The impact of real exchange rates on price competitiveness in Eastern European countries
-
Author(s)Nadiia ProskurninaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-0467
,
Jürgen Kähler
,
Rosario Cervantes-MartinezLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-0379
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ed.19(1).2020.05
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2020, Issue #1, pp. 45-55
- 649 Views
-
266 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The subject of this paper is empirical research on studies of exchange rates in Eastern European countries, such as Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belarus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, (North) Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia, in order verify the validity of theories that explain these changes. This research aims to explain the mixed evidence of the Balassa-Samuelson effect in Ukraine, taking into account the intentions of Ukraine to become a member of the European Union. Unlike previous works, the attention is shifted to a review of empirical evidence and the identification of main factors that limit the ability to verify the theory. The main conclusion is that all the currencies studied underwent substantial real appreciations during the study period. Thus, it can be concluded that an adequate monetary policy in countries under study is very important, given that local exchange markets are not sustainable enough and the volatility of exchange operations is higher than in countries with developed economies. However, the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis (BSH) can explain the impact of the real exchange rate due to changes in productivity in countries in transition.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)B27, C33, C58, E5, F36, F4
-
References36
-
Tables3
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. REERtCR for countries that introduced the euro
- Figure 2. REERtCR for EU countries with non-euro currencies
- Figure 3. REERtCR for non-EU countries
- Figure 4. QtPL for countries that introduced the euro
- Figure 5. QtPL for EU countries with non-euro currencies
- Figure 6. QtPL for non-EU countries
-
- Table 1. Review of Egert’s studies on the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in selected European countries
- Table 2. Review of studies on the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in Romania
- Table 3. Testing for the Balassa-Samuelson Effect
-
- Arratibel, O., Rodriguez-Palenzuela, R., & Thimann, C. (2002). Inflation Dynamics and Dual Inflation in Accession Countries: A “New Keynesian Perspective” (Working Paper No. 132).
- Asea, P., & Corden, W. (1994). The Balassa-Samuelson Model: An Overview. Review of International Economics, 2(3), 191-200.
- Asea, P., & Mendoza, E. (1994). The Balassa-Samuelson Model: A General-Equilibrium Appraisal. Review of International Economics, 2, 244-267.
- Balassa, B. (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal. Journal of Political Economy, 72(6), 584-596.
- Blaszkiewicz, M., Kowalski, P., Rawdanowicz, L., & Wozniak, P. (2004). Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CASE Reports No. 57) (96 p.).
- Candelon, B., Kool, C., Raabe, K., & Veen, T. (2007). Long-Run Real Exchange Rate Determinants: Evidence from Eight New EU Member States, 1993-2003. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 87-107.
- Cassel, G. (1918). Abnormal Deviations in International Exchanges. The Economic Journal, 28(112), 413-415.
- CEPII. Research and expertise on the world economy (n.d.). Official web-site.
- Chinn, M. (2006). A Primer on Real Effective Exchange Rates: Determinants, Overvaluation, Trade Flows and Competitive Devaluation. Open Economy Review, 17(1), 115-143.
- Clarida, R., & Gali, J. (1994). Sources of Real Exchange-Rate Fluctuations: How Important Are Nominal Shocks? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41, 1-56.
- De Gregorio, J., Giovannini, A., & Wolf, H. (1994). International Evidence on Tradables and Nontradables Inflation. European Economic Review, 38(6), 1225-1224.
- Dedu, V., & Dumitrescu, B. (2010). The Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 10(4), 44-53.
- Dornbusch, R. (1987). Purchasing Power Parity (NBER Working Papers No. 1591).
- Dumitru, I. (2008). Efectul Balassa-Samuelson in Romania. Romania in Uniunea Europeana, 36, 11-46.
- Dumitru, I., & Ionela, J. (2009). The Balassa-Samuelson effect in Romania - The role of Regulated Prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 873-887.
- Egert, B. (2002a). Investigating the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in the Transition: Do We Understand What We See? A panel study. Economics of Transition becomes Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 10(2), 273-309.
- Egert, B. (2002b). Estimating the Impact of the Balassa-Samuelson Effect on Inflation and the Real Exchnage Rate during the Transition. Economic Systems 26(1), 1-16.
- Egert, B. (2004). Equilibrium exchange rates in South Eastern Europe, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey: Healthy or (Dutch) diseased? Economic Systems, 29(2), 205-241.
- Egert, B. (2005). Balassa-Samuelson Meets South Eastern Europe, the CIS and Turkey: A Close Encounter of the Third Kind? The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2(2), 221-243.
- Egert, B. et al. (2003). The Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Central and Eastern Europe: Myth or Reality? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 552-572.
- Feenstra, R., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. (2015). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182.
- Flood, R., & Taylor, P. (1996). Exchange Rate Economics: What’s Wrong with the Conventional Macro Approach? In The Microstructure of Foreign Exchange Markets (pp. 261-302). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Froot, K., & Rogoff, K. (1994). Perspectives on PPP and Long-Run Real Exchange Rates. In G. Grossman, K. Rogoff (Ed.), Handbook of international Economics, 3 (pp. 1647-1688).
- Giovannini, A. (1998). Exchange rates and Traded Goods Prices. Journal of International Economics, 24(1/2), 45-68.
- Halpern, L., & Wyplosz, C. (2001). Economic Transformation and Real Exchange Rates in the 2000s: The Balassa-Samuelson Connection. Economic Survey of Europe, 1(1), 227-239.
- Hsieh, D. (1982). The Determination of the Real Exchange Rate. The Productivity Approach. Journal of International Economics, 12(3-4), 355-362.
- Isard, P. (1977). How Far Can We Push the “Law of One Price”? The American Economic Association, 67(5), 942-948.
- Marston, R. (1987). Real Exchange Rates and Productivity growth in the United States and Japan. In S. Arndtand, J. Richardson (Ed.), Journal Real Financial Linkages among Open Economies (pp. 71-96). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Mihaljek, D., & Klau, M. (2004). The Balassa–Samuelson Effect in Central Europe: A Disaggregated Analysis. Comparative Economic Studies, 46(1), 63-94.
- O’Connell, P., & Wie, S. (1997). The Bigger They Are, The Harder They Fall: How Price Differences Across U.S. Cities Are Arbitraged (NBER Working Papers 6089) (33 p.). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Parsley, D., & Wie, S. (1996). Convergence to the Law of One Price Without Trade Barriers or Currency Fluctuations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(4), 1211-1236.
- Rogoff, K. (1996). The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 647-668.
- Samuelson, P. (1964). Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 46(2), 145-154.
- Sarno, L., & Chowdhury, I. (2001). Nonlinear Dynamics in Deviations from the Law of One Price: A Broad-Based Empirical Study. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking.
- Sarno, L., & Taylor, A. (2002). Purchasing Power Parity and the Real Exchange Rate. IMF Staff Papers, 49(1), 65-105.
- Taylor, A. (2002). A Century of Purchasing-Power Parity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1), 139-150.
-
Trade openness and real effective exchange rate volatility: The case of Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Kim Lien ,
Thu-Trang Thi Doan ,
Toan Ngoc Bui
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.13
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 17, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 150-160 Views: 686 Downloads: 589 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ2004–2020. The study was conducted in the context that Vietnam’s trade openness is increasing, causing significant challenges in macro management, including exchange rate management. The authors use vector autoregression model and Granger causality test to test this relationship. The study used a vector autoregression model and Granger causality test to investigate the causal relationship between trade openness and real effective exchange rate volatility in Vietnam over the period 2004–2020. The study was conducted in the context of Vietnam’s trade openness index rising, causing significant challenges in macro management, including exchange rate management. The study takes a new approach (i) using Vietnam’s real effective exchange rate relative to 143 trading partners; and (ii) examining the impact of economic growth on trade openness and exchange rate volatility. The research results indicate that trade openness has a two-way Granger causality with effective real exchange rate volatility in Vietnam at the 1% significance level. Specifically, the effect of trade openness on real exchange rate volatility is positive at a 1-period lag and 4-period lag. Meanwhile, real exchange rate fluctuations have a negative effect on trade openness with a 1-period lag. At the same time, the study also finds that increased economic growth reduces real effective exchange rate volatility and increases Vietnam’s trade openness. On that basis, the study proposes implications for the management of trade openness and exchange rate management in the current Vietnamese context.
