The influence of corporate governance on the intellectual capital disclosure: a study on Indonesian private banks
-
Author(s)Joy Elly TulungLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-3721
,
Ivonne Stanley Saerang
,
Stevanus Pandia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(4).2018.06
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2018, Issue #4, pp. 61-72
- Cited by
- 2700 Views
-
403 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The release of bank’s intellectual capital is one of the important elements of bank’s annual reports. Although it is not presented adequately in the annual reports, voluntary disclosure of bank’s intellectual capital relatively represents the response to the needs of greater information for the users. This research aims to see the influence of corporate governance on the intellectual capital disclosure based on a case study on private banks in Indonesia. The variables to be examined in the research include the Composition of Independent Commissioners as well as The Competence of Audit Committee and Risk Oversight Committee. The samples were taken using purposive sampling, considering particular criteria. As many as 62 banks are selected to be taken as research samples. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis method. The result of a partial test shows that the Composition of Independent Commissioners has a positive and significant influence on the intellectual capital disclosure; the Competence of Audit Committee has a positive and significant influence on the intellectual capital disclosure; and the Competence of Risk Oversight committee does not influence the intellectual capital disclosure. Meanwhile, the result of a simultaneous test shows that the Composition of Independent Commissioners, the Competence of Audit Committee, and the Competence of Risk Oversight Committee significantly influence the intellectual capital disclosure.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G34, O34, O53
-
References38
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Operational definition
- Table 2. Results of the descriptive statistic test
- Table 3. Multicollinearity statistics test results, Multiple linear regression test results, T-test statistic result
- Table 4. FANOVAa Statistic test results
-
- Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (2005). Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Market Capitalization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 397-416.
- Beaulieu, P. R., Williams, S. M., & Wright, M. E. (2002). Intellectual Capital Disclosures in Swedish Annual Reports. In N. Bontis (Ed.), World Congress on Intellectual Capital Readings (pp.135-156). Hamilton: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Braendle, U. (2018). The impact of the European Banking Union’s Single Supervisory Mechanism on corporate governance practices in European banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 13(2), 164-177.
- Bukh, P. N., Johansen, M. R., & Mouritsen, J. (2001). Constructing intellectual capital statements. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17(1), 87-108.
- Bukh, P. N., Nielsen, C., Gormsen P., & Mouritsen, J. (2005). Disclosure of Information on Intellectual Capital in Danish IPO Prospectus. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 713-732.
- Caesari, A. P., Abdul, K. I., & Muhammad, S. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Dan Corporate Financial Performance Perusahaan Indeks Kompas100. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan. 19(3), 409-417.
- Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Exploring the Effects of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital Disclosure: An Analysis of European Biotechnology Companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791-826.
- Desender, K. A. (2007). On the Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation (Working paper).
- Devi, S., Budiasih, I. G. N., & Badera, I. D. N. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Enterprise Risk Management dan Pengungkapan Intellectual Capital Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal akuntansi dan keuangan Indonesia, 14(1), 20-45.
- Guthrie, J., & Petty, R. (2000). Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practices. Journal of intellectual capital, 1(3), 241-251.
- Haniffa, R. M. & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430.
- Ho, S. S. M., & Wong, S. K. (2001). A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Structures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139-156.
- Klein, D. A., & Prusak, L. (1994). Characterising Intellectual Capital. Cambridge, MA: Centre for Business Innovation, Ernst and Young.
- Kuncoro. (2009). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis and Ekonomi. UPP-AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
- Leventis, S., & Weetman, P. (2004). Timeliness of financial information disclosed: applicability of disclosure theories in emerging capital market. Accounting and Business Research, 34(1), 43-56.
- Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Corporate Governance Structure in UK Firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 137-159.
- Masita, M., Yuliandhari, W. S., & Muslih, M. (2017). Pengatuh Karakteristik Komite Audit dann Kinerja Intellectual Capital Terhadap Pengungkapan Intellectual Capital. E-jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18(2), 1663-1715.
- Meritum. (2002). Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles. Madrid: Fundacio´n Airtel Mo´vil.
- Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H. T., & Bukh, P. N. (2001). Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualizing and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, organizations and society, 26(7-8), 735-762.
- Nasir, M. N., & Abdullah, S. N. (2004). Accrual Management and the roles of boards of directors and audit committees among Malaysian listed companies: Evidence during the Asian financial crisis. IIUM Journal of Management and economics, 12(1), 48-80.
- Nurfauzi, Y., & Santoso, A. L. (2015). Struktur corporate governance dan pengungkapan intellectual capital. Proceeding Seminar Nasional & Call For Paper (SCA 5), 5(1).
- Purnomosidhi, B. (2005). Analisis empiris terhadap diterminan praktik pengungkapan modal intelektual pada perusahaan publik di BEJ. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 6(2), 118-119.
- Restunigdiah, N. (2011). Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit, Internal Audit & Risk Management Committee Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Jurnal Keuangan and Perbankan, 15(3), 351-362.
- Rodrigues, L. M., Oliveira, L., & Craig, R. (2008). Applying Voluntary Disclosure Theories to Intangibles Reporting: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Market.
- Savitri, E. (2016). Corporate governance mechanism and the moderating effect of independency on the integrity of financial reporting. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(13), 68-74.
- Sing, I., & Zahn, M. (2008). Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure in prospectuses of initial public offerings. Accounting and Business Research, 38(5), 409-431.
- Stewart, T. (2001). La Gestión del Concimiento y el Capital Intelectual. Buenos Aires: Granica.
- Subramaniam, N., McManus, L., & Zhang, J. (2009). Corporate Governance, Firm Characteristics, and Risk Management Committee in Australia Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(4), 316-319.
- Suhardjanto, D., & Wardhani, M. (2010). Praktik intellectual capital disclosure perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 14(1), 71-85.
- Sutikno, F., Wahidahwati, and Asyik, N F (2014). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Manajemen Laba di Industri Perbankan Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi Vol. 3 No. 10.
- Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth. USA: Berett-Koehler Publishers.
- Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2016). The Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on BPD Performance. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 8(3), 155-166.
- Tunggal, A. W. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Pengendalian Internal dan Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Harvarindo.
- Utomo, A., & Chariri, A. (Eds.) (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual dan Dampaknya Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Proceedings from Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVII, Medan.
- Uwuigbe, U., Felix, E. D., Uwuigbe, O. R., Teddy, O., & Irene, F. (2018). Corporate governance and quality of financial statements: a study of listed Nigerian banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 13(3), 12-23.
- Uzliawati, L. (2015). Dewan Komisaris dan Intellectual Capital Disclosure Pada Perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 19(2), 226-234.
- Widiarjo, W. (2011). Pengaruh Modal Intelektual Dan Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual Pada Nilai Perusahaan Yang Melakukan Initial Public Offering. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Volume, 8(2), 157-170.
- Williams, M. S. (2001). Is intellectual capital performance and disclosure practices related? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 192-203.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4473 Downloads: 1719 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuniarti Fihartini ,
Arief Helmi ,
Meydia Hassan ,
Yevis Marty Oesman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 17-29 Views: 4453 Downloads: 1707 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana ,
Gede Suparna ,
I Gusti Made Suwandana ,
Sebastian Kot ,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 3495 Downloads: 825 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
