Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource

  • Received July 15, 2017;
    Accepted August 22, 2017;
    Published October 11, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Urs Steiner Brandt
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(3-1).2017.01
  • Article Info
    Volume 8 2017, Issue #3, pp. 92-101
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • 628 Views
  • 128 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

How do the levels of extreme positions of various interest groups influence the conservation policies in the context of a renewable resource conservation contest? To answer this question, a model is provided where conservation policy is determined as a contest between two opposing interest groups: one in favor of conservation and another in favor of non-conservation. The levels of extreme positions for the conservationalists are determined by their demands about the severity of the conservation strategy that needs to be implemented. For the non-conservation group, the level of extreme position is determined by how large the current harvest of the resource should be.
The main driver of the model is that resource conservation is realized only if the conservation group wins the contest, which again depends on the relative gain the two contenders receive when winning the contest. The paper derives conditions where the more extreme positioned groups will have less likelihood of succeeding, e.g., a conservation group demanding larger conservation efforts will face a reduced probability that actual conservation policies will be implemented.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. The possible positions of the two competing groups
    • Fig. 2. Situation where β=1
    • Fig. 3. Situation where β=0
    • Fig. 4. Situation where α=1
    • Fig. 5. Situation where α=0
    • Brandt, U. S., & Svendsen, G. T. (2016). The Politics of Persuasion: Should Lobbying be Regulated in the EU? Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Brandt, U. S., & Svendsen, G. T. (2009). Trawling for subsidies: the alignment of incentives between fishermen and marine biologists. Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 1012-1029.
    • Dijkstra, B. R. (1998). Cooperation by way of support in a Rent Seeking Contest for a Public Good. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 703-725.
    • Eerola, E. (2004). Forest conservation – too much or too little? A political economy model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 27, 391-407.
    • Epstein, G. S., & Nitzan, S. (2002). Stakes and Welfare in Rent-Seeking Contests. Public Choice, 112, 137-142.
    • Epstein, G. S., & Nitzan, S. (2007). Endogenous policy and contests. Berlin: Springer.
    • Epstein, G. S., Nitzan, S., & Schwarz, M. E. (2008). Efforts in two-sided contests. Public Choice, 136, 283-291.
    • EU (2005). European Commision: Thematic Strategy on the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
    • EU (2008). The Marine Strategy Framework Directive. (MSFD 2008/56/EC, EC 2008).
    • Graichen, P. R., Requate, T., & Dijkstra, B. R. (2001). How to Win the Political Contest: A Monopolist vs. Environmentalists. Public Choice, 108, 273-293.
    • Hovi, J., Underdahl, A., & Ward, H. (2011). Potential contribution s of political science to environmental economics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 391-411.
    • ICES (2005). ICES.
    • IPCC (2014). Fifth Assessment Report, synthesis report.
    • Juda, L. (2010). The European Union and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Continuing the Development of European Ocean Use Management. Ocean Development & International Law, 41, 34-54.
    • Liston-Heyes, C. (2001). Setting the Stakes in Environmental Contests. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 1-12.
    • Long, R. (2011). The Marine Strategy Framework Directive: A New European Approach to the Regulation of the Marine Environment, Marine Natural Resources and Marine Ecological Services. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 29, 1-44.
    • Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. (1993). Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: Lessons from history. Science, 260, 36-37.
    • Nitzan, S. (1994). Modeling Rent Seeking Contests. European Journal of Political Economy, 10, 41-60.
    • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Pauly, D. (1995). Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 430.
    • Richards, J. P., & Heard, J. (2005). European environmental NGOs: Issues, Resources and Strategies in the Marine Campaigns. Environmental Politics, 14, 23-41.
    • Varjopuro, R., Andrulewicz, E., Blenckner, T., Dolch, T., Heiskanen, A.-S., Pihlajamäki, M., Brandt, U. S., Valman, M. , Gee, K., Potts, T., & Psuty, I. (2014). Coping with persistent environmental problems – Systemic delays in reducing eutrophication of the Baltic Sea. Ecology and Society, 19, 48.
    • Wilen, J. E. (2000). Renewable Resource Economists and Policy: What Differences Have We Made? Journal of Environmental and Economics and Management, 39, 306-327.
    • WWF (2006). A Sustainable Future for Baltic Sea Cod and Cod Fisheries. WWF Baltic Ecoregion programme, WWF, Denmark.
Related Articles

  • Harmful mining activities, environmental impacts and effects in the mining communities in South Africa: a critical perspective

    Makua M. Pretty , Kola O. Odeku doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(4).2017.02
    Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017         Issue #4         pp. 14-24 Views: 1423 Downloads: 2345 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In South Africa, the right to a clean environment is constitutionally guaranteed. However, this right is being violated on a daily basis by the mining companies who degrade and harm the environment in the communities they operate. Even though laws have been put in place to regulate, protect and deter degradation, the reality is that the mining companies have been found wanting several times in discharging their constitutional obligations not to degrade and harm the environment. This paper examines impacts and effects of the mining activities. It also looks at the legislative interventions that have been put in place to serve as checks against the mining companies and provides insights on how they are being used to regulate harmful mining practices.

  • Dynamic links between ICT, transport energy, environmental degradation and growth: empirical evidence from Tunisia

    Mounir Ben Mbarek , Nahed Zghidi doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(3).2017.08
    Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017         Issue #3         pp. 76-83 Views: 1236 Downloads: 260 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The transport sector, particularly road transport, is a major factor in the overall emissions balance of the substances involved in air pollution for the majority of developing countries. This paper investigates the dynamic links between information and communication technology (ICT), transport energy, environmental degradation and growth for Tunisia. The authors used a Johansen co-integration analysis to determine this econometric relationship using data during 1990–2015. In order to test the Granger causality links in the short and long run, a panel Vector Error Correction Model is used. The variance decomposition is used to confirm the existing links between the different variables. Different results are found. These findings show the existence of bidirectional in short- and long-run causality between transport energy and CO2 emissions. By cons, ICT does not minimize significantly pollution in Tunisia. These findings are very important for the transport sector and in terms of the choice of government policy decisions in order to minimize the pollution.

  • Corporate governance and resource management in Nigeria: a paradigm shift

    Olabode A. OyewunmiORCID , Adebukola E. Oyewunmi doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.25
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #1         pp. 259-266 Views: 1149 Downloads: 161 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The underlying significance of instituting measures for effective corporate governance and rewarding resource management outcomes cannot be relegated. The countries and organizations that deemphasize this practice have mortgaged their potential for long-term growth and corporate sustainability. This paper adopts a critical narrative method to deconstruct the essence of corporate governance and economic resource management ideals. The paper furthers the ongoing conversations on two interrelated business concepts, and provides an apt perspective towards unlocking the essence of corporate governance relative to the Nigeria’s corporate environment. It depicts a corporate paradigm shift that accommodates the dynamics of global best practices taking into account some peculiarities of Nigeria’s corporate climate. The paper also captures relevant theoretical dimensions and pragmatic policy propositions, especially for underperforming socio-economic contexts. In the light of the central theme, specific issues are discussed under the sub-headings of conceptual and theoretical clarifications, corporate governance and resource management in Nigeria, shifting the paradigms, conclusion and recommendations.

Download Preview
Close
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics