Who prefers regular dividends? The effect of inventory level and firm operating efficiency on dividends in an emerging market
-
Received July 4, 2023;Accepted August 23, 2023;Published August 31, 2023
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2582-3516Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-2214
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.15
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #3, pp. 177-187
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 328 Views
-
89 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Stable regular dividends can deliver the steady operation of a firm’s performance to its investors. When firms experience lower operation efficiency and more negative performance, they can affect their cash burden and lower the regular dividends. According to the cash conversion cycle theory, quicker inventory turnover could benefit the firm, and it is a significant signal of efficiency and high performance. In the real business environment, the expectation of future production, logistics and inflation can all affect managers’ decisions. This paper uses data from all Chinese manufacturing companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2017 to 2020 as a sample. The paper provides the empirical causality between inventory turnover, operating efficiency indicators, and dividend distribution, by applying the regression method to find the causality relationship between inventory as the efficiency indicator and the distribution of dividends. The findings indicate that inventory consideration can be complicated and experience the inverse U-shape relationship with dividend decisions. Further, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have different considerations about operating efficiency. They prefer to pay stable regular dividends, even if they are under pressure on operating efficiency and suffer from large inventories. SOEs believe that following political guidance and meeting their social obligations is their prioritized mission.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G31, G35, G40
-
References49
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable definitions
- Table 2. General statistics
- Table 3. Dividends and inventory circulate efficiency
- Table 4. ROA and inventory circulate efficiency
- Table 5. Non-linear dividends and inventory circulate efficiency
- Table 6. State-owned-enterprise and inventory circulate efficiency on dividend
- Table 7. Heterogeneity in different exchanges
- Table 8. Summary of findings
-
- Ameer, R. (2010). The role of institutional investors in the inventory and cash management practices of firms in Asia. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 20(2-3), 126-143.
- Archambault, M., & Archambault, J. (1999). A test of the firm characteristics hypothesis for LIFO choice of Canadian firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8(1), 165-188.
- Ball, R., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2022). On earnings and cash flows as predictors of future cash flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 73(1), 101430.
- Balli, F., Agyemang, A., Gregory-Allen, R., & Balli, H. O. (2022). Corporate dividend smoothing: The role of cross-listing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102151.
- Baron, O., Callen, J. L., & Segal, D. (2023). Does the bullwhip matter economically? A cross-sectional firm-level analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108814.
- Barros, V., Matos, P. V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). What firm’s characteristics drive the dividend policy? A mixed-method study on the Euronext stock exchange. Journal of Business Research, 115, 365-377.
- Beladi, H., Hou, Q., & Hu, M. (2022). The party school education and corporate innovation: Evidence from SOEs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102143.
- Bendig, D., Brettel, M., & Downar, B. (2018). Inventory component volatility and its relation to returns. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 37-49.
- Brunzell, T., Hansson, M., & Liljeblom, E. (2011). The use of derivatives in Nordic firms. The European Journal of Finance, 17(5-6), 355-376.
- Chandramohan, J., Chakravarthi, R. P. A., & Ramasamy, U. (2023). A Comprehensive Inventory Management System for Non-Instantaneous Deteriorating Items in Supplier-Retailer-Customer Supply Chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 100015.
- Chen, C. C. H., Guo, R. J., & Lin, L. Y. H. (2023). The effect of political influence on corporate valuation: Evidence from party-building reform in China. International Review of Law and Economics, 73, 106120.
- Chen, C. H., Choy, S. K., & Tan, Y. (2022). The cash conversion cycle spread: International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 140, 106517.
- Chen, M., Xie, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Heterogeneity of dividend smoothing: A strategic response to peer competition in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 76, 101874.
- Daniel, N. D., Denis, D. J., & Naveen, L. (2008). Do firms manage earnings to meet dividend thresholds? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 2-26.
- Dbouk, W., Moussawi-Haidar, L., & Jaber, M. Y. (2020). The effect of economic uncertainty on inventory and working capital for manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 230, 107888.
- Dvořáková, L., Kronych, J., & Malá, A. (2018). Cash flow management as a tool for corporate processes optimization. Smart Science, 6(4), 330-336.
- Eldomiaty, T. I., Bahaa El Din, M., & Atia, O. (2018). Modeling growth rates and anomalies of financing, investment and dividend decisions. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 38(3), 159-167.
- Espahbodi, R., Liu, N., & Weigand, R. A. (2022). Opportunistic earnings management or performance-related effects? Evidence from dividend-paying firms. Global Finance Journal, 54, 100636.
- Fauver, L., & Naranjo, A. (2010). Derivative usage and firm value: The influence of agency costs and monitoring problems. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 719-735.
- Flynn, A., & Li, Q. (2023). Determinants of supplier payment times before and during the pandemic: Empirical evidence from UK firms. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 100850.
- He, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2022). Production/inventory competition between firms with fixed-proportions co-production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(2), 497-509.
- He, W., & Kyaw, N. A. (2018). Ownership structure and investment decisions of Chinese SOEs. Research in International Business and Finance, 43, 48-57.
- Huang, K., Fang, S., Xu, C., & Qian, X. (2019). Effect of political connections on corporate financial constraints: new evidence from privatization in China. Applied Economics Letters, 26(8), 638-644.
- Jabbouri, I. (2016). Determinants of corporate dividend policy in emerging markets: Evidence from MENA stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 283-298.
- Ji, P., & Wei, L. (2023). Hedging with derivatives to increase firm value. Finance Research Letters, 103981.
- Jin, X., Xu, L., Xin, Y., & Adhikari, A. (2022). Political governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(2), 100236.
- Kilincarslan, E. (2021). Smoothed or not smoothed: The impact of the 2008 global financial crisis on dividend stability in the UK. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101423.
- Kim, K. (2020). Inventory, fixed capital, and the cross-section of corporate investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101528.
- Kong, G., Zhang, H., Wang, D., Yang, Z., & Liu, H. (2021). Political promotion and pay gap: Evidence from SOEs in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 450-460.
- Li, S., Zhang, J., & Tang, W. (2015). Joint dynamic pricing and inventory control policy for a stochastic inventory system with perishable products. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 2937-2950.
- Lin, Q., & Lin, X. (2021). Cash conversion cycle and aggregate stock returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 52, 100560.
- Liu, L., & Shu, H. (2022). Mandatory dividend policy and perk consumption: Evidence from state-owned business groups in China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 77, 101536.
- Meng, H., & Siu, T. K. (2011). On optimal reinsurance, dividend and reinvestment strategies. Economic Modelling, 28(1-2), 211-218.
- Michaely, R., & Moin, A. (2022). Disappearing and reappearing dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(1), 207-226.
- Moser, P., Isaksson, O. H., & Seifert, R. W. (2017). Inventory dynamics in process industries: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 253-266.
- Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2010). Are firms hedging or speculating? The relationship between financial derivatives and firm risk. Applied Financial Economics, 20(10), 827-843.
- Ouyang, P., & Zhong, L. (2023). Asset Redeployability and Dividend Payout Policy. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance.
- Plenborg, T. (1998). The operating cycle and the information content of earnings and cash flow. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 273-287.
- Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2014). Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 340-350.
- Sarte, P. D., Schwartzman, F., & Lubik, T. A. (2015). What inventory behavior tells us about how business cycles have changed. Journal of Monetary Economics, 76, 264-283.
- Sarwar, B., Ming, X., & Husnain, M. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and dividend sustainability: new insight from emerging equity market of China. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 204-223.
- Serrano, A., Oliva, R., & Kraiselburd, S. (2017). On the cost of capital in inventory models with deterministic demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 14-20.
- Shen, J. H., Zhang, J., Lee, C. C., & Li, W. (2020). Toward a theory of internal governance structure of China’s large SOEs. Journal of Asian Economics, 70, 101236.
- Tan, J., Yan, L., & Chan, K. C. (2020). The impact of the logistics service standardization on firm value: Evidence from China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 52, 101134.
- Tang, L. (2023). SOEs reform and capital efficiency in China: A structural analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 85, 1-20.
- Wang, B. (2019). The cash conversion cycle spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 472-497.
- Wang, Y., Ji, Y., Chen, X., & Song, C. (2014). Inflation, operating cycle, and cash holdings. China Journal of Accounting Research, 7(4), 263-276.
- Xin, Q., Bao, A., & Hu, F. (2019). West meets east: Understanding managerial incentives in Chinese SOEs. China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(2), 177-189.
- Yu, D., Huang, D., Chen, L., & Li, L. (2023). Forecasting dividend growth: The role of adjusted earnings yield. Economic Modelling, 120, 106188.
-
-
Conceptualization
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Data curation
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Formal Analysis
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Investigation
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Methodology
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Software
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Validation
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Writing – original draft
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Writing – review & editing
Haibin Piao, Dachen Sheng
-
Supervision
Dachen Sheng
-
Conceptualization
-
The effect of working capital management on profitability: a case of listed manufacturing firms in South Africa
Jason Kasozi doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2-2).2017.05Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017 Issue #2 (cont. 2) pp. 336-346 Views: 3255 Downloads: 2669 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWorking capital management plays a pivotal role in enhancing the operational efficiency of firms and their ultimate profitability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the trends in working capital management and its impact on the financial performance of listed manufacturing firms on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE). A panel data methodology was used with different regression estimators to analyze this relationship based on an unbalanced panel of 69 manufacturing firms listed during the period 2007–2016.
The findings revealed that the average collection period and the average payment period are negative and statistically significant for profitability, implying that firms which efficiently manage their accounts receivable and those that pay their creditors on time perform better than those that do not. Additionally, a positive statistically significant relationship between the number of days in inventory and profitability was supported suggesting that firms which stock-up and maintain their inventory levels suffer less from stock-outs and avoid challenges of securing financing when needed. This increases their operational efficiency and ensures profitability in the long run. It could not be ascertained whether a shorter or longer cash conversion cycle enhances firm profitability, since findings to support this premise were weak. However, it was observed that manufacturing firms are on average, carrying lot of debt in their capital structures.
The present study contributes to existing literature by presenting one of the very recent findings on this topic while simultaneously testing the validity of recent local and international methodologies, in order to inform policy change. -
Determinants of dividend policy
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 167-177 Views: 2974 Downloads: 644 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPakistan’s capital market and economy have significant features for examining the dynamics of the dividend policy. The agency conflicts between the management and the investors of the firms are main barriers to the success of the firm. The shareholder is generally taking away all the rights and similarly has a control on the decision concerning the dividend policy. The dividends are conveying better information than any other source regarding the firm’s prospects. The aim of this research is to identify and analyze the influence of shareholder preference and dividend signaling on the dividend policy of the corporations in Pakistan. The respective study presents the analysis of top financial management beliefs by taking eighty listed corporations on Pakistani stock exchanges during 2017–2018. Pearson correlation and multiple regressions are applied on responses to explore whether there is an influence regarding the shareholder preferences and the signaling mechanism on the dividend policy of the listed firms in Pakistan. Through statistical techniques the findings proved that shareholder preferences and dividend signaling have a positive and significant relationship with the dividend policy of listed corporations. Dividend policy is the response of investor preferences and signaling aspect of dividends.
-
Does stock ownership impact liquidity and dividends?
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 111-121 Views: 1615 Downloads: 244 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study investigates the interactions among stock ownership, liquidity and dividends in the UK stock market over the period 2002–2016. Using different liquidity measures, it is shown that stocks with higher levels of free float (institutional ownership) are associated with higher (lower) levels of liquidity. In addition, a positive and significant relation is found between institutional ownership and dividend payout policy, which, as a result, highlights the comparative tax advantages that UK institutions have for dividend income. These relations hold even after controlling for firm-specific characteristics. Finally, a negative relation is found between dividends and liquidity, implying that investors with less (more) liquid stocks are more (less) likely to receive dividend payments.