Examining relationship marketing and strategic branding in b2b Greek SMEs: A family business development
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(3).2022.10
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #3, pp. 110-120
- Cited by
- 680 Views
-
171 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Α survey of relationship marketing, branding, and the family business life cycle is conducted to determine the extent to which these variables ensure their path to the next generation. The study examines whether interpersonal relationships apply to family SME businesses and how they adopt relationship marketing as their main strategy. The study provides an insightful benchmarking approach between family businesses in early stage (1st and 2nd generation) and well-established (3rd and 4th generation) companies. In addition, the adopted branding process is examined. A qualitative method was chosen for the interviews with five B2B Greek family companies in the trading sector. Family businesses are Greek, have a known brand name, and family members are involved in the decision-making process. All participants agree that personal or friendly relationships of the owner-founder with customers, suppliers, and staff are crucial at the launch of businesses, and growth is a synonym for business survival. Data analysis revealed that relationship marketing is not related to the stages of development, as different perceptions were observed among participants of well-established and companies in the early stage. The results also show a significant relationship between different stages of family business’s development and branding strategies, documenting that owners of well-established family businesses focus on organizational structure and culture. In contrast, owners of family businesses in the early stage rely on personal relationships. Branding strategy seems to be the appropriate approach for a family-owned business to survive in the marketplace and have succeed pass on to the next generations.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M19, M31
-
References24
-
Tables1
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Relationship marketing to family businesses
- Figure 2. Brand from the family company point of view
- Figure 3. Is family business nature a condition of progress?
-
- Table 1. Sample characteristics
-
- Ashley-Cotleur, C., Kauanui, S. K., & Gaumer, C. J. (2013). Family business succession: The impact of customer relationship management and customer based brand equity on firm success or failure. Journal of Business Diversity, 13(1/2), 108-118.
- Beck, S. (2016). Brand management research in family firms: A structured review and suggestions for further research. Journal of Family Business Management, 6(3), 225-250.
- Binz Astrachan, C., & Botero, I.C. (2018). “We are a family firm”: An exploration of the motives for communicating the family business brand. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(1), 2-21.
- Cooper, J. M., Upton, N., & Seaman, S. (2005). Customer relationship management: A comparative analysis of family and non family business practices. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(3), 242-256.
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Duh, M., Tominc, P., & Rebernik, M. (2009). Growth ambitions and succession solutions in family business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(2), 256-269.
- Efferin, S., & Hartono, M. (2015). Management control and leadership styles in family business an Indonesian case study. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(1), 130-159.
- Jin, B., Yong Park, J., & Kim, J. (2008). Cross-cultural examination of the relationships among firm reputation, e-satisfaction, e-trust, and e-loyalty. International Marketing Review, 25(3), 324337.
- Jones, R. (2010). Corporate branding: The role of vision in implementing the corporate brand. Innovative Marketing, 6(1), 44-57.
- Hankinson, G. (2012). The measurement of brand orientation, its performance impact, and the role of leadership in the context of destination branding: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(7-8), 974-999.
- Kwon, J.-H., Jung, S.-H., Choi, H.-J., & Kim, J. (2021). Antecedent factors that affect restaurant brand trust and brand loyalty: Focusing on US and Korean consumers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(7), 990-1015.
- Neubauer, H. (2003). The dynamics of succession in family businesses in western European countries. Family Business Review, 16(4), 269-281.
- Motwani, J., Levenburg, N. M., Schwarz, T. V., & Blankson, C. (2006). Succession planning in SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Small Business Journal, 24(5), 471-495.
- Parmentier, M. A. (2011). When David met Victoria: Forging a strong family brand. Family Business Review, 24(3), 217-232.
- Pérez-Cabañero, C., González-Cruz, T., & Cruz-Ros, S. (2012). Do family SME managers value marketing capabilities’ contribution to firm performance? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(2), 116-142.
- Pimentel, D., Almeida, P., Marques-Quinteiro, P., & Sousa, M. (2021). Employer branding and psychological contract in family and non-family firms. Management Research, 19(3-4), 213-230.
- Samanta, I. (2009). The impact of e-customer relationship marketing in hotel industry. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 5(3/4), 333-346.
- Samanta, I. (2012). Exploring the factors of customer retention in mobile sector. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications (IJSITA), 3(2), 36-46.
- Senftlechner, D., & Hiebl, M. (2015). Management accounting and management control in family business. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(4), 573-606.
- Shen, A., & Tikoo, S. (2021). Family business identity, consumer product evaluations and firm size. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(7), 937-948.
- Smith, M. (2007). “Real” managerial differences between family and non family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 13(5), 278-295.
- Sreejesh, S., Sarkar, J. G., Sarkar, A., Eshghi, A., & Anusree, M. R. (2018). The impact of other customer perception on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 130-146.
- Terzidis, K., & Samanta, I. (2011). Marketing practices of small family business in Greece. Journal of Marketing and Operations Management Research, 1(1), 35-45.
- Tokarczyk, J., Hansen, E., Green, M., & Down, J. (2007). A resource based view and market orientation theory examination of the role of families in family business success. Family Business Review, 20(1), 17-31.
-
Multi-agent modeling and simulation of a stock market
Mohamed Amine Souissi
,
Khalid Bensaid ,
Rachid Ellaia
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.10
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 123-134 Views: 2248 Downloads: 1110 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe stock market represents complex systems where multiple agents interact. The complexity of the environment in the financial markets in general has encouraged the use of modeling by multi-agent platforms and particularly in the case of the stock market.
In this paper, an agent-based simulation model is proposed to study the behavior of the volume of market transactions. The model is based on the case of a single asset and three types of investor agents. Each investor can be a zero intelligent trader, fundamentalist trader or traders using historical information in the decision making process. The goal of the study is to simulate the behavior of a stock market according to the different considered endogenous and exogenous variables. -
Are bitcoin futures contracts for hedging or speculation?
Ramzi Nekhili 
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 1-9 Views: 1424 Downloads: 528 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe emerging interest in Bitcoin futures market has led to questions on its trading form and contribution to risk minimization. These questions are important for market participants, including hedgers and speculators. This paper addresses the possible trading motive in Bitcoin futures market in being speculation or hedging. The author first tests a model relating Bitcoin futures returns with trading volume and conditional volatility, estimated with a GJR-GARCH specification, on a full sample of daily futures prices. A robustness check is then conducted by investigating the hedging effectiveness of Bitcoin futures and the speculation-hedging ratios on individual Bitcoin futures contracts. The estimation results on Bitcoin futures contracts, spanning from December 2017 to February 2020, show a significant positive relationship between futures returns and lagged volume. The speculation-hedging measures used for Bitcoin futures contracts maturing in March, June, September, and December reveal an increasing demand for speculation. Also, the Bitcoin spot’s full-hedge and OLS-hedge strategies with Bitcoin futures provide no gain over a no-hedge strategy. The results reveal strong evidence that traders in the Bitcoin futures market are motivated by speculation rather than hedging. This further puts in evidence the existence of asymmetric information within informed traders in Bitcoin futures market, and therefore market participants would not insure their positions against Bitcoin price movements.
-
The relevance of relationship marketing model for hair salon’s competitiveness: a theoretical perspective
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 132-139 Views: 1411 Downloads: 1527 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯRelationship marketing (RM) concept seems to be best understood and embraced more by big business, while amongst myriad of small businesses it seems less prominent. This paper explores the need for RM as a determinant to hair salon’s competitiveness and growth. Hair industry in SA is declared a multi-billion dollar industry, their stagnation prompted this study. This paper contends that relationship building with customers has a profound effect on the inclination of a customer to return to the business. With the key variables of the relationship marketing model as the main determinants are namely service quality, customer satisfaction and customer retention. Increased practice of RM within this industry will enable owners to embrace entrepreneurial activities imperative for competitiveness, value creation and sustainability.
