Biogas as an alternative energy resource for Ukrainian companies: EU experience
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.14(2).2018.01
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2018, Issue #2, pp. 7-15
- Cited by
- 1306 Views
-
203 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The paper deals with analysis of the preconditions of alternative energy market development in Ukraine. In this case study, the authors analyzed the EU experience. The results of analysis showed that the leader of the EU countries in renewable energy has already achieved the target (20%), which had been indicated. In addition, the findings showed that the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption has been increasing from year to year. The authors allocate that, according to the Ukrainian potential, biogas is the most perspective one among alternative resources. Moreover, results of analysis showed that Ukraine has the huge potential of agricultural sector. In this direction, the authors allocated the main types of the agricultural activities, which have the highest potential of biogas production: sugar factories, corn silage and poultry farms. The authors underlined that biogas spreading is restrained by the stereotypes that green investments are not attractive for investors. In order to analyze the economic efficiency of investments to the biogas installation, the authors calculated the profit from the biogas installation for poultry farm. The authors made two scenarios for calculation. The first – the whole volume of energy, which was generated from the biogas unit, will be sold with feed-in tariff. The second – the farm covers its own needs in electricity, the rest will be sold with feed-in tariff. The findings showed that the first scenario is more attractive. Moreover, the farm could receive higher profit if it installed the biogas in 2016, not in 2017. In addition, based on the EU experience and features of farm functioning, the authors approved that the biogas installation has not only the economic effect (profit and additional profit) for company, but also ecological and social effects for rural area, where this farm was located.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M30, Q28, Q48
-
References43
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Fig. 1. Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in EU
- Fig. 2. Environmental, social and economic benefits from biogas production at the poultry farm “Avis Ukraine”
-
- Table 1. Dynamics of share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in the EU countries
- Table 2. Growth rate of share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in the EU countries
- Table 3. The Ukrainian indicative goals of biomass in gross energy consumption by 2020
- Table 4. The dynamics of waste in Ukraine (2011–2016)
- Table 5. The potential of biogas production in Ukrainian agriculture
- Table 6. The estimated costs of installation the biogas unit and equipment
- Table 7. The estimated productivity of biogas unit
- Table 8. The findings for the first scenario for years 2016–2017
- Table 9. The findings for the second scenario for years 2016–2017 year
- Table 10. The findings: estimated profit and loss of opportunities, EUR
-
- Aliyeva, O. (Ed.) (2017). By 2050 Ukraine can increase the share of its «green» energy up to 91% – research shows.
- Angelis-Dimakis, A., Biberacher, M., Dominguez, J., Fiorese, G., Gadocha, S., Gnansounou, E., ... & Robba, M. (2011). Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(2), 1182-1200.
- BalticSea2020 (n.d.). Draft Prospect: Turn Ing Pig Manure from Waste to Asset.
- Bioenergy Association of Ukraine (2016). Manual “Preparation and Implementation of projects on natural gas substitution with biomass in heat energy production in Ukraine”.
- Buczkowski, R., Igliński, B., Iglińska, A., Kujawski, W., Cichosz, M. (2011, August). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Bioenergy in Poland, 15(6), 2999-3007.
- Budzianowski, W. M., & Postawa, K. (2017). Renewable energy from biogas with reduced carbon dioxide footprint: Implications of applying different plant configurations and operating pressures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 852-868.
- Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2017). Energy democracy: goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 35-48.
- Callaway, D. S., Fowlie, M., & McCormick, G. (2018). Location, location, location: The variable value of renewable energy and demand-side efficiency resources. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 5(1), 39-75.
- Cebula, J., & Pimonenko, T. (2015). Comparison Financing Conditions of the Development Biogas Sector in Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Ecology & Development, 30(2), 20-30.
- Chygryn, O. (2016). The Mechanism of the Resource-Saving Activity at Joint Stock Companies: The Theory and Implementation Features. International Journal of Ecology & Development, 31(3), 42-59.
- Colmenar-Santos, A., Monzón-Alejandro, O., Borge-Diez, D., Castro-Gil, M. (2013, December). The impact of different grid regulatory scenarios on the development of renewable energy on islands: A comparative study and improvement proposals. Renewable Energy, 60, 302-312.
- Demers, A. (2009). The war at home: consequences of loving a veteran of the Iraq and Afghan wars. The Internet Journal of Mental Health, 6(1).
- Dudchenko, O. (n.d.). The Alternative energy resources in the Ukrainian Black Sea. Policy Brief.
- Epravda (2013). Biogas production prospects in Ukraine.
- European Commission (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Energy Roadmap 2050.
- Eurostat (n.d.). Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption.
- Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear safety. RES Legal.
- Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2014). Bioenergy in Germany: Facts and Figures.
- Gasparatos, A., Doll, C. N., Esteban, M., Ahmed, A., & Olang, T. A. (2017). Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 161-184.
- Geletukha, G., Kiva, O., Matveev, Yu., Oliynyk, Ye., Sysoiev, M. (2013). Second position paper “Analysis of the Law of Ukraine “On amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Electricity” N5485-VI of 20.11.2012.
- Geletukha, G., Kucheruk, P., Matveev, Y. (2013). Official website Bioenergy Association of Ukraine Official materials Bioenergy Association of Ukraine. The Prospects of Biogas Production and Use in Ukraine (Position Paper N4. May 31, 2013).
- Geletukha, G., Zheliezna, T. (2012). First position paper “Position of bioenergy in the draft updated Energy Strategy of Ukraine till 2030”.
- Geletukha, G., Zheliezna, T. (2013). Third position paper “Barriers to the development of bioenergy in Ukraine”.
- Grant, D., & Vasi, I. B. (2017). Civil Society in an Age of Environmental Accountability: How Local Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations Reduce US Power Plants’ Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Sociological Forum, 32(1), 94-115.
- IEA Bioenergy (2016). Annual report 2015.
- Iglinskin, B., Buczkowski, R., Iglinska, A., Cichosz, M., Piechota, G., Kujawski, W. (2012, September). Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economic and environmental aspects, biogas potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4890-4900.
- Krjaklina, I. (2012). Justification economic efficiency of biogas plant.
- Law of Ukraine “About electric power industry” from 16.10.1997 No. 575/97-ВР, edition of 07.16.2015, the base 514-19.
- Melnyk, L. G. (2016). Instruments and key factors of sustainable (“green”) economy formation. Actual Problems of Economics, 178(4), 30-36.
- Fachwerband BIOGAS. German Biogas Association, “Biowaste to Biogas”.
- Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine (2012, January). Statement on Security of Energy Supply of Ukraine. Kyiv.
- National Project “Biomass energy”.
- National Renewable Energy Action Plan for the period up to 2020.
- Official website Center of biogas technology.
- Prokopenko, O., Cebula, J., Chayen, S., & Pimonenko, T. (2017). Wind energy in Israel, Poland and Ukraine: Features and opportunities. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 32(1), 98-107.
- Rafindadi, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1130-1141.
- State Agency on Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine (2015). REMAP – 2030. Prospects of renewable energy development in Ukraine 2030.
- State Agency on Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine (n.d.). Bioenergy.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Energy balance of Ukraine 2010–2017.
- United Nations (2017). Report of the Secretary-General, “Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals”, E/2017/66.
- World Energy Council (2013). World Energy Resources.
- Yasar, A., Nazir, S., Tabinda, A. B., Nazar, M., Rasheed, R., & Afzaal, M. (2017). Socio-economic, health and agriculture benefits of rural household biogas plants in energy scarce developing countries: A case study from Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 108, 19-25.
- Yevtushenko. S., Vakh, V. (n.d.). State Agency for Investment and National Projects of Ukraine. Renewable energy in Ukraine.