 Views
-
593 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Previous researchers have found conflicting results between CSI and firm financial performance. This paper moves this debate further by examining the extent to which corporate social investment (CSI) relates with corporate financial performance (CFP) from a developing country perspective. The main aim of the paper was to determine the relationship between CSI, stock price, sales turnover and return on equity (ROE) amongst the socially responsible investing (SRI) companies in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. CSI data on the SRI companies were collected from companies’ integrated reports from 2011 to 2015. Therefore, a cross-sectional panel data arrangement was applied and the analysis was conducted using the ordinary least square (OLS). Tested at an alpha level of 0.05, the regression result produced a probability level of P < 0.01 for share price and sales turnover; and P = 10 for return on equity. Therefore, the findings revealed a strong positive and significant linkage between the SRI companies’ social investment, share price and sales turnover and no significant linkage with return on equity. These findings are consistent with previous literature findings reviewed in the paper on similar research conducted in developed countries, which showed positive and negative relationships. Findings from the literature indicate that various factors may account for conflicting results, which includes inter alia, time coverage, size of data, location, market sustainability awareness and culture. The paper contributes by revealing that whilst CSI may trigger improvement in stock price and sales turnover of SRI companies, the sales turnover might not necessarily result in boost in profit level that could engender enough return on equity within a short period time. The conflicting results from the literature is indicative of the inclusiveness in research between CSI and firm performance. Hence, the paper recommends further research to examine the relationship within a longer period of time using new sample of companies and other methods of analysis.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M11, M41
-
References42
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Link between corporate social investment (CSI) and share price (ShP) of those companies
- Table 2. Association between corporate social investment (CSI) and turnover
- Table 3. Relationship exists between corporate social investment (CSI) and return on equity
- Table 4. Interpretation of results
-
- Adams, C. A., Potter, B., Singh, P. J., & York, J. (2016). Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 283-296.
- Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. F., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872-1881.
- Alafi, K. & Hasoneh, A. B. (2012). Corporate social responsibility associated with customer satisfaction and financial performance a case study with housing banks in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(15), 102-115.
- Al-Shammari, H. A. (2006). CEO Option Pay, Risk Taking, and Firm Performance: An Examination of the Moderating Effects of Firm Governance Structure, Strategy, and Environment. Texas: The University of Texas at Arlington.
- Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304-1320.
- Bhimani, A., Silvola, H., & Sivabalan, P. (2016). Voluntary corporate social responsibility reporting: A study of early and late reporter motivations and outcomes. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 77-101.
- Blackburn, V. L., Doran, M., & Shrader, C. B. (1994). Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 195-212.
- Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press, Lowa City.
- Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61-78.
- Charlo, M. J., Moya, I., & Muñoz, A. M. (2015). Sustainable development and corporate financial performance: a study based on the FTSE4Good IBEX Index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4), 277-288.
- De Klerk, M., de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C. (2015). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure on share prices: evidence from the United Kingdom. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 208-228.
- De MaCarty, P. (2009). Financial returns of corporate social responsibility, and the moral freedom and responsibility of business leaders. Business and Society Review, 114(3), 393-433.
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Employment. (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility: Green Paper. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons, 50(3), 247-254.
- Firli, A., & Akbar, N. (2016). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Solve ROA Problem in Indonesia Telecommunication Industry? American Journal of Economics, 6(2), 107-115.
- Franks, D. M., Davis, R., Bebbington, A. J., Ali, S. H., Kemp, D., & Scurrah, M. (2014). Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7576-7581.
- Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
- Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., Zafeiriu, E., & Partalidou, X. (2016). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3), 171-182.
- Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., Zafeiriu, E., & Partalidou, X. (2017). The effect of Dow Jones Sustainability Index on consumer. Investment Management and Financial Innovation, 14(1), 89- 95.
- Henderson, R. (2015). Making the Business Case for Environmental Sustainability.
- Hirsch, S. (2017). Successful in the long run: a meta‐regression analysis of persistent firm profits. Journal of Economic Surveys.
- Hubbard, T. D., Christensen, D. M., & Graffin, S. D. (2017). Higher highs and lower lows: the role of corporate social responsibility in CEO Dismissal. Strategic Management Journal.
- Mynhardt, H., Makarenko, I., & Plastun, A. (2017). Market efficiency of traditional stock market indices and social responsible indices: the role of sustainability reporting. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(2), 94-106.
- Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., & Dibbern, J. (Eds.). (2009). Information systems outsourcing: enduring themes, global challenges, and process opportunities. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Herek, A. G. (2012). A brief introduction to sampling.
- IDS (Institute of Directors in Southern Africa) (2013). King III reporting in terms of the JSEListings Requirements.
- Kecskes, A., Mansi, S., & Nguyen, P. A. (2016). Can Firms Do Well for Shareholders by Doing Good for Stakeholders? The Importance of Long-Term Investors.
- Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.
- Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. C. (2017). Do Chinese state subsidies affect voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 179-200.
- Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2016). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis.
- Lakshitha, W. R., & Perera, H. A. P. L. (2016). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from the Listed Manufacturing Companies in Sri Lanka.
- Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Create Shareholder Value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research.
- Mondi. (2012). Sustainability report 2012.
- Nakashima, M., & Ota, S. (2016). Association Between Corporate Financial Performance And Corporate Social Responsibility In A Crisis: Focusing on the March 11 Disaster. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 11(2).
- Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
- Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 59-76.
- Reverte, C., Gómez-Melero, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2870-2884.
- Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. Berrett- Koehler Publishers.
- Solomon, J., & Maroun, W. (2012). Integrated reporting: the influence of King III on social, ethical and environmental reporting.
- Wang, H., Lu, W., Ye, M., Chau, K. W., & Zhang, X. (2016). The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the international construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1313-1322.
- Yu-Chun, L. (2017). Does R&D investment under corporate social responsibility increase firm performance? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(1-1), 217-226.
- Yakovleva, N. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries. Routledge, New York.
-
Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development
Anis Ali
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 23-35 Views: 3087 Downloads: 1043 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIndustrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.
-
Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?
Sarwar Uddin Ahmed ,
Samiul Parvez Ahmed ,
Ikramul Hasan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 71-80 Views: 2863 Downloads: 1146 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhy banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.
-
Integrated reporting and financial performance of South African listed banks
Reon Matemane ,
Rozane Wentzel
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.11
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 128-139 Views: 2800 Downloads: 553 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe recent development of integrated reporting intends to address the limitations associated with corporate reporting practices. This paper aims to examine whether a statistically significant relationship exists between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. Secondary data was used, namely the integrated reports and annual financial statements of South African banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) for 2010–2014. For the period 2005–2009, only the financial statements were used, since integrated reporting was not yet mandatory. The research design was longitudinal and it combined qualitative and quantitative methods. Descriptive statistics and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) were used to explore the relationships between financial performance and integrated reporting quality. The results indicate that there is a positive relationship between integrated reporting quality (IRQ) and earnings per share (EPS). However, there is no significant relationship between IRQ and Tobin’s q (Q-Ratio), IRQ and return on equity (ROE), IRQ and return on assets (ROA) as well as IRQ and economic value added (EVA). Moreover, there are no significant differences on the financial performance of the listed banks before and after the introduction of integrated reporting.
