What causes social media users to engage and mimic virtual influencers? The role of self-congruity
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.13
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #4, pp. 148-160
- Cited by
- 1468 Views
-
363 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Influencer marketing has been widely utilized in marketing communication. With the growing interest in virtual influencers, this study aims to investigate why social media users would interact with virtual influencers. The research model was developed based on the self-congruity theory. The data were obtained by questionnaires distributed to social media users using judgmental sampling (respondents were above 18 years old and actively used Instagram within the past six months). The questionnaire was posted on social media, and 230 responses were collected and analyzed using a covariance-based structural equation. Influencer-brand fit was found to have a weak direct effect on engagement (γ = 0.158, p < 0.05), but insignificant direct effect on mimicry desire (γ = 0.160, p > 0.05). Value homophily significantly affects both engagement and mimicry desire directly (β = 0.338 and β = 0.622, p < 0.01). Moreover, value homophily was found to fully mediate the virtual influencer-brand fit/mimicry desire relationship (B = 0.546, p < 0.01) and partially mediate the relationship of virtual influencer-brand fit/engagement (B = 0.229, p < 0.01). However, the mediating effect of mimicry desire on the virtual influencer-brand fit/engagement relationship was found to be non-significant (B = 0.065, p > 0.05). This study contributes to influencer marketing by highlighting value homophily as the most significant factor explaining why consumers respond to a virtual influencer when used as a message source in marketing communication.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M30, M31
-
References61
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Model fit of path analysis
-
- Table 1. Reliability and convergent validity of the constructs
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Total, direct, and indirect effects
-
- Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
- Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., Abd Majid, N., Foziah, H., Ismail, I., Al Halbusi, H., & Tehseen, S. (2021). Gain more insight from common latent factor in structural equation modeling. Journal of Physics, 1793, 012030.
- Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694.
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Building influencers’ credibility on Instagram: Effects on followers’ attitudes and behavioral responses toward the influencer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102585.
- Breves, P. L., Liebers, N., Abt, M., & Kunze, A. (2019). The perceived fit between Instagram influencers and the endorsed brand: How influencer–brand fit affects source credibility and persuasive effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 59(4), 440-454.
- Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of business research, 117, 510-519.
- Chartrand, T. L., & Dalton, A. N. (2009). Mimicry: Its ubiquity, importance, and functionality. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 458-483). Oxford University Press.
- Chen, K. J., Lin, J. S., & Shan, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing in China: The roles of parasocial identification, consumer engagement, and inferences of manipulative intent. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1436-1448.
- Choudhry, A., Han, J., Xu, X., & Huang, Y. (2022). I Felt a Little Crazy Following a Doll: Investigating Real Influence of Virtual Influencers on Their Followers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.
- Das, G., & Khatwani, G. (2018). E-tailer personality and behavioral intentions: The application of self-congruity theory. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(4), 283-297.
- De Cicco, R., Iacobucci, S., & Pagliaro, S. (2021). The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising, 40(5), 733-759.
- De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.
- Feng, Y., Chen, H., & Kong, Q. (2021). An expert with whom I can identify: the role of narratives in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 40(7), 972-993.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
- Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149-165.
- Hosany, S., Prayag, G., Martin, D., & Lee, W.-Y. (2013). Theory and strategies of anthropomorphic brand characters from Peter Rabbit, Mickey Mouse, and Ronald McDonald, to Hello Kitty. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 48-68.
- Islam, J. U., Rahman, Z., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2018). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a solicitation of congruity theory. Internet Research, 28(1), 23-45.
- Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. (2022). Influencer advertising on Instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 101-127.
- Jiradechakul, P. (2021). Digital Marketing – Thai Consumer 2020.
- Ki, C. W. C., & Kim, Y. K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing, 36(10), 905-922.
- Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2022). Social media influencers as human brands: an interactive marketing perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.
- Koo, W., Cho, E., & Kim, Y.-K. (2014). Actual and ideal self-congruity affecting consumers’ emotional and behavioral responses toward an online store. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 147-153.
- Kulesza, W., Szypowska, Z., Jarman, M. S., & Dolinski, D. (2014). Attractive chameleons sell: The mimicry-attractiveness link. Psychology & Marketing, 31(7), 549-561.
- Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027.
- Lee, J. K., Hansen, S. S., & Lee, S.-Y. (2020). The effect of brand personality self-congruity on brand engagement and purchase intention: The moderating role of self-esteem in Facebook. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2116-2128.
- Lee, S. S., Chen, H., & Lee, Y.-H. (2022). How endorser-product congruity and self-expressiveness affect Instagram micro-celebrities’ native advertising effectiveness. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(1), 149-162.
- Lee, S., & Jeong, M. (2014). Enhancing online brand experiences: An application of congruity theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 49-58.
- Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246.
- Monge-Benito, S., Elorriaga-Illera, A., & Olabarri-Fernández, E. (2020). YouTube celebrity endorsement: audience evaluation of source attributes and response to sponsored content. A case study of influencer Verdeliss. Communication & Society, 33(3), 149-166.
- Moustakas, E., Lamba, N., Mahmoud, D., & Ranganathan, C. (2020). Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security).
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101934.
- Patterson, P., Yu, T., & De Ruyter, K. (2006). Understanding customer engagement in services. Proceedings of ANZMAC 2006 conference. Brisbane.
- Portal, S., Abratt, R., & Bendixen, M. (2018). Building a human brand: Brand anthropomorphism unravelled. Business Horizons, 61(3), 367-374.
- Quester, P. G., Karunaratna, A., & Goh, L. K. (2000). Self-congruity and product evaluation: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(6), 525-535.
- Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344.
- Saima, & Khan, M. A. (2021). Effect of social media influencer marketing on consumers’ purchase intention and the mediating role of credibility. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(4), 503-523.
- Sands, S., Campbell, C. L., Plangger, K., & Ferraro, C. (2022a). Unreal influence: leveraging AI in influencer marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1721-1747.
- Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Demsar, V., & Chandler, G. (2022b). False idols: Unpacking the opportunities and challenges of falsity in the context of virtual influencers. Business Horizons, 65(6), 777-788.
- Schwarz, R. (2022, May 23). Should Marketers Leverage Virtual Influencers? Forbes.
- Shan, Y., Chen, K.-J., & Lin, J.-S. (2020). When social media influencers endorse brands: The effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 590-610.
- Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-Concept in Consumer Behaviour: A Critical Review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300.
- Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of business research, 13(3), 195-206.
- Sirgy, M. J., & Su, C. (2000). Destination image, self-congruity, and travel behavior: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 340-352.
- Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., Yu, G. B., Prebensen, N., Uysal, M., & Chen, J. (2018). Self-congruity theory in travel and tourism: another update. Creating Experience Value in Tourism, 57-69.
- Tafesse, W., & Wood, B. P. (2021). Followers’ engagement with instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102303.
- Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of service research, 13(3), 253-266.
- Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.
- Vijayakrishnan, V., Harikrishnan, D., Babu, D., & Kochi, A. V. V. (2018). Marketing Strategy in Advertisements Using Animated Characters. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(12), 2841-2852.
- Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122-146.
- White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2011). When imitation doesn’t flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 667-680.
- Wiedmann, K.-P., & von Mettenheim, W. (2021). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers’ winning formula? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(5), 707-725.
- Wille, L., Van Hoye, G., Weijters, B., Rangarajan, D., & Carpentier, M. (2018). To be yourself or to be your ideal self? Outcomes of potential applicants’ actual and ideal self-congruity perceptions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17(3), 107-119.
- Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of business research, 117, 543-556.
- Wu, S., Ren, M., Pitafi, A. H., & Islam, T. (2020). Self-image congruence, functional congruence, and mobile app intention to use. Mobile Information Systems, 1-17.
- Xiao, L., Saleem, A., Tariq, S. M., Ul Haq, J., & Guo, M. (2021). I wish I could Be like Her/Him! How self-congruence stimulates a desire to mimic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3025-3042.
- Xu, X., & Pratt, S. (2018). Social media influencers as endorsers to promote travel destinations: an application of self-congruence theory to the Chinese Generation Y. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(7), 958-972.
- Yang, K., Kim, H. M., & Tanoff, L. (2020). Signaling trust: Cues from Instagram posts. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, 100998.
- Zhang, M., Li, L., Ye, Y., Qin, K., & Zhong, J. (2020). The effect of brand anthropomorphism, brand distinctiveness, and warmth on brand attitude: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(5), 523-536.
- Zhou, S., Barnes, L., McCormick, H., & Blazquez Cano, M. (2021). Social media influencers’ narrative strategies to create eWOM: A theoretical contribution. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102293.