The impact of financial and competition conglomeration policies on banking efficiency and risk in Indonesia
-
Author(s)Teguh Supangkat ,Eleonora SofildaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-8208
,
Muhammad Zilal HamzahLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6546-4736
,
Ari Mulianta GintingLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2751-1199
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.04
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2020, Issue #3, pp. 29-43
- Cited by
- 1007 Views
-
433 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Financial conglomerates and bank competition play a significant role in developing efficiency levels and increased risk exposure. This study aims to formulate a conceptual model of the policy’s impact of financial conglomerates and bank competition on bank efficiency and stability risk. This research is conducted using data samples from 90 commercial banks in Indonesia from 2010 to 2017. The empirical analysis is carried out using the dynamic data panel or Generalized Method of Moments (GMM). The study results show that policies of financial conglomerates and competition have a positive effect on banking efficiency. These results support previous empirical studies, where financial conglomeration, in general, can improve banking efficiency. Furthermore, it is found that the interaction between financial conglomerates and competition has a positive effect on banking stability. The implication of this research shows that the potential risks that cause distortion become irrelevant when the banking structure is more competitive. Furthermore, this study recommends the need to build the ideal financial conglomerate institutional structure to strengthen and encourage the role of more competitive banks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G34, G32, C23
-
References28
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Research variables
- Table 2. Variable description
- Table 3. The effect of bank conglomeration and competition (COS⋅HHI or CON⋅HHI) on bank efficiency (EFF1)
- Table 4. The effect of bank conglomeration and competition (COS⋅HHI or CON⋅HHI) on bank efficiency (EFF2)
- Table 5. The effect of bank conglomeration and competition (COS⋅HHI or CON⋅HHI) on banking insolvency risk (ZSCORE)
- Table 6. The effect of bank conglomeration and competition (COS⋅HHI or CON⋅HHI) on banking credit risk (LLP)
-
- Altunbas, Y., & Chakravarty, S. P. (1998). Efficiency Measures and the Banking Structure in Europe. Economic Letter, 60(2), 205-208.
- Andrieş, A. M., & Căpraru, B. (2012). Impact of European Integration on Banks Efficiency. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 587-595.
- Andrieş, A. M., & Cocris, V. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Romanian Banks. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 54-75.
- Ariss, R. T. (2010). On the implications of Market Power in Banking: Evidence from Developing Countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(4), 765-775.
- Bank of Japan. (2005). The Expansion of Corporate Groups in the Financial Services Industry: Trends in Financial Conglomeration in Major Industrial Countries.
- Berger, A. N., & Young, R. D. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6), 849-870.
- Casu, B., & Girardone, C. (2002). A comparative study of the cost efficiency of Italian bank conglomerates. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 3-23.
- Chronopoulos, D. K., Girardone, C., & Nankervis, J. C. (2011). Are There Any Cost and Profit Efficiency Gains in Financial Conglomeration? Evidence from the Accession Countries. The European Journal of Finance, 17(8), 603-621.
- Daiwa Institute of Research. (2007). Financial Conglomeration in East Asian Regional Development. Tokyo.
- De Guevara, J. F., & Maudos, J. (2002). Inequalities in the Efficiency of the Banking Sectors of the European Union. Applied Economics Letters, 9(8), 541-544.
- De Nicolo, G., Jalal, A. M., & Boyd, J. H. (2006). Bank Risk-taking and Competition Revisited: New Theory and New Evidence (Working Paper No. 06/297). International Monetary Fund. Washington, DC.
- Evans, P., Hasan, I., & Lozano-Vivas, A. (2008). Deregulation and Convergence of Banking: The EU Experience. Finish Economics Papers, 21(2), 104-117.
- Lozano-Vivas, A., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). The Impact of Non-traditional Activities on the Estimation of Bank Efficiency: International Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1436-1449.
- Macdonald, R. (1998). Consolidated Supervision of Banks. Centre for Central Banking Studies, Bank of England. Handbooks in Central Banking, No. 15. London.
- Mamatzakis, E., Staikouras, C., & Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A. (2008). Bank Efficiency in the New European Union Member States: Is There Convergence? International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(5), 1156-1172.
- Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2014a). Tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Terintegrasi bagi Konglomerasi Keuangan (Peraturan No. 17/POJK.03/2014). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2014b). Tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola Terintegrasi bagi Konglomerasi Keuangan (Peraturan No. 18/POJK.03/2014). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2015). Tentang Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum Terintegrasi bagi Konglomerasi Keuangan. (Peraturan No. 26/POJK.03/2015). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2017). Press Release Financial Conglomerates Required to Set Up Holding Companies: OJK Draft Regulation. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Jakarta.
- Saunders, A., Smith, R.C., & Ingo, W. (2009). Enhanced Regulation of Large Complex Financial Institutions (Chapter 5). In Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System. New York: University Stern School of Business.
- Schaeck, K., & Čihák, M. (2008). How Does Competition Affect Efficiency and Soundness in Banking? New Empirical Evidence (ECB Working Paper No. 932). Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
- Sheldon, G. (2001). Efficiency and Scale Economics in European Banking: A Cross Country Comparison. Mimeo, University of Basle.
- Shirai, S. (2001). Searching for New Regulatory Frameworks for the Immediate Financial Infrastructure in Post-Crisis Asia. Wharton Financial Institutions Center. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
- Skipper, H. (2000). Financial Services Integration Worldwide: Promises and Pitfalls. North American Actuarial Journal, 4(3), 71-108.
- Soedarmono, W., Machrouh, F., & Tarazi, A. (2011). Bank Market Power, Economic Growth, and Financial Stability: Evidence from Asian Banks. Journal of Asian Economics, 22(6), 460-470.
- Vennet, R. V. (2000). Cost and Profit Efficiency of Financial Conglomerates and Universal Banks in Europe. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 34(1), 254-282.
- Verweire, K. (1999). Performance Consequences of Financial Conglomeration with an Empirical Analysis in Belgium and the Netherlands (Ph.D. Thesis). Thela Thesis Publisher, Amsterdam.
- Weill, L. (2004). Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Technique. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 133-152.
-
The impact of monetary policy and bank competition on banking industry risk: A default analysis
Sri Ayomi , Eleonora Sofilda ,
Muhammad Zilal Hamzah ,
Ari Mulianta Ginting
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(1).2021.18
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 16, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 205-215 Views: 1741 Downloads: 881 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the financial system and economy, the banking industry plays a crucial role. Default risk takes central stage in preserving financial stability and needs to be mitigated as it can trigger a crisis. The study examines the combined effects of monetary policy and bank competition on banking defaults. Using a sample of 95 commercial banks in Indonesia between 2009 and 2019, this study employs the Generalized Method of Moments, a two-step dynamic panel-data estimation system, to analyze it. Empirical estimation results show that monetary policy, through an increase in the benchmark interest rate, negatively affects probability of default. The extent of banking stability is also enhanced by monetary policy. Banking competition has a negative and significant effect on probability of default and has a positive effect on the banking distance to default. Furthermore, the combined impact of monetary policy and banking competition positively affects probability of default but has a negative impact on the distance of default. Building on this study, to promote a stable and more efficient banking system, policymakers should develop policies that foster complementary monetary and competition policies.
