Competition and efficiency in an oligopolistic audit market: Evidence from the Nigerian banking industry
-
Author(s)Tajudeen John AyoolaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8133-7294
,
Eghosa Godwin InnehLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4636-9869
,
Lawrence Ogechukwu ObokohLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-5431
,
Peace Ebunoluwa KolawoleLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-2594
,
Ebunoluwa Tokunbo Adeoye
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(4).2022.11
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2022, Issue #4, pp. 129-139
- Cited by
- 371 Views
-
103 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Economic theory posits that competition drives efficiency; the extent to which this is true in an oligopolistic audit market poses an empirical challenge. Furthermore, studies have postulated that both traditional and modern industrial organization theories are relevant for analyzing market competition. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of static and dynamic audit market competition on audit efficiency in the Nigerian banking industry. Secondary data were obtained from the audited annual financial statements of 12 banks from 2006 to 2020. The study adopted a 2-stage regression model; in the first stage, the audit efficiency scores were derived from an output-based, variable-return-to-scale version of data envelopment analysis (DEA) comprising audit report lag and audit fees as audit input variables and audit quality as the audit output variable. The efficiency scores were regressed on audit market competition and some control variables in the second stage via the bootstrapped truncated regression technique to analyze the effect of competition on efficiency in the audit market. The results showed a positive association between static competition and audit efficiency (50.57, p = 0.014). Because high concentration implied low competition, this finding implied that efficiency was impaired because of a lack of significant competition. The results also showed a positive and significant association between dynamic competition and efficiency, which implied that dynamic competition enhanced efficiency (0.21, p = 0.000) in the audit market. The study concluded that static competition impairs efficiency, while dynamic competition ensures efficiency in the Nigerian banking industry.
view full abstract
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C24, G14, G21, L13
-
References46
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample selection
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation analysis
- Table 4. Regression results
-
- Aobdia, D., Choudhary, P., & Newberger, N. (2019). Which audit input matters? An analysis of the determinants of audit quality, profitability, and audit fees using PCAOB data. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-58.
- Asien, E. N. (2014). Exploring the state of the audit market in Nigeria. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 3(4), 287-307.
- Asthana, S., Khurana, I., & Raman, K. K. (2019). Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52(2), 403-438.
- Averhals, L., Van Caneghem, T., & Willekens, M. (2020). Mandatory audit fee disclosure and price competition in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 40, 100337.
- Ayoola, T. J. (2022). Audit fees, audit seasonality and audit quality in Nigeria: a mediation analysis. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. Advance online publication.
- Azizkhani, M., Sami, H., Amirkhani, K., & Monroe, G. S. (2022). Competition effects on audit quality and pricing in a non-Big 4 market. International Journal of Accounting, 57(4), 2250015.
- Badunenko, O., & Tauchmann, H. (2019). Simar and Wilson two-stage efficiency analysis for Stata. The Stata Journal, 19(4), 950-988.
- Bain, J. S. (1951). Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324.
- Baldwin, J. R., & Gorecki, P. K. (1989). Measuring the dynamics of market structure: concentration and mobility statistics for the Canadian manufacturing sector. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 15(16), 315-332.
- Broye, G., & Weill, L. (2008). The Effects of Concentration on Competition and Efficiency: Some Evidence from the French Audit Market (Working Paper No. 2008-04).
- Buijink, W. F., Maijoor, S. J., & Meuwissen, R. H. (1998). Competition in auditing: Evidence from entry, exit, and market share mobility in Germany versus the Netherlands. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(3), 385-404.
- Bylykbashi, S., & Roehrich, G., & Assala, K. (2021). How to measure competitive intensity? European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, 5(1), 22-42.
- Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1978). Market Structure, Oligopoly, and Stability of Market Shares. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26(4), 289-313.
- Chang, H., Kao, Y. C., Mashruwala, R., & Sorensen, S. M. (2018). Technical inefficiency, allocative inefficiency, and audit pricing. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(4), 580-600.
- Choi, A., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2020). Dynamic auditor competition and audit quality in the United States. Korean Accounting Review, 45(2), 31-75.
- Chou, T-K., Pittman, J. A., & Zhuang, Z. (2021). The importance of partner narcissism to audit quality. The Accounting Review, 96(6), 103-127.
- Chu, L., Simunic, D. A., Ye, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). Transaction costs and competition among audit firms in local markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 129-147.
- Davies, S. W., & Geroski, P. A. (1997). Changes in concentration, turbulence, and the dynamics of market shares. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(3), 383-391.
- Dedman, E., & Lennox, C. (2009). Perceived competition, profitability and the withholding of information about sales and the cost of sales. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 210-230.
- DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
- Dekeyser, S., Gaeremynck, A., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2016). Competitive rivalry in audit markets.
- Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1-9.
- Eshleman, J. D., & Lawson, B. P. (2017). Audit market structure and audit pricing. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), 57-81.
- Evans, L., & Schwartz, J. (2014). The effect of concentration and regulation on audit fees: An application of panel data techniques. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27, 130-144.
- Gerakos, J., & Syverson, C. (2015). Competition in the audit market: Policy implications. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(4), 725-775.
- Hallman, N., Kartapanis, A., & Schmidt, J. (2018). The existence and effect of competition in the audit market: Evidence from the bidding process (Working Paper). Austin: University of Texas.
- Hollingshead, R. T. (1996). Discussion of: An empirical test of Bentham’s theory of the persuasiveness of evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 33-36.
- Hymer, S., & Pashigian, P. (1962). Firm Size and Rate of Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 70(6), 556-569.
- Kend, M., Houghton, K. A., & Jubb, C. (2014). Competition issues in the market for audit and assurance services: Are the concerns justified? Australian Accounting Review, 24(4), 313-320.
- Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-Provided Non-Audit Services and Audit Effectiveness and Efficiency: Evidence from pre-and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85-114.
- Knechel, W. R., Rouse, P., & Schelleman, C. (2009). A modified audit production framework: Evaluating the relative efficiency of audit engagements. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1607-1638.
- Mali, D., & Lim, H. J. (2021). Can audit effort (hours) reduce a firm’s cost of capital? Evidence from South Korea. Accounting Forum, 45(2), 171-199.
- McDonald, J. (2009). Using least squares and Tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 792-798.
- Mohammad Rezaei, F., & Mohd-Saleh, N. (2018). Audit report lag: the role of auditor type and increased competition in the audit market. Accounting & Finance, 58(3), 885-920.
- Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2012). An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 450-465.
- O’Keefe, T. B., Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1994). The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 241-261.
- Pan, Y., Shroff, N., & Zhang, P. (2022). The Dark Side of Audit Market Competition. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Advance online publication.
- Pearson, T., & Trompeter, G. (1994). Competition in the market for audit services: The effect of supplier concentration on audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 115-135.
- Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31-64.
- StataCorp. (2019). Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
- Tan, Y., & Anchor, J. (2017). The impacts of risk-taking behaviour and competition on technical efficiency: evidence from the Chinese banking industry. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 90-104.
- Van Raak, J., Peek, E., Meuwissen, R., & Schelleman, C. (2020). The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private-client market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(3-4), 456-488.
- Weiss, L. (Ed.). (1989). Concentration and price. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Williams, R. (2010). Fitting heterogeneous choice models with Oglm. The Stata Journal, 10(4), 540-567.
- Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Yuan, C. (2020). How audit effort affects audit quality: An audit process and audit output perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 109-127.
- Zhang, P., Ye, M., Simunic, D., & Chu, L. (2019). Market Power and Competition in Audit Markets. Manoa, Hawaii. In Hawai’i Accounting Research Conference (HARC).
