The impact of collaboration capability, ambidextrous leadership and digital capability on bank performance sustainability

  • 86 Views
  • 23 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

To survive the competition in the banking industry after the fintech uprisings, banks implement various collaborations, but they often turn out to be unsuccessful. This study examines the impact of collaboration capability on bank performance sustainability, as well as how ambidextrous leadership and digital capability influence it. The methodological framework includes the development of instruments based on previous literature and quantitative procedures. The data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to 101 private commercial banks in Indonesia. The proposed model is analyzed using structural equation modelling techniques with partial least squares (SEM-PLS), using SmartPLS 4.0. This study’s findings show that collaboration capability has a direct positive effect on bank performance sustainability, digital capability has a direct positive effect on both collaboration capability and bank performance sustainability; while ambidextrous leadership has a direct positive effect on collaboration capability but not on bank performance sustainability. This study contributes to the development and validation of a new model on the influence of collaboration capability on performance sustainability along with the influence of ambidextrous leadership and digital capability in the Indonesian banking sector.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual framework
    • Figure 2. Convergent validity test (1st stage)
    • Figure 3. Convergent validity test (2nd stage)
    • Figure 4. P-values
    • Table 1. Respondents’ demographics
    • Table 2. Convergent validity (1st stage)
    • Table 3. Discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion) (1st stage)
    • Table 4. Reliability test (1st stage)
    • Table 5. Convergent validity result (2nd stage)
    • Table 6. Discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion) (2nd stage)
    • Table 7. Reliability test (2nd stage)
    • Table 8. Hypothesis testing results
    • Table 9. R-square test results
    • Table 10. f-square test results
    • Table 11. Model fit results
    • Conceptualization
      Suhardjo Moeliadi, Mts. Arief, Willy Gunadi, Rano Kartono Rahim
    • Data curation
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Formal Analysis
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Funding acquisition
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Investigation
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Methodology
      Suhardjo Moeliadi, Mts. Arief, Willy Gunadi, Rano Kartono Rahim
    • Project administration
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Resources
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Software
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Validation
      Suhardjo Moeliadi, Mts. Arief, Willy Gunadi, Rano Kartono Rahim
    • Visualization
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Writing – original draft
      Suhardjo Moeliadi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Suhardjo Moeliadi, Mts. Arief, Willy Gunadi, Rano Kartono Rahim
    • Supervision
      Mts. Arief, Willy Gunadi, Rano Kartono Rahim