Assessing risk allocation and compensation readiness in Vietnam’s post-2025 nuclear liability framework
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(3).2026.01
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #3, pp. 1-10
- 16 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Vietnam’s revived nuclear power program creates an environmental economics problem because accident externalities, restoration obligations, and delayed compensation can shift costs from operators to affected communities, ecosystems, and public budgets. This study aims to assess the environmental and economic risk allocation and compensation readiness of Vietnam’s post-2025 nuclear liability framework against modern international nuclear liability benchmarks. A doctrinal and comparative method is applied to Law No. 94/2025/QH15, Decree No. 332/2025/ND-CP, Decision No. 768/QD-TTg, the 1997 Vienna Convention, and IAEA materials, using legal and policy data for 2025–2026 updated through April 2026. The results show that Vietnam fully aligns with five of seven benchmark elements and partially aligns with two. The aligned elements perform four economic functions: channeling concentrates claims and insurance demand in one operator; strict liability internalizes prevention and accident costs; seven compensable heads cover death, health injury, property loss, direct economic loss, environmental restoration, environmental-use income loss, preventive measures, and residual economic loss; and 30-year/10-year limitation periods protect latent claims. The monetary architecture requires 150 million SDR of operator financial security for nuclear power plants, 5 million SDR for other installations and transport, a 300 million SDR total compensation floor per incident, and a state top-up for shortfalls. The terrorism defense and missing treaty-based cross-border procedure remain partial gaps. The study concludes that Vietnam has a domestic platform for cost internalization, but full environmental and economic compensation readiness depends on treaty accession, valuation rules for environmental damage, and operational financing of claims.
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q58, Q51, K32, K13
-
References43
-
Tables1
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Environmental and economic risk allocation assessment of Vietnam’s post-2025 nuclear liability framework
-
- Abraham, M. (2014). Nuclear liability: A key component of the public policy decision to deploy nuclear energy in Southeast Asia. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
- Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2008). Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 317-344.
- Bellamy, J. (2019). Civil liability for nuclear damage in countries developing nuclear new build programmes. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 12(1), 108-120.
- Calabresi, G. (1970). The costs of accidents: A legal and economic analysis. Yale University Press.
- Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
- Faure, M., & Liu, J. (2012). The tsunami of March 2011 and the subsequent nuclear incident at Fukushima: Who compensates the victims? William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 37(1), 129-218.
- Freeman, A. M. III, Herriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Gioia, A. (2025). Nuclear liability revisited. Yearbook of International Disaster Law, 6(1), 11-50.
- Government of Vietnam. (2025). Decree No. 332/2025/ND-CP detailing the Law on Atomic Energy regarding radiation and nuclear safety. (In Vietnamese).
- Greenberg, M., & Lowrie, K. (2023). Kristin Shrader-Frechette: Confronting environmental injustice. Risk Analysis, 43(7), 1301-1309.
- Grover, R. B. (2024). The civil liability for Nuclear Damage Act of India: A critical perspective regarding the supplier’s liability. In S. Misra (Ed.), Indian practice of international law: Global norms and their domestic enforcement (pp. 175-196). Routledge.
- Gudgel, J. E. (2023). Insurance and the public-private management of risk at US commercial nuclear power plants. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 26(4), 437-465.
- Heffron, R. J., Ashley, S. F., & Nuttall, W. J. (2016). The global nuclear liability regime post Fukushima Daiichi. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 90, 1-10.
- IAEA Office of Legal Affairs. (2026). Country fact sheet: Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (1997). Consolidated text of the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage of 21 May 1963 as amended by the Protocol of 12 September 1997.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2013, October 22). Vietnam deposits instrument of accession to Joint Convention on Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on Safety of Radioactive Waste Management.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2017). Civil liability for nuclear damage: Advantages and disadvantages of joining the international nuclear liability regime.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2020a). Legal framework on civil liability for nuclear damage.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2020b). The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage: Explanatory texts.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2022). Climate change and nuclear power 2022.
- Kyne, D., & Bolin, B. (2016). Emerging environmental justice issues in nuclear power and radioactive contamination. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(7), Article 700.
- Louaas, A., & Picard, P. (2022). Optimal nuclear liability insurance. The Energy Journal, 43(1), 97-115.
- McRae, B. (2015). Entry into force of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage: Opening the umbrella. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 95, 7-26.
- Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam. (2026, March 24). Vietnam and Russia officially commit to nuclear power development.
- Nagato, T. (2019). Tax losses and excessive risk taking under limited liability: A case study of the TEPCO bailout after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 32(2), 139-180.
- Nam-Speers, J., Berry, F. S., & Choi, D. (2023). Examining the role of perceived risk and benefit, shared concern for nuclear stigmatization, and trust in governments in shaping citizen risk acceptability of a nuclear power plant. The Social Science Journal, 60(4), 695-714.
- National Assembly of Vietnam. (2024). Resolution No. 174/2024/QH15 dated November 30, 2024 on the 8th session of the 15th National Assembly. LuatVietnam.
- National Assembly of Vietnam. (2025). Law No. 94/2025/QH15 on Atomic Energy. LuatVietnam.
- Nguyen, V. D., Ha, D. D., Nguyen, T. H. T., & Nguyen, D. H. (2025). Generation expansion planning toward net zero target considering co-firing green fuel, CCUS installation and early decommissioning in thermal power plants: A case study of Vietnam. AIMS Energy, 13(3), 540-568.
- Nowakowska, P. (2024). Legal mechanisms influencing the scalability (measurability) of nuclear liability risk for operators within the Polish legal framework. Prawo i Więź, 53(6).
- OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). (2022). Principles and practice of international nuclear law. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2018, June 25). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Further developments and policy use. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan.
- Pisi, S. K. (2023). The modern nuclear liability regime’s concept of ‘environmental damage’: How national courts may apply it and what remedies they may provide for such damage. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 111, 23-56.
- Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2025). Decision No. 768/QD-TTg approving the adjustment of the national power development master plan for the 2021-2030 period, with a vision toward 2050. LuatVietnam.
- Roland, V. J. H. (2023). Applicability of the existing nuclear liability conventions to different types of small modular reactors currently under development. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 110, 7-36.
- Saenko, V., Ivanov, V., Tsyb, A., Bogdanova, T., Tronko, M., Demidchik, Y., & Yamashita, S. (2011). The Chernobyl accident and its consequences. Clinical Oncology, 23(4), 234-243.
- Shavell, S. M. (1984). Liability for harm versus regulation of safety. Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 357-374.
- Stoiber, C., Baer, A., Pelzer, N., & Tonhauser, W. (2003). Handbook on nuclear law. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
- Stoiber, C., Cherf, A., Tonhauser, W., & De Lourdes Vez Carmona, M. (2010). Handbook on nuclear law: Implementing legislation. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
- Toropchin, G. V. (2025). History and prospects of nuclear power in Vietnam. The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 9(1), 54-66.
- Trebilcock, M., & Winter, R. A. (1997). The economics of nuclear accident law. International Review of Law and Economics, 17(2), 215-243.
- Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 5-76.


