Digital banking impact on Turkish deposit banks performance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.05
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2018, Issue #3, pp. 48-57
- Cited by
- 1823 Views
-
1005 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The technological developments in the banking sector have significant implications for banks and are dramatically changing the way retail banks conduct their business. Banks can invest in digital banking (DB) services either to acquire a strategic advantage or because doing so has become a strategic necessity. This study is organized to examine if DB service channels have any positive or negative impact on Turkish deposit banks’ performance. With this aim in mind, in the first stage of the proposed DEA model, physical assets are used. Then, in the second stage, DB service channels are added to see if they have any impact on banks’ performance. The results show that the banks are investing in DB services just to keep the competition as it is. In other words, they invest in DB services as a strategic necessity. DB services do not provide any strategic advantage to any banks in terms of financial performance or efficiency since the banks are already efficient. Investing in DB only helped to preserve their strategic positions. The Turkish deposit banking industry is very competitive and very profitable, and it is necessary to invest in DB services just to keep the competition as it is.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, L21, L25, O33
-
References41
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. First stage DEA model
- Figure 2. Second stage DEA model
-
- Table 1. The banks’ main variables
- Table 2. Statistics on input and output data
- Table 3. Turkish deposit banks main variables
- Table 4. Efficiency scores of DMUs in both stages
-
- Acharya, R. N., Kagan, A., & Lingam, S. R. (2008). Online banking applications and community bank performance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(6), 418-439.
- Akhigbe, A., & McNulty, J. E. (2003). The profit efficiency of small US commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 307-325.
- Atan, M. (2003). Türkiye bankacılık sektöründe veri zarflama analizi ile bilançoya dayalı mali etkinlik ve verimlilik analizi. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 14(48), 71-86.
- Atan, M., & Çatalbaş, G. K. (2005). Bankacılıkta etkinlik ve sermaye yapısının bankaların etkinliğine etkisi. İktisat-İşletme Finans, 233, 49-62.
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, R. F., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
- Chau, P. Y., & Lai, V. S. K. (2003). An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 123-145.
- Çolak, Ö. F., & Altan, Ş. (2002). Toplam etkinlik ölçümü: Türkiye’deki özel ve kamu bankaları için bir uygulama. İktisat-İşletme Finans, 196, 45-55.
- Cortiñas, M., Chocarro, R., & Villanueva, M. L. (2010). Understanding multi-channel banking customers. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1215-1221.
- Çukur, S. (2005). Türk ticari bankacılık sisteminde etkinlik analizi. İktisat-İşletme Finans, 233, 17-27.
- DeYoung, R. (2005). The performance of Internet based business models: evidence from the banking industry. The Journal of Business, 78(3), 893-948.
- DeYoung, R., Lang, W. W., & Nolle, D. L. (2007). How the Internet affects output and performance at community banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1033-1060.
- Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-290.
- Goh, K. H., & Kauffman, R. J. (2013). Firm strategy and the Internet in U.S. commercial banking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(2), 9-40.
- İskenderoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, E., & Atioğlu, E. (2012). Türk bankacılık sektöründe büyüme, büyüklük ve sermaye yapısı kararlarının karlılığa etkisinin analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 7(1), 291-311.
- Japparova, I., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2017). Banking business models of the digital future: the case of Latvia. European Research Studies Journal, XX(3A), 846-860.
- Kahveci, E., & Taliyev, R. (2016). The disclosure behavior and performance of Russian firms: public disclosure index and DEA application. Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(3), 257-266.
- Kahveci, E. (2011). Firm performance and resource-based theory: An application with DEA. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 2(4), 38-50.
- Kahveci, E. (2012). Kaynak Temelli Strateji ve ihracat performansı: Tekstil işletmeleri üzerinde veri zarflama analizi ile bir uygulama. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 67(2), 29-67.
- Kahveci, E. (2016). The tone of annual reports as a strategic performance management tool: application on Turkey’s Borsa Istanbul corporate governance index firms. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 3(3), 209-221.
- Kahveci, E., Celen, Y., & Ekşi, İ. H. (2013). Assessment of the performance of Turkish deposit banks by DEA window analysis. Bankacılar Dergisi, 24(86), 53-66.
- Kahveci, E., Ekşi, İ. H., & Kaya, Z. (2016). Relation between capital structure and Profitability of Turkish commercial banking Sector: 2002–2014 period panel data analysis. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 446-461.
- Kisielewska, M., Guzowska M., Nellis, J. G., & Zarzecki, D. (2005). Polish banking industry efficiency: DEA window analysis approach. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 3(1), 15-31.
- Liu, J. (2016). Decision modeling and empirical analysis of mobile financial services. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertations and Theses, Singapore Management University.
- Mbama, C. I., & Ezepue, P. O. (2018). Digital banking, customer experience and bank financial performance: UK customers’ perceptions. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(2), 230-255.
- Nath, P., Nachiappan, S., & Ramanathan, R. (2010). The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: A resource-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2), 317-329.
- Paradi, J. C., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank – a DEA application. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 719-735.
- Paradi, J. C., Rouatt, S., & Zhu, H. (2011). Two-Stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 39, 99-109.
- Polatoğlu, V., & Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers acceptance of internet banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(4), 156-165.
- Samad, Q. A., & Patwary, F. K. (2003). Technical efficiency in the textile industry of Bangladesh: An application of frontier production function. Information and Management Sciences, 14(1), 19-30.
- Sayar, C., & Wolfe, S. (2007). Internet banking market performance: Turkey versus the UK. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(3), 122-141.
- Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2009). Case Study: Improving branch profitability and service with data envelopment analysis. Bank Accounting & Finance, 22(3), 15-24.
- Soteriou, A., & Zenibs, S. (1999). Operations, quality and profitability in the provision of banking services. Management Science, 45, 1221-1238.
- TBA (2018).
- Thanassoulis, E. (1999). Data envelopment analysis and its use in banking. Interfaces, 29(3), 1-13.
- Toraman, C., Ata, H. A., & Buğan, M. F. (2015). Mevduat ve katılım bankalarının karşılaştırmalı performans analizi. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 301-310.
- Tunay, K. B., & Silpar, A. M. (2006). Türk Ticari Bankacılık Sektöründe Karlılığa Dayalı Performans Analizi-I. Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Araştırma Tebliğleri Serisi, 01.
- Ulucan, A. (2000). Şirket performanslarının ölçülmesinde veri zarflama analizi yaklaşımı: genel ve sektörel bazda değerlendirmeler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 419-437.
- Ulucan, A. (2002). ISO500 şirketlerinin etkinliklerinin ölçülmesinde veri zarflama analizi yaklaşımı:farklı girdi çıktı bileşenleri ve ölçeğe göre getiri yaklaşımları ile değerlendirmeler. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57(2), 182-202.
- Yavas, B., & Fisher, D. (2005). Performance evaluation of commercial bank branches using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 89-102.
- Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105-124.