The impact of agricultural value added and biomass energy consumption on Vietnam’s environmental quality
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.13
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2024, Issue #2, pp. 185-197
- 71 Views
-
13 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the impact of biomass energy consumption, agricultural value added, raw material productivity, and gross domestic product growth rate on Vietnam’s environmental quality within the framework of the load capacity curve hypothesis over the period from 1986 to 2021. The analysis employs ARDL estimation and Granger causality tests to examine correlations. The results proved that agricultural value added and biomass energy are critical long-term drivers of environmental quality in Vietnam. The long-term estimation results suggest that a 1% increase in biomass energy consumption contributes to a marginal increase of 0.82% in the load capacity factor. In addition, agricultural value added appears to have a significant diminishing effect on the load capacity factor in Vietnam (an increase of 1% in agriculture value added versus a reduction of the load capacity factor by 2.28%). The study unveils a bidirectional relationship between biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor. These findings suggest that in Vietnam, biomass energy consumption improves environmental quality. In turn, improved environmental quality will promote biomass energy consumption.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, O13, Q15, Q56
-
References52
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Load capacity factor
- Figure 2. Variation of variables
- Figure 3. Stability test of the CUSUM and CUSUMSQ models
-
- Table 1. Data sources
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Unit root test results
- Table 4. ARDL bounds test results
- Table 5. Estimated results
- Table 6. Summary of the model tests
- Table 7. Granger causality test
-
- Akhayere, E., Kartal, M. T., Adebayo, T. S., & Kavaz, D. (2023). Role of energy consumption and trade openness towards environmental sustainability in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 21156-21168.
- Alhashim, R., Deepa, R., & Anandhi, A. (2021). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production using LCA: A review. Climate, 9(11), Article 164.
- Alola, A. A., Özkan, O., & Usman, O. (2023). Role of non-renewable energy efficiency and renewable energy in driving environmental sustainability in India: Evidence from the load capacity factor hypothesis. Energies, 16(6), Article 2847.
- Anwar, M. A., Arshed, N., & Tiwari, A. K. (2023). Nexus between biomass energy, economic growth, and ecological footprints: Empirical investigation from belt and road initiative economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(54), 115527-115542.
- Awosusi, A. A., Eweade, B. S., & Ojekemi, O. S. (2024). Analyzing the environmental role of resource efficiency, economic globalization, and biomass usage in Malaysia: A time-varying causal approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
- Awosusi, A. A., Kutlay, K., Altuntaş, M., Khodjiev, B., Agyekum, E. B., Shouran, M., Elgbaily, M., & Kamel, S. (2022). A roadmap toward achieving sustainable environment: Evaluating the impact of technological innovation and globalization on load capacity factor. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), Article 3288.
- Aziz, N., Sharif, A., Raza, A., & Rong, K. (2020). Revisiting the role of forestry, agriculture, and renewable energy in testing environment Kuznets curve in Pakistan: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(9), 10115-10128.
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Driha, O. M., Bekun, F. V., & Osundina, O. A. (2019). Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 25218-25234.
- Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and non-renewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023-1029.
- Bilgili, F., Öztürk, I., Kocak, E., Bulut, U., Pamuk, Y., Mugaloglu, E., & Baglıtas, H. H. (2016). The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A Wavelet coherence approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(19), 19043-19061.
- Boluk, G., & Karaman, S. (2024). The impact of agriculture, energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: Testing the agricultureinduced EKC for Türkiye. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(4), 99-107.
- Cetin, M. A., Bakirtas, I., & Yildiz, N. (2022). Does agriculture-induced environmental Kuznets curve exist in developing countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(23), 34019-34037.
- Chowdhury, S., Khan, S., Sarker, M. F. H., Islam, M. K., Tamal, M. A., & Khan, N. A. (2022). Does agricultural ecology cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Heliyon, 8(6), Article e09750.
- Destek, M. A., Sarkodie, S. A., & Asamoah, E. F. (2021). Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 149, Article 106076.
- Domenech, T., & Bahn-Walkowiak, B. (2019). Transition towards a resource efficient circular economy in Europe: Policy lessons from the EU and the member states. Ecological Economics, 155, 7-19.
- Fareed, Z., Salem, S., Adebayo, T. S., Pata, U. K., & Shahzad, F. (2021). Role of export diversification and renewable energy on the load capacity factor in Indonesia: A Fourier quantile causality approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, Article 770152.
- Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438.
- Huilan, W., Akadiri, S. S., Haouas, I., Awosusi, A. A., & Odu, A. T. (2024). Impact of trade liberalization and renewable energy on load capacity factor: Evidence from novel dual adjustment approach. Energy & Environment, 35(2), 795-814.
- International Resource Panel. (n.d.). Global Material Flows Database.
- IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kirwan, M. L., Megonigal, J. P., Noyce, G. L., & Smith, A. J. (2023). Geomorphic and ecological constraints on the coastal carbon sink. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(6), 393-406.
- Koshta, N., Bashir, H. A., & Samad, T. A. (2021). Foreign trade, financial development, agriculture, energy consumption and CO2 emission: Testing EKC among emerging economies. Indian Growth and Development Review, 14(1), 50-80.
- Liu, Z., Saydaliev, H. B., Lan, J., Ali, S., & Anser, M. K. (2022). Assessing the efectiveness of biomass energy in mitigating CO2 emissions: Evidence from top-10 biomass energy consumer countries. Renewable Energy, 191, 842-851.
- Mehmood, U. (2022). Biomass energy consumption and its impacts on ecological footprints: Analyzing the role of globalization and natural resources in the framework of EKC in SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17513-17519.
- Muoneke, O. B., Okere, K. I., & Nwaeze, C. N. (2022). Agriculture, globalization, and ecological footprint: the role of agriculture beyond the tipping point in the Philippines. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(36), 54652-54676.
- Naseem, S., Ji, T. G., & Kashif, U. (2020). Asymmetrical ARDL correlation between fossil fuel energy, food security, and carbon emission: Providing fresh information from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31369-31382.
- Olanipekun, I. O., Olasehinde-Williams, G. O., & Alao, R. O. (2019). Agriculture and environmental degradation in Africa: The role of income. Science of the Total Environment, 692, 60-67.
- Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (ILO Working paper No. WEP2-22/WP.238). Geneva: International Labour Office.
- Parajuli, R., Joshi, O., & Maraseni, T. (2019). Incorporating forests, agriculture, and energy consumption in the framework of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A dynamic panel data approach. Sustainability, 11(9), Article 2688.
- Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Adebayo, T. S., & Ullah, S. (2023). Enhancing environmental quality in the United States by linking biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(3), Article 101531.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
- Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022). Dynamic impacts of economic growth, energy use, urbanization, agricultural productivity, and forested area on carbon emissions: New insights from Kazakhstan. World Development Sustainability, 1, 100019.
- Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022a). The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, agricultural land expansion, and carbon emissions: New insights from Peru. Energy Nexus, 6, Article 100067.
- Raihan, A., & Tuspekova, A. (2022b). Dynamic impacts of economic growth, renewable energy use, urbanization, industrialization, tourism, agriculture, and forests on carbon emissions in Turkey. Carbon Research, 1, Article 20.
- Raihan, A., Muhtasim, D. A., Farhana, S., Rahman, M., Hasan, M. A. U., Paul, A., & Faruk, O. (2023a). Dynamic linkages between environmental factors and carbon emissions in Thailand. Environmental Processes, 10, Article 5.
- Raihan, A., Rahman, J., Tanchangya, T., Ridwan, M., Rahman, M. S., & Islam, S. (2024). A review of the current situation and challenges facing Egyptian renewable energy technology. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy, 3(3), 29-52.
- Raihan, A., Rashid, M., Voumik, L. C., Akter, S., & Esquivias, M. A. (2023b). The dynamic impacts of economic growth, financial globalization, fossil fuel, renewable energy, and urbanization on load capacity factor in Mexico. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13462.
- Shah, M. I., AbdulKareem, H. K., Khan, Z., & Abbas, S. (2022). Examining the agriculture induced Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in BRICS economies: The role of renewable energy as a moderator. Renewable Energy, 198, 343-351.
- Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F., & Ortega, E. (2010). Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3182-3192.
- Sulaiman, C., Abdul-Rahim, A. S., & Ofozor, C. A. (2020). Does wood biomass energy use reduce CO2 emissions in European Union member countries? Evidence from 27 members. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119996.
- Uche, E., & Ngepah, N. (2024). How green-technology, energy-transition and resource rents influence load capacity factor in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43(1), 2281038.
- Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., & Alola, A. A. (2021). The imperativeness of environmental quality in the United States transportation sector amidst biomass-fossil energy consumption and growth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, Article 124863.
- Usman, M., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2021). What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development. Renewable Energy, 179, 12-28.
- Usman, M., Anwar, S., Yaseen, M. R., Makhdum, M. S. A., Kousar, R., & Jahanger, A. (2022). Unveiling the dynamic relationship between agriculture value addition, energy utilization, tourism and environmental degradation in South Asia. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), Article e2712.
- Usman, O., Ozkan, O., Adeshola, I., & Eweade, B. S. (2024). Analysing the nexus between clean energy expansion, natural resource extraction, and load capacity factor in China: a step towards achieving COP27 targets. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
- Wang, K., Wu, M., Sun, Y., Shi, X., Sun, A., & Zhang, P. (2019). Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China. Resources Policy, 60, 203-214.
- World Bank Group (WDI). (n.d.). DataBank. World Development Indicators.
- Xuan, T. H., & Hung, T. N. (2024). Mối quan hệ giữa tiêu thụ năng lượng, độ mở thương mại, phát triển tài chính và chất lượng môi trường tại Việt Nam [The relationship between energy consumption, trade openness, financial development and environmental quality in Vietnam]. Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển – Journal of Economics and Development, (320), 2-12. (In Vietnamese).
- Yang, M., Magazzino, C., Awosusi, A. A., & Abdulloev, N. (2024). Determinants of load capacity factor in BRICS countries: A panel data analysis. Natural Resources Forum, 48(2), 525-548.
- Yurtkuran, S. (2021). The efect of agriculture, renewable energy production, and globalization on CO2 emissions in Turkey: A bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable Energy, 171, 1236-1245.
- Zafar, M. W., Sinha, A., Ahmed, Z., Qin, Q., & Zaidi, S. A. H. (2021). Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, Article 110868.
- Zhang, S., Ramzan, M., Awosusi, A. A., Eweade, B. S., & Ojekemi, O. S. (2024). Unraveling causal dynamics: Exploring resource efficiency and biomass utilization in Malaysia’s context. Renewable Energy, 226, Article 120368.