Factors influencing carbon-labeled product purchase intentions: A case study in Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(1).2024.13
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2024, Issue #1, pp. 146-159
- 490 Views
-
220 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to examine university students’ intention to purchase carbon-labeled products in Can Tho City, Vietnam, as well as the main reasons driving the desire to purchase carbon-labeled products. A survey was conducted using quantitative analytic methodologies, and 234 students’ responses were obtained using Google Forms during the third quarter of 2023. Before surveying student participants, ten educational experts crafted and reviewed a questionnaire. The questionnaire had three sections. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and SPSS are used to assess the data. This study analyzed independent variables such as sustainable consumption habits, the green halo effect, carbon label visibility, and climate consciousness to consider their impact on the dependent variable of purchase intention. To guarantee the dependability of these variables, Cronbach’s Alpha was employed with a threshold set at 0.60. The findings demonstrate Vietnamese students’ comparatively low level of understanding regarding carbon labeling. Only 45.7% of the 234 survey participants claimed to have heard of carbon labels, compared to 54.3% who said they had never heard of them. Furthermore, sustainable consumption habits and the green halo effect directly impact the intentions to purchase carbon-labeled products, in which sustainable consumer habits play the most critical role. Carbon label visibility and climate consciousness do not directly influence the intention to buy, but these factors contribute to increasing purchase intention.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D20, F60, A10, M10
-
References70
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework
- Figure 2. Direct and indirect impacts on the intention to buy items with carbon labeling
-
- Table 1. Sample structure
- Table 2. Cronbach’s alpha analysis
- Table 3. Exploratory factor analysis
- Table 4. Construct validity assessment
- Table 5. Fit indices for the CFA measurement model
- Table 6. Model’s findings
- Table A1. Questionaire items
-
- Ahmad, A., & Thyagaraj, K. S. (2015). Consumer’s intention to purchase green brands: The roles of environmental concern, environmental knowledge and self expressive benefits. Current World Environment, 10(3), 879-889.
- Aitken, R., Watkins, L., Williams, J., & Kean, A. (2020). The positive role of labelling on consumers’ perceived behavioural control and intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120334.
- Amri, S., & Prihandono, D. (2019). Influence lifestyle, consumer ethnocentrism, product quality on purchase decision through purchase intention. Management Analysis Journal, 8(1), 25-28.
- Arora, N. K., Fatima, T., Mishra, I., Verma, M., Mishra, J., & Mishra, V. (2018). Environmental sustainability: Challenges and viable solutions. Environmental Sustainability, 1(4), 309-340.
- Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., & Mamat, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based structural equation modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13-21.
- Azizan, S. A. M., & Suki, N. M. (2013). Consumers’ intention to purchase green product: Insights from Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(8), 1129-1134.
- Babakhani, N., Lee, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2020). Carbon labels on restaurant menus: do people pay attention to them? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(1), 51-68.
- Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
- Bhardwaj, N. (2012). Consumer buying behaviour toward carbon labelling (FMCG) in Tesco supermarket. International Journal of Data and Network Security, 1(2), 1-11.
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
- Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150-1152.
- Chang, C. C., Tsai, J. M., Hung, S. W., & Lin, B. C. (2015). A hybrid decision-making model for factors influencing the purchase intentions of technology products: The moderating effect of lifestyle. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(12), 1200-1214.
- Chiu, C-M., Hsu, M-H., Lai, H., & Chang, C-M. (2010). Exploring online repeat purchase intentions: The role of habit. PACIS 2010 Proceedings.
- Chong, B., & Wong, M. (2005). Crafting an effective customer retention strategy: A review of halo effect on customer satisfaction in online auctions. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2(1).
- Choshaly, S. H. (2018). Applying innovation attributes to predict purchase intention for the eco-labeled products. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(4), 583-599.
- Chu, T. T. H. (2018). Environmental pollution in Vietnam: Challenges in management and protection. Journal of Vietnamese Environment, 9(1), 1-3.
- Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453.
- Dondapat, R., & Basariya, D. S. R. (2019). Consumer perception towards eco-friendly FMCG products and its influence on their purchase decision: An observed research. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(2), 1123-1128.
- Duan, J., Zhang, M., & Cheng, B. (2023). Study on consumers’ purchase intentions for carbon-labeled products. Sustainability, 15(2), 1116.
- Emberger-Klein, A., Schöps, J., & Menrad, K. (2021). The influence of climate attitudes and subjective and social norms on supermarket consumers’ intention toward climate-friendly food consumption. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5.
- Feucht, Y., & Zander, K. (2018). Consumers’ preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 740-748.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
- Gong, X., Zhang, K. Z. K., & Zhao, S. J. (2015). Halo effect on the adoption of mobile payment: A schema theory perspective. In M. Benyoucef, M. Weiss, & H. Mili (Eds.), E-Technologies. MCETECH 2015 (pp. 153-165). Springer.
- Grote, K. R., & Matheson, V. A. (2007). Examining the ‘Halo Effect’ in lotto games. Applied Economics Letters, 14(4), 307-310.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
- Ho, B. Q., Vu, K. H. N., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, H. T. T., Ho, D. M., Nguyen, H. N., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2020). Study loading capacties of air pollutant emissions for developing countries: A case of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5821.
- Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., & Ruzzier, M. K. (2019). Transition towards sustainability: Adoption of eco-products among consumers. Sustainability, 11(16), 4308.
- Hsu, M. H., Chang, C. M., & Chuang, L. W. (2015). Understanding the determinants of online repeat purchase intention and moderating role of habit: The case of online group-buying in Taiwan. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 45-56.
- Ji, M. F., & Wood, W. (2007). Purchase and consumption habits: Not necessarily what you intend. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 261-276.
- Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403.
- Kapoor, S., Fernandes, S., & Punia, S. (2022). ‘Natural’ label halo effect on consumer buying behavior, purchase intention and willingness to pay for skincare products. Cardiometry, 23, 741-755.
- Kato, T., Kishida, N., Umeyama, Y., Jin, Y., & Tsuda, K. (2020). A random extraction method with high market representation for online surveys. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 22(4), 569-584.
- Khalifa, M., & Liu, V. (2007). Online consumer retention: Contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 780-792.
- Khan, A., & Lan, Y. C. (2019). Attributes of carbon labelling to drive consumer purchase intentions. In A. Hu, M. Matsumoto, T. Kuo, & S. Smith (Eds.), Technologies and Eco-Innovation Towards Sustainability II (pp. 73-80). Springer.
- Khan, Z. A., Kamran, H., Bino, E., & Mahmood, M. (2021). Aesthetic typography of packaging design and purchase intention: A study of women shoppers of beauty products in Oman under ‘view’ model. FIIB Business Review.
- Khandpur, N., de Morais Sato, P., Mais, L. A., Martins, A. B., Spinillo, C. G., Garcia, M. T., Rojas, C. U., & Jaime, P. (2018). Are front-of-package warning labels more effective at communicating nutrition information than traffic-light labels? A randomized controlled experiment in a Brazilian sample. Nutrients, 10(6), 688.
- Khuong, M. N., & Tran, N. T. H. (2018). The impacts of product packaging elements on brand image and purchase intention – An empirical study of Phuc Long’s packaged tea products. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 9(1), 8-13.
- Kim, H., House, L. A., & Kim, T. K. (2016). Consumer perceptions of climate change and willingness to pay for mandatory implementation of low carbon labels: The case of South Korea. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 19(4), 129-144.
- Kim, N., & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: The moderating impact of situational context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5312.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principals and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
- Lee, H. K. H., Taddy, M., & Gray, G. A. (2010). Selection of a representative sample. Journal of Classification, 27(1), 41-53.
- Li, Q., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2017). Empirical study of the willingness of consumers to purchase low-carbon products by considering carbon labels: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 1237-1250.
- Li, S. Z., & Jain, A. (2009). Halo effect. In Encyclopedia of Biometrics (pp. 667-668). Springer.
- Liang, T. C., Situmorang, R. O. P., Liao, M. C., & Chang, S. C. (2020). The relationship of perceived consumer effectiveness, subjective knowledge, and purchase intention on carbon label products – A case study of carbon-labeled packaged tea products in Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(19), 7892.
- Liu, T., Wang, Q., & Su, B. (2016). A review of carbon labeling: Standards, implementation, and impact. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 68-79.
- Liu, Y., Yang, D., & Xu, H. (2017). Factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for low-carbon products: A simulation study in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 972-984.
- Lo Dinh, D. (2021). The impacts of transportation vehicles on environment: The case of Ho Chi Minh City. E3S Web of Conferences, 234, 00072.
- Masbullah, & Bahri, S. Y. (2022). Penggunaan Google Forms untuk pembuatan soal ujian sekolah di SMK lowis sakti [The use of Google Forms for school exam question creation at SMK Lowis Sakti]. ABDIKAN: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Sains Dan Teknologi, 1(2), 154-159. (In Indonesian).
- Mirabi, V., Akbariyeh, H., & Tahmasebifard, H. (2015). A study of factors affecting on customers purchase intention case study: The agencies of Bono Brand Tile in Tehran. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), 2(1).
- Nguyen-Viet, B. (2022). Understanding the influence of eco-label, and green advertising on green purchase intention: The mediating role of green brand equity. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 28(2), 87-103.
- Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250-256.
- Oh, M., & Ramaprasad, J. (2003). Halo effect: Conceptual definition and empirical exploration with regard to South Korean subsidiaries of US and Japanese multinational corporations. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 317-332.
- Okada, T., Tamaki, T., & Managi, S. (2019). Effect of environmental awareness on purchase intention and satisfaction pertaining to electric vehicles in Japan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 503-513.
- Omair, A. (2014). Sample size estimation and sampling techniques for selecting a representative sample. Journal of Health Specialties, 2(4), 142-147.
- Pham, M. T., Bui, N. K., & Puzirevsky, R. (2020). Legal framework for environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: The challenges between the regulations and practice. E3S Web of Conferences, 164, 11008.
- Ricci, E. C., & Banterle, A. (2020). Do major climate change-related public events have an impact on consumer choices? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109793.
- Röös, E., & Tjärnemo, H. (2011). Challenges of carbon labelling of food products: A consumer research perspective. British Food Journal, 113(8), 982-996.
- Shah, S. S. H., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A. R., Waris, S., & Ejaz, W. (2012). The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions. Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 105-110.
- Tang, Y. (2019). An empirical study of random sampling methods for changing discrete distributions (Master’s Thesis). University of Alberta.
- Thai Ha, L. (2020). Vietnam: Country report on children’s environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health, 35(1), 79-84.
- Thi Tra My, N. (2022, December 22). The impact of consumption-based economy on the vietnamese environment. Storia E Futuro, 56.
- Ul Haq, A., Kahloon, I. A., & Saleem, A. (2019). Impact of brand label on purchase intention of a customer. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 10(2(S)), 44-51.
- West, J. J., Cohen, A., Dentener, F., Brunekreef, B., Zhu, T., Armstrong, B., Bell, M. L., Brauer, M., Carmichael, G., Costa, D. L., Dockery, D. W., Kleeman, M., Krzyzanowski, M., Künzli, N., Liousse, C., Lung, S. C. C., Martin, R. V., Pöschl, U., Pope, C. A., … Wiedinmyer, C. (2016). What we breathe impacts our health: Improving understanding of the link between air pollution and health. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(10), 4895-4904.
- Woo, H. (2019). The expanded halo model of brand image, country image and product image in the context of three Asian countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(4), 773-790.
- Xu, N., & Xu, Y. (2022). Research on tacit knowledge dissemination of automobile consumers’ low-carbon purchase intention. Sustainability, 14(16), 10097.
- Yeo, S-F., Tan, C-L., Lim, K-B., & Khoo, Y-H. (2020). Product packaging: Impact on customers’ purchase intention. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 857864.
- Zhao, R., Geng, Y., Liu, Y., Tao, X., & Xue, B. (2018). Consumers’ perception, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: A case study of Chengdu in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1664-1671.
- Zhao, R., Yang, M., Liu, J., Yang, L., Bao, Z., & Ren, X. (2020). University students’ purchase intention and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled food products: A purchase decision-making experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7026.
- Zhou, S., Wang, H., Li, S., Chen, Y., & Wu, J. (2019). Carbon labels and “horizontal location effect”: Can carbon labels increase the choice of green product? Global Ecology and Conservation, 18, e00609.