When knowledge matters: job change made easier? unpacking the black box

  • 1385 Views
  • 231 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Knowing where to find inside information can mean the difference between getting a job from a suitable company or following the wrong direction and wasting precious time, happiness or health in the wrong job and job environment. This article investigates the influence of electronic online word of mouth in the form of job reviews during the process of changing jobs and finding the right job. Job review sites are becoming more and more popular in the process of job search. While the professional world has already started to acknowledge job review sites as useful tools in the process of job search, so far, the academic scene has not paid much attention to this dynamic. The intention of this article is to change this. Based on a literature review, this article shows that job review sites already play a central and valuable role in job change processes by giving inside information through employees who already have experience with employers.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. The 5 phases of resistance to change
    • Table 1. Social Structure of Job Review Companies
    • Table 2. Content of Job Review Sites
    • AC Nielsen (2012). Nielsen: global consumers trust in earned advertising grows in importance.
    • Adkins, A., & Rigoni, B. (2016). Millennial Job-Hoppers: What They Seek.
    • Anderson, Myles (2014). 88% of Consumers Trust Online Reviews As Much As Personal Recommendations. Bright Local, July 7th.
    • Associated Press (2013). Employees rate their employers, CEOs on Glassdoor. CBC News.
    • Astheimer, Sven (2013). Laestern ueber den Chef lohnt sich. FAZ, October 10.
    • Auger, P., Devinney, T., Dowling, G., Eckert, C., & Lin, N. (2013) How much does a Company’s reputation matter in recruiting? MITSloan Management Review, Spring, March 19.
    • Binner, Miriam (2015). Arbeiten Sie hier bloss nicht! Handelsblatt, February 17.
    • Bitkom (2015).
    • Bolles, Richard N. (2016). What Colour Is Your Parachute? New York, Ten Speed Press.
    • Bravo, R., Montaner, T., Pina, J. M. (2009). The role of bank image for customers versus non customers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(4), 315-334.
    • Cable, D. M., & Graham, M. (2000). The determinants of organizational reputation: a job search perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 929-947.
    • Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: a brand-equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2244-2266.
    • Castellano, S., Khelladi, I., Chipaux, A., & Kupferminc, C. (2014). The Influence of Social Networks on E-Reputation: How Sportspersons Manage the Relationship with Their Online Community. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 10(4), 65-79, October-December.
    • Chan, N. L., & Guillet, B. D. (2011). Investigation of social media marketing: How does the hotel industry in Hong Kong perform in Marketing on social media websites? Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(4), 345-368.
    • Chang, Y. P. (2012). The Influence Mechanism of Third-Party Product Reviews (TPRs) on Impulse Buying Intention Within the Internet Environment: by Product Category and Commentators Rank for Regulation Variables. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(9), 1244-1264.
    • Cheng, X., & Zhou, M. (2010). Empirical study on credibility of electronic word of mouth. Management and Services Science Proceedings of the International Conference in Wuhan China (pp. 1-4). Scientific Reseach Publishing.
    • Chevlier, J. A., & Maysline, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 345-354.
    • Chun, R., & Davies, G. (2001). E-Reputation: The role of mission and vision statements in positioning strategy. The Journal of Brand Management, 8(4), 315-333.
    • Clifton, Jim (2016). How Millennials Want to Work and Life.
    • Conner, D. (2006). Managing at the speed of change. New York, Random House.
    • Dowling, G. (1988). Measuring corporate images: a review of alternative approaches. Journal of Business Research, 17, 27-34.
    • Drautz, Mischa (2013). Arbeitgeber-Bewertung. Was bringt das? Die Zeit, 18.
    • Drucker, Peter F. (2001). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Harper Paperbacks.
    • Edwards, J. R. (2008). Person-environment fit in organizations: an assessment of theoretical progress. The Aacademy of Management Annuals, 2, 167-230.
    • Edwards, M. R. (2010). An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory. Personnel Review, 39(1), 5-23.
    • Erik Schonfeld (2008). At Glassdoor, Find Out How Much People Really Make At Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, And Everywhere Else. TechCrunch, June 10.
    • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2013). Trusting expert-versus user-generated ratings online: the role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1626-1634.
    • Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation. Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    • Friedman (2006). Learning to lead in all domains of life. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(9), 1270-1297.
    • Gabriel, Y. (1995). Storytelling in organizations: facts, fictions and fantasies. Organization Studies, 16, 477-501.
    • Glassdoor (2008). Glassdoor.com opens doors to workplace around the world.
    • Glassdoor (2014). What candidates desire most isn’t readily available on traditional company careers sites.
    • Glassdoor (2015A). Alexa Internet. Retrieved December 14, 2015.
    • Glassdoor (2015B). CEO Robert Hohman Talks About the Glassdoor Mission.
    • Glassdoor, Q1 (2016).
    • Glassdoor (2016). About us.
    • Global Trust in Advertising Winning Strategies for an evolving media landscape September 2015. The Nielsen Global Trust in Advertising Survey polled 30,000 online respondents in 60 countries to gauge consumer sentiment about 19 paid, earned and owned advertising mediums.
    • Granovetter, Mark S. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
    • Granovetter, Mark S. (1995). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
    • Grant, Rob (2013). Facebook voted world’s best employer. Daily Telegraph, April 8.
    • Hamori, M., Koyuncu, B., Cao, J., & Graf, T. (2015). What High-Potential Young Managers Want. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall 2015.
    • Hatch, M. J., Schultz, M., & Williamson, J. (2003). Bringing the corporation into corporate branding. European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1041-64.
    • Hein, Rich (2013). Top 8 Sites for Researching Your Next Employer. CIO, March 28.
    • Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., & Harlow, R. E. et al. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
    • Hil, & Knowlton (2011). Reputation and the war for talent. Corporate Reputation Watch (2008). Accessed December 2011.
    • Hobart, J., & Sendek, H. (2014). Millennials and the Evolution of Leadership (2nd ed.).
    • Jobadvisor (2016a).
    • Jobadvisor (2016b).
    • Kazoleas, D., Yungwook, K., & Moffitt, M. A. (2001) Institutional image: a case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(4), 205-21.
    • Kim, S. (2012). Does person-organization fit matter in the public sector? Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830-840.
    • King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: a review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167-183.
    • Kochan, T. (2015). The Leader’s Choice. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall 2015.
    • Kolbert, E. (2012). Spoiled rotten: Why do kids rule the roost? New Yorker, 76-79.
    • Kotter, J., & Rathgeber, H. (2016). That’s Not How We Do It Here! A Story about How Organizations Rise and Fall – and Can Rise. Penguin Random House.
    • Kotter, John P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
    • Kotter, John P. (2002). The Heart of Change. New York.
    • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death and Dying. Routledge.
    • Lange, Antonia (2013). Erst die Masse macht’s. Spiegel Online, August 1.
    • Lasalle, Luann, (2013). Website lets workers rate their bosses anonymously. Calgary Herald, April 10.
    • Little, Joey (2015). Who Do You Trust? 92% of Consumers Trust Peer Recommendations Over Advertising. Linkedin, Mar 24.
    • Lundy, O., & Cowling, A. (1996). Strategic Human Resource Management. Routledge, London.
    • Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., Ng, E. S. W., Kuron, L. K. J. (2012). Comparing apples to apples: A qualitative investigation of career mobility patterns across four generations. Career Development International, 17(4), 333-357.
    • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
    • McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York, McGraw Hill.
    • Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychologyical capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446.
    • Perez Sarah (2012). Glassdoor Raises $20M Series D To Expand Internationally. TechCrunch, October 31.
    • RateMyEmyemployer (2016).
    • Rong, J., Vu, H. Q., Law, R., & Li, G. (2013). A behavioral analysis of web sharers and browsers in Hong Kong using targeted association rule mining. Tourism Management, 33(4), 731-740.
    • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
    • Serra Cantallops, A., & Salvi, F. (2014). New consumer behavior: a review of research on eWOM and hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 41-51.
    • Smolkin, Sheryl (2013). Job hunting? Check out these online employer ratings, 10 June.
    • Sparks, B., Kam Fung So, K., Bradley, & Graham, L. (2016). Responding to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and concern. Tourism Management, 53, 74-85.
    • The JobCrowd (2015). Who we are.
    • TM Staff (2014). 15 Facts About Online Reviews and What They Mean for Business Owners. March 17. Reputation Management to Success and Failure. In Sims, H. P. Jr.l & Gioia, D. A: The Thinking Organization.
    • Tulgan, B. (2009). Not Everyone Gets A Trophy. How To Manage Generation Y. Jossey-Bass.
    • Turban, D. B., Forret, M. L., & Hendrickson, C. L. (1998). Applicant attraction to firms: influences of organization reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 24-44.
    • Ventura, Maybelline (2013). Which is the best employer review site? Undercover recruiter, June 5, 2013.
    • Weiss, Greg (2013). Is your employer brand at real risk? Professional Updates Management, July.
    • Wingfield, Nick (2010). Employers Sound Off on Company Review Site. Wall Street Journal, June 23.
    • Wong, Vanessa (2013). Why Employees Like Zuckerberg (and Other Popular CEOs). Business Week, March 18.
    • Xie, C., Bagozzi R., & Meland, K. (2015). The impact of reputation and identity congruence on employer brand attractiveness. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33, 2.
Related Articles

  • The impact of organizational culture on job performance: a study of Saudi Arabian public sector work culture

    Ghazi Ben SaadORCID Researcher ID, Muzaffar AbbasORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.17
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 207-218 Views: 3013 Downloads: 1188 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This research aims to assess direct and indirect influences of organizational culture on job performance, as well as to evaluate the impact of each sub-element of organizational culture on such performance. It is argued that employees performance derives, on the one hand, from a long-term perspective related to changes that organizations manage and implement during their process of growth. A second dimension of organizational culture can be given through organizational values, routines and distinctive aspects of culture that allow organizations to create solid competitive advantages. Since most studies in this field were held in Western work cultures, this paper will be devoted to the analysis of this relationship within an Arabic cultural environment and more specifically within a Saudi context. A quantitative study tool, based on a comprehensive research questionnaire, was used and the sample was selected from various government departments being operative in Alkharj. The findings indicate a positive relationship between organizational culture and job performance. Likewise, four organizational culture sub-elements, namely Managing Change, Achieving Goals, Coordinating Teamwork and Cultural Strength, were found affecting positively on job performance, but with varying and distinct intensity. Only Customer Orientation was found negatively associated with job performance.

  • Impact of transformational leadership on employees’ reactions to change and mediating role of organizational trust: Evidence from service companies in Hungary

    Khadija Aya HamzaORCID Researcher ID, Ayman AlshaabaniORCID Researcher ID, Najd SalamehORCID , Ildiko RudnakORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.43
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022         Issue #2         pp. 522-535 Views: 1458 Downloads: 334 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In the context of organizational change, employees can have different reactions, where some of them accept and engage with it, and others completely refuse and resist it. Hence, companies should permanently settle for the best and introduce a fruitful leadership style along with a good change management strategy to ensure the company’s prolonged survival and prosperity.
    This investigation aims to examine the influence of transformational leadership on employees’ affective commitment and intention to support change. Both were chosen to constitute the main dimensions of employees’ reactions toward organizational change and highlight the importance of organizational trust as a mediator in that correlation.
    To confirm the hypotheses subtracted from the literature review, a quantitative study was managed by a survey devoted to 428 employees working for diverse service companies in Hungary and going through different change cases.
    Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then applied to hold out the favorable findings, which reveal that transformational leadership is a booster for employees’ intention to support change but not for affective commitment. It was also found that organizational trust firmly mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ reaction to change.
    This statement justifies that both transformational leadership and organizational trust are able to reduce change complexity and lead to its acceptance, openness, and support.

  • Systematization of drivers of change in the higher education system of the Russian Federation

    Мaria О. SuraevaORCID , Irina А. PlaksinaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.06
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #2         pp. 56-63 Views: 1411 Downloads: 146 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In modern conditions, the higher education system of the Russian Federation is characterized by high degree of changeability. It is caused by need of quick and adequate response to changes of internal and external environment. The specified changes are determined by the nature of requirements and interests of stakeholders, which interact with higher education institutions: satisfaction of needs of stakeholders becomes an ultimate goal of development and the most important condition of existence of any organization, including the sector of higher education. Therefore, stakeholders become the main driving forces (drivers) of change in activity of higher education institutions. The research goal is to systematize drivers of change in the higher education system of the Russian Federation. The main research methods are analysis (for detection of the set of drivers of change), classification (for allocation of types of drivers), and the construction method of managerial models (for creation of matrices of changes). Following the research results, current changes in activity of Russian higher education institutions are divided into 4 types: changes in educational, research, innovation and entrepreneurial management activity. The main groups of stakeholders (drivers of change) are distinguished, and their influence on change in activity of higher education institutions is justified. Drivers of change are classified by 2 features: “by attitude to a higher education institution” – into external and internal, “by nature” – into obligatory and initiative. The matrices of necessary and initiative changes are designed. They create interrelation between types of changes and their influence on interests of key stakeholders of Russian higher education institutions (effects, which can be favorable, unfavorable and neutral). The possibility of using the matrices of changes as a tool of managerial decision-making in activity of Russian universities is justified.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management