The drivers of volume volatility: A big data analysis based on economic uncertainty measures for the Greek banking system
-
Author(s)Leonidas TheodorakopoulosLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-6780
,
Hera AntonopoulouLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3936-435X
,
Vicky MamalougouLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-8207
,
Konstantinos C. GiotopoulosLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-6313
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(3).2022.05
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2022, Issue #3, pp. 49-57
- Cited by
- 564 Views
-
161 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In this paper, an investigation is conducted to estimate the effect of economic uncertainty on volume volatility, focusing on four systemic Greek banking institutions, including (i) Alpha Bank, (ii) Eurobank, (iii) National Bank of Greece, and (iv) Piraeus Bank. The purpose of this study is to explain in detail if the EPU is linked with volume volatility in the largest banking institutions in Greece. For the analysis of this paper, data used are monthly data of volume to explain the economic uncertainty on volume volatility. The analysis period covers the period from January 2001 to August 2018, incorporating various market phases, such as the global financial crisis of 2008, the European debt crisis, and capital controls in the Greek economy. The methodology used for the research is the well-known GARCH model. Based on the estimated regressions, the present research findings showed that economic uncertainty has various effects on the volume volatility of the four systemic Greek banking institutions. More specifically, when economic uncertainty receives a high value, then the volatility of the volume in Greek banking institutions increases, receiving a higher value. In conclusion, it is observed that economic uncertainty positively affects the volume volatility of the Greek banking system.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F65, G11, G12, G24
-
References42
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Greek banks’ volume (in y axes) evolution from 2001 to 2018
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Parameter estimates for the marginal distribution of returns
-
- Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2008). Financial Intermediaries, Financial Stability, and Monetary Policy (Staff Report No. 346).
- Amengual, D., & Xiu, D. (2018). Resolution of policy uncertainty and sudden declines in volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 203(2), 297-315.
- Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2013). Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility, and policy uncertainty. Economics Letters, 120(1), 87-92.
- Antonopoulou, H., Mamalougou, V., & Theodorakopoulos, L. (2022). The Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Predicting Stock Return Volatility in the Banking Industry: A Big Data Analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 6(3), 569-577.
- Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
- Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Canes-Wrone, B., Davis, S. J., & Rodden, J. (2014). Why Has US Policy Uncertainty Risen since 1960? American Economic Review, 104(5), 56-60.
- BIS. (2011). 81st Annual Report, 2010/11.
- BIS. (2013). 83rd Annual Report, 2012/13.
- Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
- Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3-18.
- Chen, L., Du, Z., & Hu, Z. (2020). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on exchange rate volatility of China. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101266.
- Cœuré, B. (2013). Outright monetary transactions, one year on (Speech). ECB its OMT Program.
- Colombo, V. (2013). Economic policy uncertainty in the US: Does it matter for the Euro area? Economics Letters, 121(1), 39-42.
- Danchev, S., Gatopoulos, G., & Vettas, N. (2020). Penetration of Digital Payments in Greece after Capital Controls: Determinants and Impact on VAT Revenues. CESifo Economic Studies, 66(3), 198-220.
- Dritsas, E., Livieris, I. E., Giotopoulos, K., & Theodorakopoulos, L. (2018). An apache spark implementation for graph-based hashtag sentiment classification on twitter. Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 255-260). Athens, Greece.
- Dzielinski, M. (2012). Measuring economic uncertainty and its impact on the stock market. Finance Research Letters, 9(3), 167-175.
- ECB. (2010). Annual report.
- ECB. (2011). Annual report.
- Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007.
- Fanta, F., & Sum, V. (2012). Long-Run Relation and Speed of Adjustment of Economic Policy Uncertainty and Excess Return Volatility. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 102, 6-12.
- Flannery, M., & Nikolova, S. (2004). Market discipline of US financial firms: Recent evidence and research issues. In C. Borio, W. Hunter, G. Kaufman, & K. Tsatsaronis (Eds.), Market Discipline across Countries and Industries (pp. 87-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gkillas, K., Konstantatos, C., Tsagkanos, A., & Longin, F. (2019). Extreme Dependencies in the European Banking Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Hilbert, M., & Lopez, P. (2011). The World’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332, 60-65.
- Johnson, T. C., & Lee, J. (2014). On the systematic volatility of unpriced earnings. Journal of Financial Economics, 114(1), 84-104.
- Kanavos, A., Theodorakopoulos, L., & Vonitsanos, G. (2019). A NoSQL Approach for Recommendation of Highly Rated Products. 7th International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues (ICCMI).
- Kang, W., & Ratti, R. (2013). Oil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market return Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 26, 305-318.
- Karnizova, L., & Li, J. (C.) (2014). Economic policy uncertainty, financial markets and probability of US recessions. Economics Letters, 125(2), 261-265.
- Klößner, S., & Sekkel, R. (2014). International spillovers of policy uncertainty. Economics Letters, 124(3), 508-512.
- Lam, S. S., Zhang, H., & Zhang, W. (2020). Does Policy Instability Matter for International Equity Markets? International Review of Finance, 20(1), 155-196.
- Li, X., Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., & Chang, T. (2016). The Causal Relationship between Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Returns in China and India: Evidence from a Bootstrap Rolling-Window Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(3),674-689.
- Li, X.-M., & Peng, L. (2017). US economic policy uncertainty and co-movements between Chinese and US stock markets. Economic Modelling, 61, 27-39.
- Liu, L., & Zhang, T. (2015). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Finance Research Letters, 15, 99-105.
- Liu, Z., Ye, Y., Ma, F., & Liu, J. (2017). Can economic policy uncertainty help to forecast the volatility: A multifractal perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 482, 181-188.
- Ma, F., Wahab, M.I.M., Liu, J., & Liu, L. (2018). Is economic policy uncertainty important to forecast the realized volatility of crude oil futures? Applied Economics, 50(18), 2087-2101.
- Mei, D., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y., & Hou, W. (2018). Does US Economic Policy Uncertainty matter for European stock markets volatility? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 512, 215-221.
- Morgan, D. P. (2002). Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry. American Economic Review, 92(4), 874-888.
- Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219-1264.
- Ricci, O. (2015). The impact of monetary policy announcements on the stock price of large European banks during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 245-255.
- Theodorakopoulos, L. (2022). Big data analysis in humanities and economics with machine learning techniques and use of cloud computing technologies (Doctoral Thesis). University of Patras.
- Wang, Y., Zhang, B., Diao, X., & Wu, C. (2015). Commodity price changes and the predictability of economic policy uncertainty. Economics Letters, 127, 39-42.
- Xiao, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investor attention and oil market volatility: Does economic policy uncertainty matter? Energy Economics, 97, 105180.
- Zhang, D., Lei, L., Ji, Q., & Kutan, A. M. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty in the US and China and their impact on the global markets. Economic Modelling, 79, 47-56.
-
Selection of the right proxy market portfolio for CAPM
Rashmi Chaudhary ,
Priti Bakhshi
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.02
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 16-26 Views: 3210 Downloads: 1554 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of the paper is to select the right market proxy for calculating the expected return, since critically evaluating proxies or selecting the correct proxy market portfolio is essential for portfolio management because the change in the market portfolio proxy affects returns. In this study, monthly data of equity indices are evaluated to find out the better market proxy. The indices taken are BSE 30 (Sensex), Nifty 50, BSE 100, BSE 200, and BSE 500. The macroeconomic variables used in the study are industrial production index (IIP), consumer price index (CPI), money supply (M1), and exchange rate in India. To avoid the influence of COVID-19, the research period was from January 2013 to December 2019 to critically evaluate these proxies in order to find the most appropriate market proxy. This paper reveals a noteworthy relationship between stock market returns and macroeconomic factors, while suggesting that the BSE 500 is a better choice for all equity indices, as the index also shows a significant relationship with all macroeconomic variables. BSE500 is a composite index comprising all sectors with low, mid and large cap securities, therefore it reflects the impact of macroeconomic factors most efficiently, taking it as a market proxy. This study was carried out in the context of India and can be replicated for other countries.
-
The performance of the Indian stock market during COVID-19
Rashmi Chaudhary ,
Priti Bakhshi ,
Hemendra Gupta
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.11
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 133-147 Views: 2924 Downloads: 771 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe current empirical study attempts to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the performance of the Indian stock market concerning two composite indices (BSE 500 and BSE Sensex) and eight sectoral indices of Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) (Auto, Bankex, Consumer Durables, Capital Goods, Fast Moving Consumer Goods, Health Care, Information Technology, and Realty) of India, and compare the composite indices of India with three global indexes S&P 500, Nikkei 225, and FTSE 100. The daily data from January 2019 to May 2020 have been considered in this study. GLS regression has been applied to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the multiple measures of volatility, namely standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of all indices. All indices’ key findings show lower mean daily return than specific, negative returns in the crisis period compared to the pre-crisis period. The standard deviation of all the indices has gone up, the skewness has become negative, and the kurtosis values are exceptionally large. The relation between indices has increased during the crisis period. The Indian stock market depicts roughly the same standard deviation as the global markets but has higher negative skewness and higher positive kurtosis of returns, making the market seem more volatile.
-
Evaluating the nationalization & privatization effect: a case of Indian banking industry
Manju Rajan Babu ,
Ashok Kumar M.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.02
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 11-21 Views: 2900 Downloads: 409 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe facilitation of economic transactions and friendly investor environment is undertaken through effective performance of financial systems. Mobilization of savings and funding the profitable business opportunities are essential in improving the efficiency of intermediation. The study aims to evaluate the effects of nationalization and privatization on Indian banks. Various factors have been considered to examine the effects of privatization and nationalization, including sources of public sector inefficiency, measures of firm performance, econometric issues, and the mode of privatization. The data was collected for the period of 1998 to 2016 from Indian banks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the financial reports of the banks selected to evaluate the efficiency of input and output variables. Positive results were observed, concerning the efficiency and profitability of banking industry after banks’ privatization. Performance of private banks has been observed effective and efficient as compared to the public sector banks. Privatization of banks must be increased and maintained to sustain the efficiency of the banks and implement strategies to maintain the assets. Future studies may recruit more appropriate sample size to evaluate the privatization and nationalization effects of Indian banking industry. Greater number of banks will provide more precise results, using data envelopment analysis.
