Ethics, resource rent, environment and petroleum policy: the case of a small open economy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.07
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2021, Issue #1, pp. 76-89
- Cited by
- 1838 Views
-
553 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper contributes to the understanding of how the environment, ethics, values, and historical contingencies shape public policy. It explains the accomplishment of petroleum resource management in the small open economy of Norway. The study is conducted by mapping policy decisions and the arguments behind them regarding environmental and ethical issues. This is done by studying available governmental and parliamentary papers along with statements from politicians and central governmental officials. The paper also seeks to illuminate some of the decisions by quantitative measures.
The paper firstly describes a model of Ricardian resource rent. Secondly, it investigates the set of values that were in place before the petroleum production started in the 1970s, as described in public documents. An important argument was to build a “qualitatively better society” for the benefit of the people. Thirdly, it traces the historical roots of these values by examining historical sources.
The main findings are that success lies in understanding the ethics behind the environmental resource rent harvesting of this non-renewable natural resource. The paper concludes that the focus on the natural environment and resource rent management can be attributed to popular values built on historical traditions. According to them, the state and the trust between the state and its citizens played key roles in shaping the policy. The careful policy can be illustrated by the fact that Norway has managed to build one of the largest sovereign funds in the world worth USD 1,200 billion for use by future generations. Only 3% of its value, significantly less than its historical net profit, should be used annually.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L52, N14, N50, Q32, Q38, Q58
-
References40
-
Tables3
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Taxes from oil and gas extractions in Norway 1971–2021, billion NOK 2021 values
- Figure 2. Ricardian resource rent
- Figure 3. Value of the Norwegian Pension Fund – Global, in USD billion
- Figure 4. Value of the Norwegian Pension Fund – Global, ratio to mainland GDP
-
- Table 1. The ten oil commandments to ensure efficient utilization of resource rent from Norwegian petroleum reserves
- Table 2. Popular confidence in Scandinavia and Europe
- Table 3. Popular trust and confidence in Norway and the USA
-
- Aaheim, A. (1994). Inntekter fra utvinning av norske naturressurser. Noen teoretiske betraktninger (Statistics Norway 94/14).
- Austvik, O. G. (2012). Landlord and Entrepreneur: The Shifting Roles of the State in Norwegian Oil and Gas Policy. Governance, 25(2), 315-334.
- Berend, I. (2013). An Economic History of Nineteenth-Century Europe: Diversity and Industrialization. Cambridge University Press.
- Bjørklund, K. (2008). Caltex-saken og norsk oljepolitikk på Svalbard fra 1960 til 1973. University of Oslo (Master’s Thesis).
- Bjørklund, K. (2009). Norwegian oil policy on Svalbard: The Caltex case 1960–67. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies.
- Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311-327.
- Finansdepartementet. (1974). Petroleumsvirksomhetens plass i det norske samfunn (Meld. St. nr. 25 1973-74).
- Finanskomiteen. (1974). Innstilling fra finanskomitéen om petroleumsvirksomhetens plass i det norske samfunn (St. meld. nr. 25) (Innst. S. nr. 275 1973-74).
- Grytten, O. H. (2020). Two Centuries of Economic Growth: Norwegian GDP 1816–2020 (Discussion Paper No. 10/2020). NHH Dept. of Economics.
- Gulbrandsen, T. (2007). Elite Integration and Institutional Trust in Norway. Comparative Sociology, 6(1-2), 190-214.
- Gulbrandsen, T., & Engelstad, F. (2005). Elite consensus on the Norwegian welfare state model. West European Politics, 28(4), 898-918.
- Gustafsson, H. (2007). Nordens historia: en europeisk region under 1200 år (2nd ed.). Studentlitteratur.
- Hanisch, T. J., & Nerheim, G. (1992). Norsk oljehistorie: Fra vantro til overmot? Oslo: Norsk petroleumsforening.
- Heiret, J. (2012). Three Norwegian Varieties of a Nordic Model - A Historical Perspective on Working Life Relations. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(4), 45-66.
- Holden, S. (2013). Avoiding the resource curse the case Norway. Energy Policy, 63, 870-876.
- Ihlen, Ø., & von Weltzien Hoivik, H. (2015). Ye Olde CSR: The Historic Roots of Corporate Social Responsibility in Norway. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 109-120.
- Industridepartementet. (1970). Undersøkelse etter og utvinning av undersjøiske naturforekomster på den norske kontinentalsokkel m.m (Meld. St. nr. 95 1969–70).
- Industridepartementet. (1971). Undersøkelser etter og utvinning av undersjøiske naturforekomster på den norske kontinentalsokkel m.m (Meld. St. nr. 76 1970–71).
- Industrikomité. (1971). Innstilling fra den forsterkede industrikomité om undersøkelse etter og utvinning av undersjøiske naturforekomster på den norske kontinentalsokkelen m. m (Innst. S. nr. 294 1973–1974).
- Judt, T. (2010). Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. Vintage Books.
- Karl, T. L. (1997). The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. University of California Press.
- Kjeldstadli, K. (2005). Et splittet samfunn 1905–1935 (Bind 10 i Aschehougs Norgeshistorie). Oslo: Aschehoug.
- Lange, E. (1977). The Concession Laws of 1906–09 and Norwegian Industrial Development. Scandinavian Journal of History, 2(4), 311-330.
- Legatum Institute. (2015). The Legatum Prosperity Index.
- Lie, E. (2016). Context and Contingency: Explaining State Ownership in Norway. Enterprise & Society, 17(4), 904-930.
- Lie, E., Myklebust, E., & Norvik, H. (2014). Staten som kapitalist: Rikdom og eierskap for det 21. århundre. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
- Moses, J. W. (2005). Norwegian Catch-Up. Development and Globalization before World War II. Aldershot: Asgate.
- Noreng, Ø. (1984). Olje-Norge. Det bevisstløse eksperiment. Oslo: Aschehoug.
- Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM). (2021). Market value.
- Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. (2010). 10 commanding achievements.
- Norwegian Petroleum. (2021). The petroleum tax system. 2021: Preliminary estimations.
- Østerud, Ø. (2005). Introduction: The peculiarities of Norway. West European Politics, 28(4), 705-720.
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth (NBER Working Paper No. W5398). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Sejersted, F. (1993). Demokratisk kapitalisme. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
- Sejersted, F. (2011). The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Princeton University Press.
- Skirbekk, G. (2010). Norsk og moderne. Oslo: Res Publica.
- Skredderberget, A. (2015). Usannsynlig rik: historien om Norge og oljefondet. Oslo: Kagge Forlag.
- Slagstad, R. (2001). De nasjonale strateger. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
- Thue, L. (2008). Norway: a resource-based and democratic capitalism. In S. Fellman, M. J. Iversen, H. Sjögren, & L. Thue (Eds.), Creating Nordic Capitalism. The Business History of a Competitive Periphery. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- World Value Survey. (2014). World Value Survey (wave 5, 2005–2009).