1998-60411998-605X
Business Perspectives
  • Login

Editorial office contact form

Please complete all required fields!

Please specify your request here

Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Captcha Refresh Invalid data

Your request has been successfully sent.

Your Cart

Price Total
€0.00

(₴0)

Proceed to Checkout
Your cart is empty
Cart 0 Items
Submit Manuscript
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publishing policies
  • Editorial Policies
  • Books
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Environmental Economics
  • Issue #2
  • Environmental, social, and governance performance: The role of Chinese employee stock ownership plans

Environmental, social, and governance performance: The role of Chinese employee stock ownership plans

  • Received April 2, 2024;
    Accepted October 7, 2024;
    Published October 17, 2024
  • Author(s)
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5119-0486
    Yasi Liu
    ORCID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3363-2307
    Shaun McDowell
    ORCID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5914-6974
    Chunxiao Xue
    ORCID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-0733
    Jianing Zhang
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.10
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2024, Issue #2, pp. 132-148
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    7 articles
    Journal title: Journal of Risk and Financial Management
    Article title: Top Management Team Educational Background and Stock Liquidity: Evidence from China
    DOI: 10.3390/jrfm18100564
    Volume: 18 / Issue: 10 / First page: 564 / Year: 2025
    Contributors: Jingyu Wu, Shaun McDowell, Cagri Berk Onuk, Jianing Zhang
    Journal title: Public and Municipal Finance
    Article title: Public and fiscal policy instruments for supporting renewable electricity development: Evidence from a cross-country study
    DOI: 10.21511/pmf.14(3).2025.06
    Volume: 14 / Issue: 3 / First page: 74 / Year: 2025
    Contributors: Alina Raboshuk, Ruslan Serhiienko, Iuliia Myroshnychenko, Dmytro Kobylnik, Alla Moroz, Serhiy Lyeonov
    Journal title: Human Technology
    Article title: Does AI vibrancy reshape employment structures and unemployment? Short-run evidence from global panel data
    DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.11
    Volume: 21 / Issue: 2 / First page: 448 / Year: 2025
    Contributors: Aleksandra Kuzior, Agnieszka Lopatka, Yong Zhou, Judit Oláh
    Journal title: Problems and Perspectives in Management
    Article title: Evidence on the determinants of corporate ownership concentration: Economic development and inequality in OECD countries
    DOI: 10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.09
    Volume: 24 / Issue: 1 / First page: 113 / Year: 2026
    Contributors: Mehriban Aliyeva, Leyla Huseynova
    Journal title: Banks and Bank Systems
    Article title: Do the Sustainable Development Goals enhance bank profitability? Global panel evidence
    DOI: 10.21511/bbs.20(3).2025.13
    Volume: 20 / Issue: 3 / First page: 173 / Year: 2025
    Contributors: Shadiyya Amanova, Bulqeyis Novruzova, Zahid Ganbarov, Sakina Hajiyeva, Javid Huseynli, Ali Hanifayev
    Journal title: Investment Management and Financial Innovations
    Article title: ESG performance and corporate adaptability: Evidence from listed companies in China
    DOI: 10.21511/imfi.23(1).2026.21
    Volume: 23 / Issue: 1 / First page: 277 / Year: 2026
    Contributors: Haixia Ren, Dana Kangalakova, Yanliang Chen, Hao Xu
    Journal title: Investment Management and Financial Innovations
    Article title: Board directors’ educational backgrounds and corporate default risk: Evidence from China
    DOI: 10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.24
    Volume: 22 / Issue: 3 / First page: 318 / Year: 2025
    Contributors: Keyi Wei, Haozhe Qi, Cagri Berk Onuk, Jianing Zhang
  • 1689 Views
  • 480 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The challenges of global warming, resource depletion, and environmental protection require immediate action from corporations, governments, and communities globally. Implementing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) measures represents a key strategy for corporations in addressing sustainability concerns. This study investigates how the ESG performance of publicly listed companies in China is influenced by employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs). Utilizing a dataset covering 4,464 publicly listed Chinese corporations from 2009 to 2022, this analysis employs fixed-effects regressions to reveal the beneficial impact of ESOPs on corporate ESG ratings. A firm’s transition from non-ESOP to ESOP status raises ESG ratings by 1.213, representing 22% of the ESG score’s standard deviation. The findings indicate that greater involvement of the top management team in an ESOP weakens the positive impact of the ESOP on corporate ESG performance. The positive impact of ESOPs on ESG performance is insignificant in the agriculture sector but more pronounced in the manufacturing and service sectors, where the transition to ESOP status results in ESG score increases of 1.122 and 1.500, respectively. The issue of endogeneity is addressed by utilizing a lagged ESOP independent variable and applying two-stage least squares regression with the average ESOP serving as the instrumental variable. The findings confirm that causality runs from ESOP to ESG rather than ESG influencing ESOP.

Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province – General Program (Y202249981, Y202353438), the Wenzhou Association for Science and Technology – Service and Technology Innovation Program (jczc0254), the Wenzhou-Kean University Student Partnering with Faculty Research Program (WKUSPF202404, WKUSPF202411), the Wenzhou-Kean University International Collaborative Research Program (ICRP2023002, ICRP2023004), and the Wenzhou-Kean University Internal Research Support Program (IRSPG202205, IRSPG202206).

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • PAPER PROFILE
  • AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
  • FIGURES
  • TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • Keywords
    China, employee stock ownership plan, environmental sustainability, ESG, top management team, two-stage least squares
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    Q56, Q51, Q58, M14
  • References
    43
  • Tables
    7
  • Figures
    0
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 2. Pairwise correlations
    • Table 3. Baseline regressions
    • Table 4. Moderating effect of TMT subscription ratio
    • Table 5. Different industries
    • Table 6. Lagged independent variable
    • Table 7. Two-stage least squares regressions
    • Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343-1364.
    • Al-Hiyari, A. (2024). Does top executive gender diversity matter for the value relevance of ESG controversies? Empirical evidence from European tech firms. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.
    • Barrick, M. R., Thurgood, G. R., Smith, T. A., & Courtright, S. H. (2015). Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111-135.
    • Blair, M. M., Kruse, D. L., & Blasi, J. (2000). Employee ownership: An unstable form or a stabilizing force? (Working Paper No. 142146). Georgetown University Law Center.
    • Bova, F., Kolev, K., Thomas, J. K., & Zhang, X. F. (2015). Non-executive employee ownership and corporate risk. Accounting Review, 90(1), 115-145.
    • Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479-491.
    • Chen, T., Dong, H., & Lin, C. (2020). Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 483-504.
    • Cogin, J. A., Sanders, K., & Williamson, I. O. (2018). Work-life support practices and customer satisfaction: The role of TMT composition and country culture. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 279-291.
    • Cramton, P., Mehran, H., & Tracy, J. S. (2008). ESOP fables: The impact of employee stock ownership plans on labor disputes (FRB of New York Staff Report No. 347).
    • Ermakova, A., Finogenova, Y., & Subbota, K. (2023). Assessment of industry specifics impact on the ESG rating among Russian companies. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 23, 53-71.
    • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
    • Fatihat, G. G. (2021). The effect of the employee stock ownership program and growth on return on equity (Case studies in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015–2019). Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 1267-1275.
    • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
    • Hasmath, R. (2020). New ESG practices in China and its implications for foreign actors. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs.
    • Hu, J., Li, K., Xia, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). Gender diversity and financial flexibility: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, Article 102934.
    • Jung, H., & Choi, S. (2021). The effects of employee stock ownership on stock liquidity: Evidence from the Korean market. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, Article 101468.
    • Kim, E. H., & Ouimet, P. (2014). Broad-based employee stock ownership: Motives and outcomes. Journal of Finance, 69(3), 1273-1319.
    • Klein, K. J. (1987). Employee stock ownership and employee attitudes: A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 319-332.
    • Kramer, B. (2010). Employee ownership and participation effects on outcomes in firms majority employee-owned through employee stock ownership plans in the US1. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(4), 449-476.
    • Kurland, N. (2018). ESOP plus benefit corporation: Ownership culture with benefit accountability. California Management Review, 60(4), 51-73.
    • Kurnia, T., & Tandiontong, M. (2015). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial ratio to corporate values. Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 227-252.
    • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
    • Lai, S., Liang, H., Liu, Z., Pu, X., & Zhang, J. (2022). Ownership concentration among entrepreneurial firms: The growth-control trade-off. International Review of Economics & Finance, 78, 122-140.
    • Lee, S. P., & Chuang, T. H. (2009). The determinants of corporate performance: A viewpoint from insider ownership and institutional ownership. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(3), 233-247.
    • Liang, Y., Xue, C., & Zhang, J. (2023). The impact of ESG ratings on stock liquidity risk: Evidence from the Chinese market. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 12(4), 1-16.
    • Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J. A., & Pudschedl, P. C. (2024). Institutional investors and ESG preferences. Corporate Governance: An International Review.
    • Lu, S., & Cheng, B. (2023). Does environmental regulation affect firms’ ESG performance? Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(4), 2004-2009.
    • Madison, N., & Schiehll, E. (2021). The effect of financial materiality on ESG performance assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 3652.
    • Mazibuko, N. E., & Boshoff, C. (2003). Employee perceptions of share ownership schemes: An empirical study. South African Journal of Business Management, 34(2), 31-44.
    • Park, S. R., & Jang, J. Y. (2021). The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), Article 48.
    • Rajesh, R., & Rajendran, C. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247-1267.
    • Sang, Y., Loganathan, K., & Lin, L. (2024). Digital transformation and firm ESG performance: The mediating role of corporate risk-taking and the moderating role of top management team. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 5907.
    • Schneider, N. (2020). Broad-based stakeholder ownership in journalism: Co-ops, ESOPs, blockchains. Media Industries Journal, 7(2), 45-67.
    • Schwenk, C. (1993). Management tenure and explanations for success and failure. Omega, 21(4), 449-456.
    • Sheikh, S. (2019). An examination of the dimensions of CEO power and corporate social responsibility. Review of Accounting and Finance, 18(2), 221-244.
    • Velte, P. (2020). Institutional ownership, environmental, social, and governance performance and disclosure – A review on empirical quantitative research. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    • Weissbourd, J., Conway, M., Klein, J., Chang, Y., Kruse, D., Hoover, M., Leverette, T., McKinley, J., & Trenholm, Z. (2021). Race and gender wealth equity and the role of employee share ownership. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 4(2), 116-135.
    • Xiao, H., Shi, Y., & Varma, A. (2019). The effects of employee stock ownership plans on career development in a new era: Evidence from China’s manufacturing transformation. Career Development International, 24(5), 453-474.
    • Xu, X., & Duan, L. (2023). Confucianism and employee stock ownership plans: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 859-872.
    • Zhang, Y. (2023). Employee stock ownership plans and corporate innovation. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 54-59.
    • Zheng, S., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2023). Can customer concentration affect corporate ESG performance? Finance Research Letters, 58, Article 104432.
    • Zhou, L., Wei, F., & Kong, Y. (2022). Do employee stock ownership plans affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1055.
    • Zito, M. J. (2014, June 30). CSRC announces employee stock ownership plan. China Briefing.
    • Conceptualization
      Yasi Liu, Jianing Zhang
    • Data curation
      Yasi Liu
    • Formal Analysis
      Yasi Liu, Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Investigation
      Yasi Liu, Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Methodology
      Yasi Liu, Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Resources
      Yasi Liu
    • Software
      Yasi Liu
    • Visualization
      Yasi Liu
    • Writing – original draft
      Yasi Liu
    • Supervision
      Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Validation
      Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Writing – review & editing
      Shaun McDowell, Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Funding acquisition
      Chunxiao Xue, Jianing Zhang
    • Project administration
      Jianing Zhang
Related Articles
  • ESG or financial metrics? What retail investors really look for in decision-making

    Suresh GopalORCID Researcher ID, Saravanakrishnan V.ORCID , Elangovan N.ORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(1).2025.27
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 22, 2025         Issue #1         pp. 351-368 Views: 3838 Downloads: 760 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    With the increasing global emphasis on responsible investing, this study explores the tradeoff between ESG and traditional financial metrics in shaping the investment decisions of retail investors in India. A within-subject experimental design was employed at Christ University, India, involving an initial sample of 75 participants, with 55 completing all three experiment rounds. The sample respondents evaluated masked stock profiles across three rounds, where updated financial and ESG information on masked stock was provided at each round. The results indicate that though ESG metrics are getting attention among retail investors, financial metrics are still the main determining factor for investment. It was found that ROE (52 responses), 3-year CAGR Net Profit (36 responses), and P/E ratios (48 responses) are the most influencing factors to make investment decisions. Similarly, ESG factors (Governance, Environmental, and Sustainability scores) are also frequently mentioned, with 74 citations. Retail investors mainly consider profitability and view ESG as risk-mitigating or neutralizing factors. While evaluating the ESG factors, retailers mainly look at the firm’s environmental concerns, followed by governance and social factors. This result contrasts with the previous studies in this domain, where the literature emphasized governance factors more than environmental factors. These results highlight the integration of ESG elements, as retail investors remain with favorable returns and sacrifice sustainability. Further, this study spots the need for better and quantifiable ESG performance reports to consider alternative data comparable to financial data for better investment decisions.

  • Demystifying the relationship between ESG and SDG performance: Study of emerging economies

    Tarun Kumar SoniORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.01
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 20, 2023         Issue #3         pp. 1-12 Views: 3773 Downloads: 876 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Companies and investors in emerging markets have started paying attention to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) issues. There has been a growing demand for aligning ESG disclosure of companies to UN SDGs (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals), so understanding how the firm-level ESG affects the country-level SDG is very important for evaluating the advances in ESG and SDG implementation in emerging markets. This study examines the linkage between firm-level ESG disclosures and their relationship with country-level SDG scores over ten years for three emerging countries: India, China, and Brazil. The analysis of 1,500 top-listed firms in these countries reveals an increasing trend of firms going for ESG disclosures and increased ESG scores over the years in the three markets. Out of the total sample, almost 75% of firms make ESG disclosures in Brazil, followed by 54% in India and 32% in China. Additionally, companies in all these countries tend to emphasize governance-related disclosures more, with Brazil having higher ESG disclosures than India and China. The correlation and causality tests indicate a significant positive correlation between mean ESG scores and country-specific SDG scores. The Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests provide stronger linkages between firm-specific Environment scores and SDG scores, indicating that a firm’s environment disclosures translate into higher SDG scores. However, the same is not valid for Social and Governance factors. These findings have important implications given the global attention on the linkages between ESG disclosure and SDG score.

    Acknowledgments
    The financial and infrastructure support provided by FORE School of Management, New Delhi in completing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.

  • The influence of perceived ESG and policy incentives on consumers’ intention to purchase new energy vehicles: Empirical evidence from China

    Xiangyu BianORCID , Aweewan PanyagomethORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(4).2023.15
    Innovative Marketing Volume 19, 2023         Issue #4         pp. 187-198 Views: 3343 Downloads: 1005 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The new energy vehicle industry has proliferated in the face of global climate change and challenges to sustainable development. Understanding the factors that encourage consumers to purchase new energy vehicles is essential to driving the new energy vehicle industry’s future development. Based on signaling theory, this study aims to investigate the significant influence of various factors, such as perceived ESG and policy incentives, on Chinese consumers’ intention to purchase new energy vehicles and explore the mediating effect of brand image and perceived value. This study adopts a quantitative research methodology by collecting data from 860 potential new energy vehicle consumers in China through a questionnaire survey and analyzing the data using structural equation modeling in AMOS 24.0. The results of the study show that consumers’ perceived ESG significantly affects their intention to purchase new energy vehicles. Brand image and perceived value mediate consumers’ perceived ESG factors and their purchase intention of new energy vehicles. Consumers’ positive attitudes will increase the purchase intention of new energy vehicles. In addition, government incentives also have a positive and significant effect on the intention to purchase new energy vehicles. These results provide sustainable marketing guidance for NEV companies, confirming the importance of good environmental, social, and governance performance, good brand image, and perceived benefits in driving purchases. In addition, this study provides empirical evidence of policy support for the NEV industry, thus reinforcing its importance for policymakers.

< Prev Next >
Download Preview
Close
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics
  • Issue #2
  • Journal Homepage
  • Indexed/Abstracted
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies and Publication Ethics
  • Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Acceptance rate
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Article processing charge
 

COOKIES
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the best experience.

If you continue without changing these settings, you consent to this Read more

Accept
newsletter
We accept payment with:
  • visa
  • mastercard
  • ISNI: 0000 0004 6439 8257
  • Copyright © 2026 LLC “CPC “Business Perspectives”,
    except Open Access articles

Developed by MindK. Designed by Crisp.

  • About Us
    • Company
    • News
    • Cooperation and partners
    • Advertising
    • Manuscript Administration System
  • Users support
    • Your profile
    • External services instructions
    • Site navigation
Contact us
  • Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10 Sumy, 40022 , Ukraine
  • +380-542-221707
  • +38-063-2891070
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Tweets by LLC “Business Perspectives”