Specification of the relationship between the sales expenses and the sales in Jordanian companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(4).2019.05
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2019, Issue #4, pp. 57-65
- Cited by
- 879 Views
-
296 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Traditional accounting has divided costs into variable and fixed costs, with changes made according to production levels, consequently, the cost behavior changes according to changes in the volume of production activity. Therefore, it has become necessary for successful management to understand cost behavior to face market changes and to adopt strategies that increase sales volume.
The study period covered 12 years between 2006 and 2017. The study population was from Jordanian industrial shareholding companies. Using the regression models, the main results indicated that sales expenses could not explain changes in sales revenue in Jordanian companies; there was a significant relationship between sales expense changes and sales revenues, with sales expense changes having incremental information content over sales expense levels in explaining sales revenues. There was also no significant relationship between sales expense levels, sales expense changes, and sales revenues. The study suggests that future researches should be made in order to obtain business-oriented and specific information on how the decisions affect sales behavior. Overall, the study findings enhance our understanding about companies’ cost behavior and provide useful insights into financial and management accounting literature.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M31, D41
-
References17
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Literature review summary
- Table 2. Variable type, computation and denomination
- Table 3. Descriptive measures
- Table 4. Correlation matrix
- Table 5. Model 1 results
- Table 6. Model 2 results
- Table 7. Model 3 results
-
- Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63.
- Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. Y. (2016). The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(1), 203-220.
- Bosch, J., Blandon, J., Ravenda, D., Silva, M., & Somozo, A. (2017). The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness. Estudios de Economía, 44(1), 81-104.
- Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248-261.
- Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282.
- Cheung, C., Kim, H., Kim, S., & Kim, B. (2014). The Effect of Industry Characteristics on Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Korean Accounting Journal, 23(6), 429-456.
- Da Silva, A., Costa, V., Magro, C. B. D., & Klann, R. (2019). Sticky Costs Behavior and Earnings Management. Brazilian Business Review, 16(2), 191-206.
- Dalla Via, N., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behavior: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting & Finance, 54(3), 753-778.
- Gavalas, D., & Syriopoulos, T. (2019). How Sticky Are the Costs? Evidence from the Shipping Industry. International Journal of Accounting and Finance Studies, 2(1), 1-16.
- He, D., Teruya, J., & Shimizu, T. (2010). Sticky selling, general and administrative cost behavior and its changes in Japan. Global Journal of Business Research, 4(4), 1-10.
- Horngren, Srikant, M., & Madhav, V. (2017). Cost Accounting: an Managerial Emphasis (16th ed.).
- Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201-224.
- Marques, A. V. C., Santos, C. K. S., Lima, F. D. C., & de Souza Costa, P. (2014). Cost stickiness in Latin American open companies from 1997 to 2012. European Scientific Journal, 10(10), 270-282.
- Porporato, M., & Werbin, E. (2010). Active cost management in banks: evidence of sticky costs in Argentina, Brazil and Canada. AAA Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper.
- Shim, J. K. (2016). Accounting and Finance for the Nonfinancial Executive: An Integrated Resource Management Guide for the 21st Century. CRC Press.
- Subramaniam, C., & Weidenmier, M. L. (2016). Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Cost. Advances in Management Accounting, 26, 275-305.
- Weiss, D. (2010) Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441-1471.