The role of corporate environmental ethics in shaping environmental management accounting adoption under the institutional theory
-
Author(s)Chetanraj D. B.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3504-4009
,
Senthil Kumar J. P.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-1185
,
Velaga Sri SaiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-6236
,
Ramegowda K. V.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9422-4003
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.03
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2024, Issue #1, pp. 32-45
- 218 Views
-
64 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to investigate the complex association between institutional pressure, adoption of environmental management accounting (EMA), and financial performance, with corporate environmental ethics as a moderating component. It explains why and how firms adopt EMA in response to institutional demand to factor environmental factors into their strategic decision-making processes. Quantitative information is gathered using a structured questionnaire from 256 manufacturing companies’ environmental managers and executives who monitor environmental practices and policies and decision-makers who shape business environmental ethics and strategy in the Indian state of Karnataka. Data are analyzed using SmartPLS 4, and PLS-SEM tests the hypotheses. The results show that coercive pressure (β = 0.244, p = 0.000), mimetic pressure (β = 0.221, p = 0.000), and normative pressure (β = 0.209, p = 0.000) have a major role in determining the rate of EMA adoption. It is further identified that EMA adoption (β = 0.217, p = 0.000) positively influences the organization's financial performance. Furthermore, EMA adoption mediates the relationship between coercive pressure (β = 0.053, p = 0.000), normative pressure (β = 0.045, p = 0.000), mimetic pressure (β = 0.048, p = 0.000), and firm’s financial performance. Coercive pressure is associated with higher EMA adoption, although the impact of this link is moderated by corporate environmental ethics (β = 0.069, p = 0.000).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L51, M41, M14, L00
-
References45
-
Tables9
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
- Figure 2. Structural model of PLS-SEM
-
- Table 1. Demographics of respondents
- Table 2. Reliability and validity
- Table 3. Discriminant validity
- Table 4. R-Square results
- Table 5. f-square statistics
- Table 6. Direct effects
- Table 7. Indirect effects
- Table 8. Moderating effects
- Table A1. Questionnaire: Items for survey scale
-
- Abdelhalim, A. M., Ibrahim, N., & Alomair, M. (2023). The moderating role of digital environmental management accounting in the relationship between eco-efficiency and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 15(9), 7052.
- Abu Afifa, M. M., & Saleh, I. (2022). Management accounting systems effectiveness, perceived environmental uncertainty and companies’ performance: The case of Jordanian companies. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 259-288.
- Andersson, L., Shivarajan, S., & Blau, G. (2005). Enacting ecological sustainability in the MNC: A test of an adapted value-belief-norm framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), 295-305.
- Appannan, J. S., Mohd Said, R., Ong, T. S., & Senik, R. (2023). Promoting sustainable development through strategies, environmental management accounting and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1914-1930.
- Appiah, B. K., Donghui, Z., Majumder, S. C., & Monaheng, M. P. (2019). Effects of environmental strategy, uncertainty and top management commitment on the environmental performance: Role of environmental management accounting and environmental management control system. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 360-370.
- Aragon-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A. A., Rivera, J. E., & Kenworthy, A. L. (2017). Sustainability management teaching resources and the challenge of balancing planet, people, and profits. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(3), 469-483.
- Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76-93.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
- Boukr, A. M. (2016). A study of the f actors influencing the adoption of Management Accounting Innovations in less developed countries: The case of Libya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(August), 128.
- Chaudhry, N. I., & Amir, M. (2020). From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3542-3554.
- Chaudhry, N. I., Asad, H., Ch, M. A., & Hussian, R. I. (2020). Environmental innovation and financial performance: Mediating role of environmental management accounting and firm’s environmental strategy. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 14(3), 715-737.
- Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental management accounting: The significance of contingent variables for adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 163-173.
- Christine, D., Yadiati, W., Afiah, N. N., & Fitrijanti, T. (2019). The relationship of environmental management accounting, environmental strategy and managerial commitment with environmental performance and economic performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 458-464.
- Deb, B. C., Rahman, M. M., & Rahman, M. S. (2023). The impact of environmental management accounting on environmental and financial performance: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(3), 420-446.
- El Maniani, M., Rechchach, M., El Mahfoudi, A., El Moudane, M., & Sabbar, A. (2016). A Calorimetric investigation of the liquid Bi-Ni alloys. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 7(10), 3759-3766.
- Elhossade, S. S., Abdo, H., & Mas’ud, A. (2020). Impact of institutional and contingent factors on adopting environmental management accounting systems: The case of manufacturing companies in Libya. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), 497-539.
- El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483-498.
- Fam, K. S., Ting, H., Tan, K. L., Hussain, K., & Cheah, J. H. (2020). Does it matter where to run? Intention to participate in destination marathon. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(7), 1475-1494.
- Ferreira, A., Moulang, C., & Hendro, B. (2010). Environmental management accounting and innovation: An exploratory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 920-948.
- Gale, R. (2006). Environmental costs at a Canadian paper mill: A case study of environmental management accounting (EMA). Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(14), 1237-1251.
- Guenther, E., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). Environmental management control systems: A conceptualization and a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 147-171.
- Gunarathne, A. D. N., Lee, K.-H., & Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, P. K. (2021). Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 825-839.
- Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307-341.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
- Kalifa, A. M., Triyuwono, I., Irianto, G., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2020). The use and benefit of management accounting practices in Libyan oil companies. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 91-102.
- Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358.
- Kong, Y., Javed, F., Sultan, J., Hanif, M. S., & Khan, N. (2022). EMA implementation and corporate environmental firm performance: A comparison of institutional pressures and environmental uncertainty. Sustainability, 14(9), 5662.
- Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation? – A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 269-292.
- Le, T. T., Nguyen, T. M. A., & Phan, T. T. H. (2019). Environmental management accounting and performance efficiency in the Vietnamese construction material industry – A managerial implication for sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(19), 5152.
- Marcus Alfred, A., & Fremeth Adam, R. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26.
- Mohd Fuzi, N., Habidin, N. F., Adam, S., & Ong, S. Y. Y. (2022). The relationship between environmental cost on organisational performance and environmental management system: A structural equation modelling approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(4), 496-507.
- Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Muramuzi, B., & Alinda, K. (2021). Environmental management accounting, board role performance, company characteristics and environmental performance disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(5), 633-659.
- Pondeville, S., Swaen, V., & De Rongé, Y. (2013). Environmental management control systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 317-332.
- Qian, W., Burritt, R., & Chen, J. (2015). The potential for environmental management accounting development in China. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(3), 406-428.
- Qian, W., Burritt, R., & Monroe, G. (2011). Environmental management accounting in local government: A case of waste management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 93-128.
- Saeidi, S. P., & Othman, M. S. H. (2017). The mediating role of process and product innovation in the relationship between environmental management accounting and firm’s financial performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research (IJBIR), 14(4), 421-438.
- Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1129-1158.
- Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595-619.
- Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2021). Achieving triple bottom line performance: Highlighting the role of social capabilities and environmental management accounting. Management of Environmental Quality, 32(3), 596-611.
- Toms, J. S. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. The British Accounting Review, 34(3), 257-282.
- Wachira, M. M., & Wang’ombe, D. (2019). The application of environmental management accounting techniques by manufacturing firms in Kenya. In Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management (pp. 69-89). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Wang, S., Wang, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 233-243.
- Yusoh, N. N. A. M., & Mat, T. Z. T. (2020). Environmental management accounting adoption barriers among Malaysian hotel companies. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(3), 31-42.
- Zandi, G., & Lee, H. (2019). Factors affecting environmental management accounting and environmental performance: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(6), 342-348.
-
Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development
Anis Ali
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 23-35 Views: 2551 Downloads: 882 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIndustrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.
-
Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?
Sarwar Uddin Ahmed ,
Samiul Parvez Ahmed ,
Ikramul Hasan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 71-80 Views: 2516 Downloads: 988 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhy banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.
-
Integrated reporting and financial performance of South African listed banks
Reon Matemane ,
Rozane Wentzel
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.11
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 128-139 Views: 2471 Downloads: 493 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe recent development of integrated reporting intends to address the limitations associated with corporate reporting practices. This paper aims to examine whether a statistically significant relationship exists between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. Secondary data was used, namely the integrated reports and annual financial statements of South African banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) for 2010–2014. For the period 2005–2009, only the financial statements were used, since integrated reporting was not yet mandatory. The research design was longitudinal and it combined qualitative and quantitative methods. Descriptive statistics and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) were used to explore the relationships between financial performance and integrated reporting quality. The results indicate that there is a positive relationship between integrated reporting quality (IRQ) and earnings per share (EPS). However, there is no significant relationship between IRQ and Tobin’s q (Q-Ratio), IRQ and return on equity (ROE), IRQ and return on assets (ROA) as well as IRQ and economic value added (EVA). Moreover, there are no significant differences on the financial performance of the listed banks before and after the introduction of integrated reporting.
