Stimuli to adopt e-government services during Covid-19: Evidence from Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(1).2022.02
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #1, pp. 12-22
- Cited by
- 988 Views
-
390 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The goal of this study is to ascertain the critical elements affecting public acceptance and readiness to advocate electronic government services in Vietnam. An online survey was conducted among Vietnamese citizens. The chosen respondents had experience with e-government services. The analysis was utilized with the data gathered from 316 clean and legitimate responses. PLS-SEM analytic techniques and the SmartPLS program were adopted to execute analyzing processes. The findings indicate that three essential factors influenced the adoption of e-government services: (i) perceived service value, (ii) citizen e-empowerment, and (iii) fear of Covid-19. The perceived value of services, fear of Covid-19, and acceptance of e-government services all have a beneficial effect on citizen intention to recommend e-public services. This study suggested three practical implications: (a) leveraging the challenges of Covid-19 pandemic is to promote e-government services; (b) enhancing public service quality and informational quality is critical and vital to adopting e-government services, and (c) promoting citizen e-empowerment, outcomes, values, self-responsibility, and working procedures of e-public services to all citizens is necessary.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M38, O32, 038
-
References47
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Modeling results
-
- Table 1. Demographical analysis (n = 316)
- Table 2. Internal consistency reliability and convergent validity
- Table 3. Discriminant validity
- Table 4. R2, Q2, SRMR
- Table 5. Hypotheses testing
-
- Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C. Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119-128.
- Bellamy, C., & Taylor, J. A. (1998). Understanding government. Information infrastructure and policy, 6(1), 1-16.
- Castelnovo, W. (2013). A stakeholder-based approach to public value. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on eGovernment, 94-101.
- Chen, T. Y., Chang, P. L., & Yeh, C. W. (2004). A study of career needs, career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intentions of R&D personnel. Career development international, 9(4), 424-437.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2001). Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study. International journal of service industry management, 12(2), 184-207.
- El-Haddadeh, R., Osmani, M., Hindi, N., & Fadlalla, A. (2021). Value creation for realising the sustainable development goals: Fostering organisational adoption of big data analytics. Journal of Business Research, 131, 402-410.
- Ergeneli, A., Arı, G. S., & Metin, S. (2007). Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers. Journal of business research, 60(1), 41-49.
- Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2007). Towards the ’perfect’ customer experience. Journal of Brand Management, 15(2), 89-101.
- Füller, J. (2010). Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California management review, 52(2), 98-122.
- Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134-148.
- Gronemus, J. Q., Hair, P. S., Crawford, K. B., Nyalwidhe, J. O., Cunnion, K. M., & Krishna, N. K. (2010). Potent inhibition of the classical pathway of complement by a novel C1q-binding peptide derived from the human astrovirus coat protein. Molecular immunology, 48(1-3), 305-313.
- Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European business review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Halvorsrud, R., Kvale, K., & Følstad, A. (2016). Improving service quality through customer journey analysis. Journal of service theory and practice, 26(6), 840-867.
- Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government information quarterly, 23(1), 97-122.
- Jaradat, M. I. R. M., Moustafa, A. A., & Al-Mashaqba, A. M. (2018). Exploring perceived risk, perceived trust, perceived quality and the innovative characteristics in the adoption of smart government services in Jordan. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(4), 399-439.
- Kim, H. W., & Gupta, S. (2014). A user empowerment approach to information systems infusion. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(4), 656-668.
- Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. Electronic Journal of E-government, 5(1).
- Lean, O. K., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. International journal of information management, 29(6), 458-475.
- Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197.
- Lu, L., Lu, A. C. C., Gursoy, D., & Neale, N. R. (2016). Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 737-761.
- K., & Zahide, F. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.
- Mensah, I. K. (2019). Factors influencing the intention of university students to adopt and use e-government services: An empirical evidence in China. SAGE Open, 9(2).
- Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press.
- Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology & People, 32(2), 364-386.
- Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The electronic journal of information systems in developing countries, 18(1), 1-24.
- OECD. (2019). Strengthening Digital Government.
- Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in human behavior, 61, 404-414.
- Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government information quarterly, 29(1), 98-109.
- Peterson, N. A. (2014). Empowerment theory: Clarifying the nature of higher-order multidimensional constructs. American journal of community psychology, 53(1-2), 96-108.
- Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208.
- Rehman, M., Esichaikul, V., & Kamal, M. (2012). Factors influencing e-government adoption in Pakistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(3), 258-282.
- Shankar, A., & Datta, B. (2018). Factors affecting mobile payment adoption intention: An Indian perspective. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S72-S89.
- Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government information quarterly, 28(1), 17-35.
- Sjoberg, F. M., Mellon, J., & Peixoto, T. (2017). The effect of bureaucratic responsiveness on citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 340-351.
- Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
- Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
- Turunen, L. L. M., Cervellon, M. C., & Carey, L. D. (2020). Selling second-hand luxury: Empowerment and enactment of social roles. Journal of Business Research, 116, 474-481.
- Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government information quarterly, 36(2), 167-178.
- United Nations. (2020). The Impact of Digital Technologies.
- Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In E. V. Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47-82). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government information quarterly, 25(4), 717-733.
- Wilder-Smith, A., & Freedman, D. O. (2020). Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Journal of travel medicine, 27(2), taaa020.
- Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of community psychology, 16(5), 725-750.