Measuring banking efficiency in Vietnam: parametric and non-parametric methods
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.06
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2019, Issue #1, pp. 55-64
- Cited by
- 1816 Views
-
180 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article aims to evaluate the business efficiency of commercial banks in Vietnam using both parametric and non-parametric approaches. In this study, the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), which belongs to a parametric method, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a non-parametric approach, are applied to a sample of 30 joint stock commercial banks in Vietnam in the period of 2011–2015. Applying Tobit regression model, the impact of bank size, bank age, and the ownership feature on the efficiency of bank service industry in Vietnam is also investigated. The analysis results show that in general, the Vietnamese banking efficiency is improving during the selected period regardless of techniques used. However, there is small level of similarity in efficiency rankings identified from the SFA and DEA models. In terms of efficiency determinants, the results show that all three variables of size, age, and state ownership have a positive impact on bank efficiency.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G24, G28
-
References21
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Banks in the research sample
- Table 2. Input and output variables in the model
- Table 3. Results of calculating the business performance of banks in model 1
- Table 4. Results of calculating business performance of banks in model 2
- Table 5. Tobit regression result
- Table 6. Correlation between parametric and non-parametric methods
-
- Altunbas, Y., Liu, M., Molyneux, P., & Seth, R. (2000). Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(10), 1605-1628.
- Banker, R. D., & Maindiratta, A. (1988). Non-parametric Analysis of Technical and Allocative Efficiencies in Production. Econometrica, 56(6), 1315-1332.
- Benston, G. J. (1965). Branch banking and economies of scale. Journal of Finance, 20(2), 312-331.
- Berger, A., & Humphrey, D. (1997). Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Surveyand Directions for Future Research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175-212.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 6(3), 429-444.
- Drake, L., Hall, M. J. B., & Simper, R. (2006). The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: anon-parametric analysis of Hong Kong’s banking system. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 1443-1466.
- Fan, L., & Shaffer, S. (2004). Efficiency versus risk in large domestic US banks. Managerial Finance, 30(9), 1-19.
- Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-281.
- Galan, J. E., Veiga, H., & Wiper, M. P. (2015). Dynamic effects in inefficiency: Evidence from the Columbia banking sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 240, 562-571.
- Lieu, T. T., & Nguyen, T. D. (2012). Business Analysis of Vietnamese joint stock commercial banks. Journal of Science, 21(a), 158-168.
- Lovell, C., & Thore, S. A. (1992). Productive Efficiency under Capitalism and State Socialism: The Chance-Constrained Programming Approach. Publique Finance, 47, 109-121.
- Nguyen, T. H. V. (2012). Measuring technical efficiency and Malmquist index of commercial banks in Vietnam. Journal of Banking Technology, 74, 16-23.
- Ouenniche, J., & Carrales, S. (2018). Analytical models for financial modeling and risk management. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1-2), 551-587.
- Pasiouras, F. (2008). Estimating the technical and scale efficiency of Greek commercial banks: The impact of credit risk, off-balance sheet activities, and international operations. Research in International Business and Finance, 22(3), 301-318.
- Rekik, M., & Kalai, M. (2018). Determinants of banks’ profitability and efficiency: Empirical evidence from a sample of Banking Systems. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, 1(9), 5-23.
- Sealey, C. W. Jr., & Lindley, J. T.(1977). Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1251-1266.
- Silva, C., Miranda, B., Oliveira, T., Marina, C., & Boas, V. (2017). A comparison of DEA and SFA using micro- and macro-level perspectives: Efficiency of Chinese local banks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 469, 216-223.
- Stewart, C., Matousek, R., & Nguyen, T. N. (2015). Efficiency in the Vietnamese banking system: a DEA double bootstrap approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 96-111.
- Sufian, F. (2011). Benchmarking the efficiency of the Korean banking sector: a DEA approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(1), 107-127.
- Sun, L., & Chang, T. P. (2010). A comprehensive analysis of the effects of risk measures on bank efficiency: Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1727-1735.
- Svitalkova, Z. (2014). Comparison and Evaluation of Bank Efficiency in Selected Countries in EU. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 644-653.